Influence of hydrometeorological variations on the water quality of the low river Itajaí-Mirim, municipality of Itajaí (SC)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X55301Keywords:
Itajaí-Mirim River, Water Quality, HydrometeorologicalsAbstract
The Itajaí-Mirim River located in Santa Catarina, in the region of the low estuary of the Itajaí-Açu River, is the place where most of the water supplied for consumption is consumed by the Municipalities of Itajaí and Navegantes, the São Roque catchment station. This study aims to analyze the water quality in the Itajaí-Mirim river before and after the implantation of the dam in the Itajaí-Mirim river, based on a monitoring of physical-chemical parameters. The collections described in this report were carried out at six sample points, from January to December 2007, with the purpose of physically and chemically characterizing the environment in the rectified channel and, also, in the original bed of Itajaí-Mirim. The parameters measured in situ serve to assess the general state of water quality at the time of sampling. The main parameters measured, four of them deserve special attention (pH, Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen and Salinity) and the correlated environmental parameters were flow rate and precipitation. In general, depending on the main results obtained, the analyzed waters can be classified in Class 2 of fresh waters, according to the limit values of CONAMA Resolution No. 357/05, and for the sampled period, precipitation and flow influenced the water quality.
Downloads
References
ABREU, P. C.; ODEBRECHT, C.; NIENCHESKI, L.F. Nutrientes Dissolvidos. In: SEELINGER, C.; ODEBRECHT, C. (Orgs). O estuário da lagoa dos Patos: um século de transformações. Rio Grande do Sul: FURG, Cap. 4, 2010. p. 43-51.
APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, 23rd ed., Washington, DC, 2017.
BRASIL, Resolução CONAMA n°357, de 17 de março de 2005. Classificação de águas, doces, salobras e salinas do Território Nacional. Publicado no D.O.U.
BEAUMORD, A.C.; SILVEIRA NETO, D.V.; MONTIBELLER, P. 2003. Monitoramento da qualidade da água do rio Itajaí-Mirim, no município de Itajaí, SC. In: II Simpósio Brasileiro de Engenharia Ambiental – UNIVALI, Itajaí. Resumos, p. 538, ref. 1164.
CARMO, M.S.; BOAVENTURA, G. R.; OLIVEIRA, E.C. Geoquímica das Águas da Bacia do Rio Descoberto. In: Química Nova, 28 (4): 565-574. 2005.
DI BERNARDO, L.; DANTAS, A. D. B. Métodos e técnicas de tratamento de água. São Carlos: RiMa. 2005.
GAPLAN. Atlas de Santa Catarina. Rio de Janeiro: Aero foto Cruzeiro. 1986.
HOMECHIN JR, M.; BEAUMORD, A.C. Caracterização da qualidade das águas do trecho médio do rio Itajaí-mirim, Santa Catarina. In: VIII Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil. Anais. 2007. Caxambu. MG.
PEREIRA FILHO, J.; SPILLERE, L. C.; SCHETTINI, A. C. Itajaí-açu river estuary (Santa Catarina, Brazil): Preliminary Budget for dissolved inorganic nutrientes. Journal of coastal Research, p. 702-206, 2006.
PEREIRA FILHO, et al. Spatial changes in the water quality of Itajaí-açu fluvial-stuarine system, Santa Catarina. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, v.82, n.4, p. 963-982, 2010.
POUDEL D.D., LEE T., SRINIVASAN R., ABBASPOUR K., JEONG C.Y. Assessment of seasonal and spatial variation of surface water quality, identification of factors associated with water quality variability, and the modeling of critical nonpoint source pollution areas in an agricultural watershed. Journal Soil and Water Conservation Society, 68 (3): 155-171. 2013.
RIFFEL, E. & BEAUMORD, A.C. Identificação das atividades potencialmente poluidoras do rio Itajaí-Mirim e seus tributários no Município de Brusque, S.C. In: I Simpósio Brasileiro de Engenharia Ambiental. Resumos. 2002. Itajaí, SC.
WHITFIELD, J. Vital Signs. Nature, 411 (28): 989-990. 2001.
ZHANG Z., CHEN Y., WAMG P., SHUAI J., TAO F., SHI P. River discharge, land use change, and surface water quality inthe Xiangjiang River. Hydrological Processes, 28 (13): 4130-4140. 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.