Optimization of reinforced concrete structures using population-based metaheuristic algorithms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X74927Keywords:
Constrained Optimization, Evolutionary algorithms, Reinforced concreteAbstract
For many industrial activities, ideal projects are achieved by comparing the solution of alternative projects with those already executed. The feasibility of solutions plays an important role in these activities. For example, the underlying objective (cost, profit, etc.) estimated for each project solution is calculated and the best solution is adopted. This is the usual procedure followed by many constructors due to time and resource limitations. However, in many cases, this method is followed simply by a lack of knowledge of existing optimization procedures. In this context, a comparative study of population-based metaheuristic algorithms applied to a case study of a reinforced concrete beam design reinforced with a polymer matrix with carbon fibers will be presented. Evolutionary algorithms have the ability to determine the optimal values of the design variables without disregarding the restrictions on ACI-318 and ACI-440 standards while minimizing the reinforcement area for each beam (cost). The comparative study shows that not all presented algorithms violated design constraints. In addition, it can be said that the values found for the design variables present a low dispersion around the mean value of the objective function.
Downloads
References
AKIN, A.; SAKA, M.P. Harmony search algorithm based optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete plane frames subject to ACI 318-05 provisions. Computers & Structures, 147, 79-95, 2015.
ARORA, J. S. Introduction to Optimum Design. Academic Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-15344-5
ATASHPAZ-GARGARI, E.; LUCAS, C. Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 4661-4667, 2007.
CERANIC, B.; FRYER, C.; BAINES, R. W. An application of simulated annealing to the optimum design of reinforced concrete retaining structures. Computers & Structures, 79, 1569-1581, 2001.
FERREIRA, C. C.; BARROS, M. H. F. M.; BARROS, A. F. M. Optimal design of reinforced concrete T-sections in bending. Engineering Structures, 25, 951-964, 2003.
KARABOGA, D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report, Erciyes University, 2005.
KAVEH, A., TALATAHARI, S. Optimum design of skeletal structures using imperialist competitive algorithm. Computers & Structures, 88, 1220–1229, 2010.
KAVEH, A.; BAKHSHPOORI, T. Metaheuristics: Outlines, MATLAB Codes and Examples. Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04067-3
KAVEH, A.; DADRAS, A. A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: thermal exchange optimization. Adv Eng Softw, 110,69–84, 2017.
KAVEH, A.; IZADIGARD, R. A.; MOTTAGHI, L. Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using
ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 2020.
KAYABEKIR, A. E.; BEKDAS, G.; NIGDELI, S. M. Metaheuristic Approaches for Optimum Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures: Emerging Research and Opportunities, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2664-4
KAYABEKIR, A. E.; SAYIN, B.; BEKDAS, G.; NIGDELI, S. M. The factor of optimum angle of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. In 4th International Conference on Engineering and Natural Sciences (ICENS 2018), 2018.
LI, M.; WONG, B. C. L.; LIU, Y.; CHAN, C. M.; GAN, V. J. L. CHENG, J. G. P. DfMA-oriented design optimization for steel reinforcement using BIM and hybrid metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 2021.
MERGOS, P. Optimum design of 3D reinforced concrete building frames with the flower pollination algorithm. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 2021.
NAYAK, S. Fundamentals Of Optimization Techniques With Algorithms. Elsevier, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-1-02539-9
RAO, R. V.; SAVSANI, V. J.; VAKHARIA, D. P. Teaching–learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput Aided Des, 43 (3), 303–315, 2011.
RAO, S. S. Engineering Optimization Theory and Practice. Wiley, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119454816
YANG, X. S. Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms. Elsevier, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-01368-0
YANG, X. S. Nature-Inspired Computation and Swarm Intelligence Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Elsevier, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-00628-0
YANG, X. S.; GANDOMI, A. H.; TALATAHARI, S.; ALAVI, A. H. Metaheuristics in Water, Geotechnical and Transport Engineering. Elsevier, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-07801-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.