A ARGUMENTAÇÃO EM MATEMÁTICA NA INTERAÇÃO COM TECNOLOGIAS

Authors

  • Nilce Fátima Scheffer URI - Campus de Erechim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9352

Abstract

This paper aims to present the result from a research conducted with studentsand teachers from Elementary and High School about the “Valuationof argumentation in mathematics classes, from the interpretation of functiongraphs on the TI-83 Graphing Calculator and on the software Winplot “.This paper presents theoretical reflections about the Language and its formsof Representation, the production of argumentation regarding interpretativesituations of mathematics besides Computing Technologies and MathematicsEducation. The study took place in three moments, on Scientific Initiationwhere one has revealed the occurrence of argumentative expressions inthe language of the students, on the Extension when was developed computingworkshops with students and teachers of High School, moment wheninformation were collected from records of the sessions, and in the thirdmoment that was with the Course Conclusion Work. With that the studywas completed, focusing basically on the analysis of argumentation presentin narratives and verbal, nonverbal and written languages of math teachersof High School. This text was produced and presented in a lecture developed at the Second Winter School of Mathematics Education which took place atthe Federal University of Santa Maria - RS UFSM in 2010.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nilce Fátima Scheffer, URI - Campus de Erechim

Departamento de Ciencias Exatas e da Terra Área Educação Matemática Grupo de Pesquisa em Informática Tecnologias e Educação Matemática - URI

Downloads

Published

2012-10-10

How to Cite

Scheffer, N. F. (2012). A ARGUMENTAÇÃO EM MATEMÁTICA NA INTERAÇÃO COM TECNOLOGIAS. Ciência E Natura, 34(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X9352

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 1 (2012)

Section

Mathematics

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.