Development of a package for conveying helicoids
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40626Keywords:
Transport, Packaging, HelicoidsAbstract
To facilitate the transportation and storage of products, packaging plays a key role. The present article refers to the development of a project, which aimed to develop a packaging for the transport of heavy parts from the agricultural sector, especially for helicoids used in harves ters, in order to optimize the loading and unloading time, considering protection aspects during transportation and reliability in delivery. The present work was carried out from the survey of customer requirements and subsequently weighted and hierarchized through the quality function deployment tool. B ased on the importance of customer requirements, project requirements were elaborated with expert input. Then the conceptual framework of the product was developed. F rom the main functions, secondary functions were defined to create packaging designs, where two combinations of possible solutions were presented, one using wood as the main raw material and the other made using rotomolded plastic. The project was detailed and the wood packaging prototy pe was created considering also the costs.
Downloads
References
ADLMAIER, D.; SELLITTO, M.A. Embalagens retornáveis para transporte de bens manufaturados: um estudo de caso em logística reversa. Produção, vol.17 no.2 São Paulo May/Aug. 2007.
CARNEVALLI, J. A.; SASSI, A. C.; MIGUEL, P. A. C. et al. Aplicação do QFD no desenvolvimento de produtos:
levantamento sobre seu uso e perspectivas para pesquisas futuras. Gestão & Produção, v. 11, n. 1, p. 33–49, 2004.
EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, p. 301-17, 2005.
FREITAS, F.L.; FERREIRA, M.P.; MATSUO, T.K.; FORCELLINI, F.A.; OROFINO, M.A.R. Processo de desenvolvimento de produto: aplicação em um Projeto de p&d dentro do programa aneel. XXIV Seminário Nacional de Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de empresas; Belém, Pará, 2014.
INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA E ESTATISTICA APLICA (IPEA). Agricultura: evolução e importância para a balança comercial brasileira. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.- Brasília : Rio de Janeiro, 2014.
LAUTENSCHLAGER, B. I. Avaliação de embalagem de consumo com base nos requisitos ergonômicos informacionais.
Dissertação (Mestrado em Física) - UFSC, 2001.
MARINI, V.; ROMANO, L. Influencing factors in agricultural machinery design. Product: Management & Development, v.
, n. 2, p. 111–130, 2009.
MINISTERIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO (MAPA). Projeções do Agronegócio Mundial e Brasil 2006/2007 a 2017/2018. 2004 [cited 2019 AGO 11]. Available from: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/politica- agricola/todas-publicacoes-de-politica-agricola/projecoes-do-agronegocio.
MONTOYA, M. A. O agronegócio no Mercosul: dimensão econômica, desenvolvimento industrial e interdependência estrutural na Argentina, Brasil, Chile e Uruguai. Revista Brasileira de Economia; vol.56 no.4 Rio de Janeiro Oct./Dec. 2002.
MORALES, S. R.; MORABITO, R.; WIDMER, J. A. Otimização do carregamento de produtos paletizados em caminhões. Gestão & Produção, v. 4, n. 2, p. 234–250, 1997.
NOGUEIRA, J.G.; DE ABREU, J. A.P.; PAIXÃO, C.H.S.; OLIVIERA, R.C. A embalagem como componente estratégico do marketing para lançamento do produto. CPMARK, Caderno Profissional de Marketing – UNIMEP, v.3, n.1, 2015.
POLI, G.; PUREZA, V. Um algoritmo de busca tabu para o carregamento de contêineres com caixas idênticas. Gestão & Produção, v. 19, n. 2, p. 323–326, 2012.
ROMEIRO, E.; FERREIRA, C. V.; MIGUEL, P. A. C.; et al., Projeto do Produto. 1 ed. São Paulo: Campus, 2009.
ROZENFELD, H.; FORCELLINI, F. A.; AMARAL, D.C.; TOLEDO, J. C.; SILVA, S. L.; ALLIPRANDINI, D.H.;
SCALICE, R. K. Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produtos: Uma referência para a melhoria do produto. São Paulo: Editora
Saraiva, 2006.
SALES, A.M.G.; NAVEIRO, R.M. Modelo de processo de desenvolvimento de produtos e ciclo de vida de projetos do guia pmbok - uma análise comparativa. XXX Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção, São Carlos, Sãao Paulo, 2010.
SCHIMMELFENIG, C.; SANTOS, D.; BERNIERI, E. Inovação de embalagens. Revista de Administração e Ciências
Contábeis do IDEAU, v. 4, n. 9, p. 1–15, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
