Innovation in construction: mortars with delayed setting times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X92196Keywords:
Mortar, Iron nanoparticles, Setting time of cement pasteAbstract
The mortar an essential material in masonry and finishing works has its workability defined by its initial and final setting times, which govern its internal cohesion and application window. Factors such as the watertocement ratio, curing temperature, and admixtures directly influence these parameters, with traditional retarders proving effective in tropical climates. Studies have shown that adding iron nanoparticles can extend the setting intervals by modifying the hydration kinetics while preserving the structural characteristics of the cementitious matrix. This research systematically investigates the incorporation of FeNPs into mortars, using standardized tests to quantify changes in setting times and to correlate the presence of the nanomaterial with the hardening phases and composite stability. The results indicated that adding iron nanoparticles broadens the workability window compared to the conventional mix without admixtures, highlighting the potential of these particles as setting retarders under tropical climatic conditions.Downloads
References
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 7711: Agregados para concreto – Especificação. Rio de janeiro. 2005.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 13529: Revestimento de paredes e tetos de argamassas inorgânicas. Rio de janeiro. 1995.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 16606: Cimento Portland – Determinação da Pasta de Consistência Normal. Rio de janeiro. 2017.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 16607: Cimento Portland – Determinação do tempo de pega. Rio de janeiro. 2018.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 16697: Cimento Portland – Requisitos. Rio de janeiro. 2018.
BRITO, A. C. de. Gestão e Controle de Qualidade nos Procedimentos Referentes a Revestimento Argamassado. [manuscrito] / Antonio Carlos de Brito. – 2016. 44 f., enc.: il.
CAMPOS, G. M.; MACIOSKI, G.; CASALI, J. M. Estudo do tempo de início de pega de argamassas com aditivo estabilizador de hidratação. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DO CONCRETO, 55., 2014, Curitiba. Anais… Curitiba: IBRACON, 2014.
CAMPOS NETO, T. F.; GEYER, A. L. B. Efeitos do uso de aditivo com nanosílica na consistência e resistência mecânica do concreto. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais, São Paulo, v. 12, n. 2, p. 371-385, abr. 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952019000200009. Acesso em: 07 maio 2025.
LIU, J.; JIN, H.; GU, C.; YANG, Y. (2019) Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on early-age hydration and the mechanical properties of cement paste. Constr Build Mater 217:352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.027
MARTINS, V. C. Otimização dos processos de dosagem e proporciona mento do concreto dosado em central com a utilização de aditivos: Estudo de caso. 2005. 198f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2005.
MEHTA, P. K; MONTEIRO, J. M. P. Concreto: Microestrutura, propriedades e materiais. 4. ed. São Paulo: IBRACON, 2014.
NEVILLE, A. M. Propriedades do concreto. 5.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2016.
NERES, M. A.; BOITA, J. Confecção de um aparelho de Vicat com instrumentação alternativa de baixo custo: ensaio de início de pega em pasta de cimento. Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, v. 46, n. esp. 3, e87043, 08 nov. 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X87043. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2025.
SENFF, L.; TOBALDI, D. M.; LEMES-RACHADEL, P. et al (2014) The influence of TiO2 and ZnO powder mixtures on photocatalytic activity and rheological behavior of cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 65:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.121
SILVA, C.; MELO, G. Estudo do comportamento da pega da argamassa com adição de sacarose: início de pega e índice de consistência. 2021. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) – Instituto Federal de Goiás, Campus Anápolis, Anápolis, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ifg.edu.br/bitstream/prefix/1634/3/tcc_%20Caio%20Silva_Gabriel%20Melo.pdf. Acesso em: 2 mar. 2025
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência e Natura

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

