The finitude of the periodic points of the Conway ordered sequence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X70592Keywords:
Fixed point, Function, Sequence, OrbitAbstract
In this paper, we present some properties of the Conway ordered sequence or counting sequence. Such properties are related to orbits and fixed points. Our main result is to determine a limitation for the number of digits in the orbit of any natural number x, that is, starting with any finite initial term, the sequence terms will have a length limited to a maximum of 21 digits, and therefore the orbits are relatively periodics.
Downloads
References
BRIER, É.; G.-S. R.; NACCACHE, D.; PACCO, A.; TROIANI, E. The look-and-say the biggest sequence eventually cycles. arXiv:200607246[math.D.S, math.CO], Cornell University, 2020a.
BRIER, É.; G-S. R.; NACCACHE, D.; PACCO, A.; TROIANI, E. Stuttering conway sequences are still conway sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:200606837[math.D.S, math.CO], Cornell University, 2020b.
BRONSTEIN, V.; FRAENKEL, A. S. On a curious property of counting sequences. The American Mathematical Monthly, [s.l.], v. 101, n. 6, p. 560–563, 1994.
CONWAY, J. H. The weird and wonderful chemistry of audioactive decay. Em In: COVER, T. M.; GOPINATH, B. (ed.). Open problems in communication and computation. Springer, New York, 173–188, 1987.
COSTA, E. A.; SANTOS, R. A. Contando algarismos. Revista da Olimpíada - IME - UFG, Goiânia, [s.l.], n. 14, p. 61–74, 2019.
DEVANEY, R. L. An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. 2. ed. CRC press: Boca Raton, 2018. 360 p.
GAIRÍIN, J. M.; OLLER, A. M.; MANERO, V.; MUÑOZ, J. M. (2017). La sucesión look and say. In: VIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación Matemática, 2017. Anais[...]. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 2018. p. 16–24.
MANERO GARCÍA, et al. Diseño e implementación de tareas de alta demanda cognitiva basadas en la sucesión look and say. Avances de investigación en educación matemática, [s.l.], n. 20, p. 161-183, 2021.
MARTÍN, Ó. Look-and-say biochemistry: Exponential rna and multistranded dna. The American Mathematical Monthly, [s.l.], v. 113, n. 4, p. 289–307, 2006.
OBMEP:BRASIL. Banco de Questões 2017. OBMEP - Olimpíada Brasileira de Matemática das Escolas Públicas, Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática. [S.l]: IMPA, 2017. Disponível em: www.obmep.org.br. Acesso em: 31/05/2022.
SLOANE, N. J., et al. The on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences. 2003. Disponível em: http://oeis.org/A005151. Acesso em: 31/05/2022.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.