Diagnóstico Ambiental do Corede norte, RS: Mapeamento do uso da Terra na Região Alto Uruguai e obtenção de Banco de dados Relacional de Fragmentos de Vegetação Arbórea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9501Abstract
Technological developments enabled the development of fieldequipment and laboratory that facilitate the production and analysis ofenvironmental data with a spatial accuracy increasing. Thus, the mappinginformation on the use and occupation of the land, among other things,has become an important tool to study the dynamics of the landscape Thisstudy was conducted in the region called Alto Uruguai Gaucho, covering31 citys belonging to this geographical space. Objective was to analyze andcharacterize the environmentally study area through the preparation ofthematic maps and letters and the structuring of a relational database, as acontribution to the organization of local environmental plans, and seek toidentify areas of native forest for the biodiversity of conservation. Themethodology involved the positioning system to field, relational mappingof hypsometry, clinografia, delineation and codification of watershed riverbasins by of Otto Pfafstetter method, classification soil according to thereport 30 of the State Department of Agriculture, mapping the areas ofpreservation and conservation, use classification and land tenure and, finally,the mapping of areas where use conflicts. As a result we obtained on aregional and municipal level, the thematic mapping multipurpose scale1:50.000. Getting the new relational database corrected hydrography andmunicipal boundaries and updated the road network.The fragments mapof arboreal vegetation presents the region as characterized by an agriculturalmatrix with a significant number of fragments that have a rate of (itypical)and have an average area of 3.86 hectares. The availability of informationobtained for both municipalities and municipal and state agencies and for the development contributes effectively involved in planning for municipalenvironmental management and municipal and regional articulated.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
