Lista de espécies de aranhas da região central do Rio Grande do Sul - Família Araneidae

Authors

  • Leocadia Falkemberg Indrusiak Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.
  • Regina Gressler Buss Cachoeira do Sul, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27236

Abstract

A list of 58 spiders (Family Araneidae) from the central
region of Rio Grande do Sul State (Brazil) is presented. It is also
reported for the first time the occurrence of Alpaida lanei Levi, 1998,
Alpaida scriba (Mello-Leitão, 1940) and Araneus sicki Levi, 1991 for
this region

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERRIEL, L.P. Aranhas e insetos capturados com guarda-chuva

entomológico em uma área campestre/pioneira de Santa Maria, RS, Brasil - I. Eryngium horridum Malme, 1904 (Umbelliferae). Santa Maria, RS, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, XI + 59p,2001. Monografia de Especialização, não publicada).

BUSS, R.G. Araneofauna arborícola da região de Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul. Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Fundação Educacional do Vale do Jacuí / Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 79 p., 1993. (Monografia de Especialização, não publicada).

INDRUSIAK, L.F.; KOTZIAN, C.B. Inventário das aranhas arborícolas de três regiões de Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Rev. Ciência e Natura, Santa Maria, v.20, p. 187 - 214, 1998.

LEMA,T. Relações herpetofaunísticas do Rio Grande do Sul com os países vizinhos. Veritas, Porto Alegre, v. 29, n.115, p. 421 - 429, 1984.

LEVI, H. W. The spiny orb-weaver genera Micrathena and Chaetacis (Araneae: Araneidae). Buli. Mus. Comp. Zool., V. 150, n. 8, p. 429-618,1985.

LEVI , H. W. The neotropical orb-weaving spiders of the genus A/paida (Araneae: Araneidae). Buli. Mus. Comp. Zool., v.151, n. 7, p.365- 487,1988.

LEVI, H. W. a) The neotropical and mexican species of the orbweaver genera Araneus, Dubiepeira and Aculepeira (Araneae: Araneidae). Buli. Mus. Comp. Zoo/.,v. 152, n. 4, p. 167 - 315, 1991.

________ b) The neotropical orb-weaver genera Edricus and

Wagneriana (Araneae; Araneidae). Buli. Mus. Comp. Zool., V.

, n. 6, p. 363 - 415,1991.

MELLO-LEITÃO, C. de Catálogo das aranhas do Rio Grande do Sul. Arq. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, V. 37, p. 150 - 244, 1943.

PEREIRA, P.R.B.; GARCIA NETTO, L.R.; BORIN, C.J.A.; BARROSSARTORI, M.G. Contribuição à geografia física do Município de Santa Maria: Unidades de Paisagem. Geografia - Ensino e Pesquisa, Santa Maria, v.3, p. 37 - 68. 1989.

Downloads

Published

2003-12-09

How to Cite

Indrusiak, L. F., & Buss, R. G. (2003). Lista de espécies de aranhas da região central do Rio Grande do Sul - Família Araneidae. Ciência E Natura, 25(25), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27236

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 25, N. 25, 2003

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.