System of assesment and determination of battery life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40488Keywords:
Renewable load, Batteries, LifespanAbstract
Technology is rooted in the way of life of society and its consumption is increasing, influencing the technological advance, an example of this growing are the mobile phones that according to ANATEL data, in Brazil there are over 228.9 million in use. It is evident the benefits that the technological advance has been providing to society, however it is noteworthy that the electronics have substances toxic to the environment, such a s lead, nickel, cadmium and others that if incorrectly discarded can contaminate the soil even reach the groundwater. thus causing water contamination and compromising the supply of the region, these facts highlight the environmental concern, because it is necessary to adopt measures in front of the env ironmental damages. Given this perspective, the present work aims to analyze the battery life of discarded devices, often the devices are discarded and their battery is also discarded, e ven if it has not completely reached its useful life. To find the current capacity of the battery, the battery current is drained and multiplied by the evaluation time. If the result of the current capacity is less than 80% compared to the nominal battery capacity, it is concluded that it is degraded.
Downloads
References
ANATEL (Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações). Citação de referências e documentos eletrônicos. Disponível em:
http:// www.anatel.gov.br/Portal. Acesso em: abril de 2019.
BUSNARDO, N. G.; PAULINO, J. F.; AFONSO, J. C. Recuperação de Cobalto e de lítio de baterias íon-lítio usadas. Química Nova, Rio de Janeiro, v.30, n.4, 995-1000, 2007.
Catálogo técnico “Baterias Tudor”, 2010.
DRESCH, RODOLFO DE FREITAS VALLE; LOUREIRO, LUIZ TIARAJÚ DOS REIS. Método de análise do estado de carga restante de baterias de celulares. Porto Alegre, 2010; 53(15-16).
Global E-waste Monitor 2017. Citação de referências e documentos eletrônicos. Disponível em: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU- D/Climate-Change/Pages/Global-E-waste-Monitor-2017.aspx. Acesso em: julho de 2019.
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). Citação de referência e documentos eletrônicos. Disponível em: https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/pnsb/lixo_coletado/lixo_coletado110.shtm. Acesso em: julho de 2019.
MAWAKDIYE, Alberto (2007) Meio Ambiente - Poluição eletrônica. Revista da Indústria, 129 (7), p. 50-53, jun. 2007.
Norma Brasileira“Acumulador de Chumbo-Ácido Estacionário Regulado por Válvula – Método de Ensaio”, ABNT NBR
, Segunda Edição, 2011.
PASCOE, P.E.; ANBUKY, A.H. Estimation of VRLA Battery Capacity Using the Analysis of the “Coup de Fouet” Region.
Proceedings of the 21 International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC). 1999.
RICE AS, FARQUHAR-SMITH WP, BRIDGES D, BROOKS JW. Canabinoids and pain. In: Dostorovsky JO, Carr DB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Pain; 2002 Aug 17-22; San Diego, CA. Seattle (WA): IASP Press; c2003. p. 437-68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
