PHYSIOGNOMY AND VEGETATION STRUCTURE IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS OF “CAATINGA” IN “SERRA TALHADA” PERNAMBUCO STATE, BRAZIL

Authors

  • Séfora Gil Gomes de Farias
  • Maria Jesus Nogueira Rodal
  • André Laurênio de Melo
  • Maria Amanda Menezes Silva
  • André Luiz Alves de Lima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509822745

Keywords:

semiarid, seasonality, environmental factors, spatial heterogeneity.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of spatial heterogeneity of abiotic factors on the spatial patterns of vegetation structure of the woody component and of its regeneration; it was carried out in an area of “caatinga” located in the Parque Estadual Mata of Pimenteira, municipality of “Serra Talhada”, interior of Pernambuco State, Brazil. The sample was divided into two environments, one near the watercourse with denser vegetation (I) and another at 100 meters away from the watercourse with more open vegetation (II). In each environment, four permanent plots of 20×50 m were installed and divided into ten plots of 10×10 m; alive individuals with stem ground level diameter (GD) of ≥3 cm and total height of ≥1 m were measured. In one corner of each plot, a sub-plot of 2×2 m was allocated to measure the individuals’ height and diameter of the sampled species in woody component with GD from 0.5 to 2.9 cm (regeneration). Community's general phytosociological descriptors of the different environments were calculated and the individuals’ distribution in histograms was evaluated for the woody component as for regeneration. After testing for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, values of phytosociological descriptors per plot were compared between the environments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of a criterion was used for data with normal distribution. Data without normal distribution were analyzed by non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Environments showed significant differences in the number of individuals (4047.5 versus 3332.5 ind.ha-1) and basal area (23.6 versus 17.6 m2. ha-1) with significantly higher values in environment I; this pattern was opposite to the regenerating pattern in which the number of individuals and basal area were higher in the environment II (9187.5 vs. 10937.5 ind.ha-1 and 1.9 vs. 2.5 m2.ha-1, respectively). In total, fifty species, including woody and regenerating component, were sampled; significant differences in diversity were found between environments in the different strata, although the similarity was more than 80%. Most chemical and textural soil variables did not differ statistically, except for levels of Al3+, which showed higher levels in the environment I. Among other edaphic variables, only the stony variables differed between environments I and II (3.87 versus 1.47%). The vegetation physiognomic distinction between the environments is result from populations’ presence of individuals with greater heights and diameters in the environment I. The spatial heterogeneity of environmental variables found in the studied environments explained part of changes in floristic and structural characteristics of the vegetation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALCOFORADO-FILHO, F. G.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B.; RODAL, M. J. N. Florística e fitossociologia de um remanescente de vegetação caducifólia espinhosa arbórea em Caruaru, Pernambuco. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 17, p. 287-303, 2003.

AMORIM I. L.; SAMPAIO E. V. S. B.; ARAUJO E. L. Flora e estrutura da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea de uma área de caatinga do Seridó, RN, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 19, p. 615-623, 2005.

ANDRADE, W. M. de. et al. Influência da precipitação na abundância de populações de plantas da caatinga. Revista de Geografia. Recife-UFPE, v. 26, p. 161-184, 2009.

ANDRADE-LIMA, D. The caatingas dominium. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, v. 4, p. 149-153, 1981.

BALVANERA, P.; AGUIRRE, E. Tree diversity, environmental heterogeneity, and productivity in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Biotropica, v. 38, p. 479-491, 2006.

BEGON, M.; TOWNSEND, C. R.; HARPER, J. L. Ecologia de indivíduos a ecossistemas. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2007.

BIANCHINI, E.; PIMENTA, J. A.; SANTOS, F. A. M. Spatial and temporal variation in the canopy cover in a Tropical Semi-Deciduous Forest. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, v. 44, p. 269-276, 2009.

CAVALCANTI, A. D. C. et al. Mudanças floríticas e estruturais, após cinco anos, em uma comunidade de caatinga no Estado de Pernambuco, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 23, n. 3, p. 905-907, 2009.

CONDIT, R. et al. Predicting population trends from size distributions: a direct test in a tropical tree community. The American Naturalist, v. 152, p. 495-509, 1998.

DALANESI, P. E.; OLIVEIRA-FILHO A. T.; FONTES, M. A. L. Flora e estrutura do componente arbóreo da floresta do Parque Ecológico Quedas do Rio Bonito, Lavras, MG e correlações entre a distribuição das espécies e variáveis ambientais. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 18, p. 737-757, 2004.

DEWALT, S. J.; SCHNITZER, S. A.; DENSLOW, J. S. Density and diversity of lianas along a chronosequence in a central Panamanian lowland forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, v. 16, p. 1-19, 2003.

DUFRÊNE, M.; LEGENDRE, P. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, v. 67, n. 3, p. 345-366, 1997.

