Investigate The Relationship Between Cost Management Strategy, Organization Size, Growth Options and The Performance Of Companies In Tehran Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Moslem Sedaghati DQ-CCNE/UFSM
  • Hamid Ravanpak Noodezh
  • Ali Amiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20837

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cost management strategy, organization size and growth Options on the performance of the company. In this regard, the financial statements of 76 companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange for the years 2009 to 2013 were analyzed. In this study, cost management strategy (the ratio of capital expenditure to sales, sales of the book value of fixed assets) and size (natural logarithm of total assets) and growth Options (market value of assets to book value of assets) as a variable. independent, and firm performance (return on assets, sales growth) was used as the dependent variable, so that the relationship between strategy, size, growth Options and firm performance during a 5-year period studied. The method used for data collection, library and field. To test the hypotheses of the model Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and generalized regression model, the conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) were analyzed using the software Eviews8. And significance was determined using a Z score and likelihood ratio. The criteria for the variable sales strategy to sell the book value of fixed assets and the capital expenditure of a significant and positive relationship with sales growth. In the capital, Tehran Stock Exchange Market participants are recommended to consider it as the time-varying volatility and time efficiencies associated with corporate assets can be public relations strategy, cost management and growth Options of the company described. Also associated with the company's sales growth can be described by the relationship between the size and cost management strategy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-21

How to Cite

Sedaghati, M., Noodezh, H. R., & Amiri, A. (2015). Investigate The Relationship Between Cost Management Strategy, Organization Size, Growth Options and The Performance Of Companies In Tehran Stock Exchange. Ciência E Natura, 37, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20837

Issue

Vol. 37 (2015): SPECIAL EDITION - PART 1

Section

Special Edition

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.