On a level-set regularization strategy for the identification of a piecewise constant rigidity coefficient in a beam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X90522Keywords:
Level-set regularization, Piecewise constant stiffness coefficient, Beams, Euler-BernoulliAbstract
In this work, we analyze a level set regularization strategy to identify the constant piecewise stiffness coefficient in a static Euler-Bernoulli beam, based on indirect deflection measurements. The theoretical results presented are illustrated by some numerical simulations.
Downloads
References
Brezis, H. (2010). Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Springer Science & Business Media.
Cezaro, A., Leit˜ao, A., & Tai, X.-C. (2009). On multiple level-set regularization methods for inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 25(3), 035004. Retrived from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0266–5611/25/3/035004. doi: 10.1088/0266–5611/25/3/035004.
Cezaro, A., Leit˜ao, A., & Tai, X.-C. (2013). On piecewise constant level-set (pcls) methods for the identication of discontinuous parameters in ill-posed problems. Inverse Problems, 29(1), 015003.
Evans, L. & Gariepy, R. (1992). Measure theory and fine properties of functions. (Studies in Advanced Mathematics). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gladwell, G. M. & Morassi, A. (2010). A family of isospectral Euler-Bernoulli beams. Inverse problems, 26(3), 035006.
Hibbeler, R. (2006). Resistˆencia dos Materiais. (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kaltenbacher, B., Neubauer, A., & Scherzer, O. (2008). Iterative regularization methods for nonlinear ill-posed problems. (6th vol. Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.
Kawano, A. (2017). Uniqueness in the determination of unknown coefficients of an Euler-Bernoulli beam equation with observation in an arbitrary small interval of time. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 452(1), 351–360.
Kirsh, A. (2011). An introduction to the mathematical theory of inverse problems, volume (120th vol.). Springer Science & Business Media.
Lerma, A. & Hinestroza, D. (2017). Coefficient identification in the Euler-Bernoulli equation using regularization methods. Applied Math. Modelling, 41, 223–235.
Lesnic, D., Elliott, L., & Ingham, D. (1999). Analysis of coefficient identification problems associated to the inverse Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 62(2), 101–116.
Marinov, T., Marinova, R., & Vatsala, A. (2015). Coefficient identification in Euler-Bernoulli equation from over-posed data. Neural, Parallel, and Scientific Computations, 23(2), 193–218.
Marinov, T. & Vatsala, A. (2008). Inverse problem for coefficient identification in the Euler-Bernoulli equation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56(2), 400–410.
Medeiros, E. (2019). Identificação do coeficiente de rigidez no modelo de Euler-Bernoulli para vigas. (Master’s thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Medeiros, E., Cezaro, A., & Cezaro, F. T. (2023). Uniqueness and regularization in the flexural stiffness coefficient identification problem for a statically determined Euler–Bernoulli beam. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 126, 107486.
Medeiros, E., Cezaro, A., & Travessini de Cezaro, F. (2022). M´etodos iterativos de regularização para identificação do coeficiente de rigidez na equac¸ ˜ao de Euler-Bernoulli para vigas. Trends in Computational and Applied Mathematics, 23(2), 363–382.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