EMBRAPA. Manual de métodos de análise de solos. Brasília: EMBRAPA, 1997. 212 p.

EMBRAPA. Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação de Solos. Critérios para distinção de classes de solos e de fases de unidades de mapeamento. Rio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA-SNLCS, 1988. 312 p.

FERRAZ, E. M. N.; RODAL, M. J. N.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B. Physiognomy and structure of vegetation along na altitudinal gradient in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Phytocoenologia, v. 33, p. 71-92, 2003.

FERRAZ, E. M. N. et al. Composição florística em trechos de vegetação de caatinga e brejo de altitude na região do Vale do Pajeú, Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, v. 21, p. 7-15, 1998.

GOMES, A. P. S.; RODAL, M. J. N.; MELO, A. L. Florística e fitogeografia da vegetação arbustiva subcaducifólia da Chapada de São José, Buíque, PE, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 20, p. 37-48, 2006.

GOULD, W. A.; GONZÀLEZ, G.; CARRERO, R. G. Structure and composition of vegetation along an elevational gradient in Puerto Rico. Journal of Vegetation Science, v. 17, p. 653-664, 2006.

JACOMINE, P. K. T. et al. Levantamento exploratório – reconhecimento de solos do Estado de Pernambuco. Recife: EMBRAPA - Divisão de Pesquisa Pedológica, 1973. 359 p.

KING, D. A. The adaptive significance of tree height. American Naturalist, v. 135, p. 809-828, 1990.

McCUNE, B.; MEFFORD, M. J. PC-ORD version 4.0., multivariate analysis of ecological data, Users guide. Glaneden Beach: MjM Software Design, 1999.

MELO, N. Áreas de exceção da Paraíba e dos Sertões de Pernambuco. Recife: SUDENE, 1988. 321 p.

MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D.; ELLENBERG, H. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: John Willey & Sons, 1974. 512 p.

MURPHY, P. G.; LUGO, A. E. Dry forests of Central America and Caribbean islands. In: BULLOCK, S. H; MOONEY, H. A.; MEDINA (Eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 9-34.

PEREIRA, I. M. et al. Regeneração Natural em um remanescente de caatinga sob diferentes níveis de perpetuação, no Agreste paraibano. Acta Botanica Brasilica, v. 15, p. 413-426, 2001.

POWERS, J. S. et al. Diversity and structure of regenerating tropical dry forests in Costa Rica: Geographic patterns and environmental drivers. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 258, p. 959-970, 2009.

RODAL, M. J. N.; COSTA, K. C. C.; LINS-E-SILVA, A. C. B. Estrutura da vegetação caducifólia espinhosa (caatinga) de uma área do sertão central de Pernambuco. Hoehnea, São Paulo, v. 35, p. 209-217, 2008a.

RODAL, M. J. N.; MARTINS, F. R.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B. Levantamento quantitativo das plantas lenhosas em trechos de vegetação de caatinga em Pernambuco. Revista Caatinga, v. 21, p. 192-205, 2008b.

RODAL, M. J. N.; SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B. A Vegetação do Bioma Caatinga. In: SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B. et al. (Orgs.). Vegetação e flora da caatinga. Recife: Associação de Plantas do Nordeste e Centro Nordestino de Informações sobre Plantas, 2002. p. 11-24.

SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B. Fitossociologia. In: SAMPAIO, E. V. S. B.; MAYO, S. J.; BARBOSA, E M. R. V. (Eds.). Pesquisa Botânica do Nordeste: progresso e perspectivas. Recife: Sociedade Botânica do Brasil, 1996. 224 p.

SEGURA, G. et al. Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Plant Ecology, v. 169, p. 259-271, 2003.

TER BRAAK, C. J. F. Ordination. In: JONGMAN, R. H. G.; TER BRAAK, C. J. F.; VAN TONGEREN, O. F. R. (Eds.). Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 91-173.

TREJO, I.; DIRZO, R. Floristic diversity of Mexican seasonally dry tropical forests. Biodiversity Conservation, v. 11, p. 2048-2063, 2002.

VELOSO, H. P. et al. Classificação vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1991. 123 p.

WIRTH, R; WEBER, B; RYEL, R. J. Spatial and temporal variability of canopy structure in a tropical moist forest. Acta Oecologia, v. 22, p. 235-244, 2001.

ZAR, J. H. Biostatistical analysis. 4. ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1999. 663 p.

Published

2016-06-20

How to Cite

Farias, S. G. G. de, Rodal, M. J. N., Melo, A. L. de, Silva, M. A. M., & Lima, A. L. A. de. (2016). PHYSIOGNOMY AND VEGETATION STRUCTURE IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS OF “CAATINGA” IN “SERRA TALHADA” PERNAMBUCO STATE, BRAZIL. Ciência Florestal, 26(2), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509822745

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)