Dynamometer prototype to assess muscle strength in wheelchair users. First part: literature review and simulation of the dynamic model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X92207Keywords:
Dynamometer, Manual wheelchair, Propulsion cycle, Movement of wheelchair users in real environmentsAbstract
This paper presents a detailed literature review on the main aspects of a low-cost experimental dynamometer model designed to assess the muscular strength of wheelchair users. In this context, the literature review covers the propulsion cycle of the manual wheelchair, typically segmented into contact and recovery phases, with biomechanical studies investigating the forces applied, joint movements and propulsive efficiency in various techniques and conditions. Additionally, the review explores the movement of wheelchair users in real environments, emphasizing the diversity of terrains and the demands on muscular strength in daily activities, which underscores the importance of a dynamometer that reflects the practical use of the wheelchair. Finally, the application of MATLAB$/Simulink in the simulation of dynamometer models and biomechanical systems is discussed, highlighting its potential to model, analyze and optimize the design of the proposed dynamometer before its physical implementation. In summary, this review establishes the theoretical basis for the development of an accessible dynamometer, integrating knowledge about propulsion, real movements and computational simulation tools, aiming at a more pertinent assessment of the muscular strength of wheelchair users and, consequently, contributing to their physical assessment, rehabilitation and quality of life.
Downloads
References
Ashwindran, S., Azizuddin, A., & Oumer, A. (2023). A low-cost digital torquemeter coordinated by arduino board. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 15(1):118–130.
Baumgart, J. K., Brurok, B., & Sandbakk, Ø. (2020). Comparison of peak oxygen uptake between upper-body exercise modes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology, 11:412.
Boninger, M. L., Souza, A. L., Cooper, R. A., Fitzgerald, S. G., Koontz, A. M., & Fay, B. T. (2002). Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 83(5):718–723.
Brouha, L. & Krobath, H. (1967). Continuous recording of cardiac and respiratory functions in normal and handicapped people. Human factors, 9(6):567–571.
de Barros Lombardi Jr, A. & Dedini, F. G. (2009). Biomechanical model for the determination of forces on upper-extremity members during standard wheelchair propulsion. Mathematical and computer modelling, 49(7-8):1288–1294.
De Klerk, R., Vegter, R. J. K., Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L., Mason, B. S., Lenton, J. P., Veeger, D. H., & Van Der Woude, L. H. (2019). Measuring handrim wheelchair propulsion in the lab: a critical analysis of stationary ergometers. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 13:199-211.
Gagnon, D. H., Jouval, C., & Ch´enier, F. (2016). Estimating pushrim temporal and kinetic measures using an instrumented treadmill during wheelchair propulsion: A concurrent validity study. Journal of biomechanics, 49(9):1976–1982.
Glaser, R. M., Sawka, M. N., Laubach, L. L., & Suryaprasad, A. G. (1979). Metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to wheelchair and bicycle ergometry. Journal of Applied Physiology, 46(6):1066–1070.
Goosey-Tolfrey, V. L. & Moss, A. D. (2005). Wheelchair velocity of tennis players during propulsion with and without the use of racquets. Adapted physical activity quarterly, 22(3):291–301.
Horvat, M. A., Golding, L. A., Beutel-Horvat, T., & McConnell, T. J. (1984). A treadmill modification for wheelchairs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55(3):297–301.
Kwarciak, A. M., Yarossi, M., Ramanujam, A., Dyson-Hudson, T. A., & Sisto, S. A. (2009). Evaluation of wheelchair tire rolling resistance using dynamometer-based coast- down tests. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 46(7).
Maheriya, S. & Parikh, P. (2016). A review: Modelling of brushed dc motor and various type of control methods. Journal for Research, 1.
Martin, X., Tordi, N., Bougenot, M., & Rouillon, J. (2002). Analyse critique des mat´eriels et des m´ethodes d’´evaluation de l’aptitude physique chez le bless´e m´edullaire en fauteuil roulant. Science & Sports, 17(5):209–219.
Masse, L. C. & Lamontagne, M. (1992). Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 29(3).
Mathworks (2025). Estimate parameters from measured data. https://la.mathworks.com/help/sldo/gs/estimate-parameters-from-measured-data-using-the-gui.html. Acessado em: 22 de maio de 2025.
Oliveira, S., Bione, A. A., Oliveira, L., Costa, A., Guimar˜aes, F., & Costa, M. (2017). The compact wheelchair roller dynamometer. Sports Medicine International Open, 1:E119–E127.
Rahman, N. & Yahya, N. (2021). A mathematical model of a brushed dc motor system. Data Analytics and Applied Mathematics (DAAM), pages 60–68.
Rao, S. S., Bontrager, E. L., Gronley, J., Newsam, C. J., & Perry, J. (1996). Three-dimensional kinematics of wheelchair propulsion. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 4(3):152–160.
Rodrigues da Silva, M., Marques, F., Tavares da Silva, M., & Flores, P. (2023). A comprehensive review on biomechanical modeling applied to device-assisted locomotion. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30(3):1897–1960.
Shimada, S. D., Robertson, R. N., Bonninger, M. L., & Cooper, R. A. (1998). Kinematic characterization of wheelchair propulsion. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 35(2):210–218.
Silva, D. C., Paschoarelli, L. C., & Medola, F. O. (2019). Evaluation of two wheelchair hand rim models: contact pressure distribution in straight line and curve trajectories. Ergonomics, 62(12):1563–1571.
Vanlandewijck, Y., Theisen, D., & Daly, D. (2001). Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports. Sports medicine, 31:339–367.
Wieczorek, B., Kukla, M., Warguła, Ł., G´orecki, J., & Berdychowski, M. (2019). Design and engineering of a test stand for testing human-wheelchair anthropotechnical systems. Research on the Biomechanics of Manual Wheelchair Drive for Innovative Manual and Hybrid Drives, pages 41–51.
Wieczorek, B. & Sydor, M. (2024). Laboratory assessment of manual wheelchair propulsion. Applied Sciences, 14(22):10737.
Wieczorek, B. & Warguła, Ł. (2019). Problems of dynamometer construction for wheelchairs and simulation of push motion. In MATEC Web of Conferences, volume 254, page 01006. EDP Sciences.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
