Profile Analysis of Rural Entrepreneurs of a Municipality of the Central Region of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40598Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur Profile, Innovation, Rural property managementAbstract
For a long time the concepts of economic growth and entrepreneurship were understood as essential for the development of a country. Schumpeter introduced the concept of entrepreneurship, seeking to reinforce the association between entrepreneur and innovation as a proportioning element of economic development. According to Schumpeter (1982), entrepreneur is the person who can convert an idea or invention into a successful innovation. The current developmental framework of society and the constant economic, social and cultural transformations contribute significantly to the changes in the ways of thinking and acting of contemporary man. This study aims to analyze and understand the entrepreneurial profile of a municipality in the central region of Rio Grande do Sul State. Regarding the method, it is classified as a quantitative study (survey) composed of closed questions with Likert scale elaborated based on in literature. The research results allowed us to understand the profile of entrepreneurs, characteristics, types of investments, level of competitiveness, degrees of behavior, etc. Findings are of paramount importance for growth, new business propositions, new business conceptions, new opportunities. Brazil is a country where people aspire for technology, innovation and creativity. As a result, the study made it possible to understand the entrepreneur of rural entrepreneurs, and to verify that in recent years, there have been changes in production cultures, the need for technological adaptations, and the search for management knowledge, to maintain the competitiveness and economic growth of companies.
Downloads
References
BUCHA, A. I. Empreendedorismo, aprender a saber ser empreendedor (1ª ed.). Lisboa: Editora RH, Lda, 2009.
DUARTE, E. C. V. G. de, Sarfati, G., Machado, J. P., Felix, J. C., Pansarella, L., Aidar, M., Neto, M. T., Salusse, M., Fernandes, R. R., Ozon, R. H., Friedlaender, R. H. Jr., Greco, S. M. S. S. de, Andreassi, T., Moroz, V., & Nassif, V, 2011.
GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: empreendedorismo no Brasil (Relatório de Pesquisa/2011). Curitiba: IBQP. Recuperado de http://www.ibqp.org.br/upload/tiny_mce/Empreendedorismo%20no%20Brasil%202011.pdf
GLOBAL Entrepreneurship Monitor. Empreendedorismo no Brasil. Recuperado de http://gestaoportal.sebrae.com.br/customizado/estudos-e-pesquisas/temas estrategicos/empreendedorismo/Livro%20GEM%20Brasil%202011.pdf , 2014.
HAIR, J.R.; BABIN, B.; MONEY, A.H.; SAMOUEL, P. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Tradução Lene Belon Ribeiro. Bookman, Porto Alegre, 2014. p. 471.
HEINONEN, J., & POIKKIJOKI, SARI-ANNE. entrepreneurial-directed approach to entrepreneurship education: mission impossible? Journal of Management Development, 25(1), 80-94, 2006.
LEITE, E., MELO, N. M. Uma nova noção de empresário: a naturalização do “empreendedor”. Revista de Sociologia e Política. V. 16, n. 31, p. 35-47, novembro/2008.
LUDWIG VON MISES, Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (FEE ed.) [1949]
MARS, M. M.; RIOS-AGUILAR, C. Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education. Higher Education, v. 59, n. 4, p. 441- 460, 2010.
MONTGOMERY, D. C. Introdução ao controle estatístico da qualidade 4. ed. [S.l.]: E Fourth Edition, 2001.
MORRISON. Multivariate statistical methods. 2. ed. International Student Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1984. 412p
NAZIR, M. A., & RAMZAN. Contribution on entrepreneurship in economic growth. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4, 3, 273-294, 2012.
ONLINE PESQUISA. Perfil do Empreendedor de Cachoeira do Sul [Internet]. 2019 Feb 12 [cited 2019 feb 12]. Available from: https://www.onlinepesquisa.com
PEREIRA, J.C.R. Processamento e Análise de Variáveis Qualitativas. In: Análise de dados qualitativos: estratégias metodológicas para ciências saúde, humanas e sociais. São Paulo: Edusp. p.77-99, 1999.
SCHUMPETER, J.A. Teoria do Desenvolvimento Econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1982
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
