Evaluation of antimicrobial use in the basic health units of Ponte Nova / MG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X43575Keywords:
Antimicrobial, Bacterial resistance, Primary health careAbstract
Antimicrobials are prescribed drugs in large quantity in Primary Care. The use of these has been highlighted in the policies to rationalize the use of medicines, for being more consumed and because these are drugs most wrongly and abusively used. The study das as an objective to evaluate the process of antibacterial therapy in primary health care of Ponte Nova/MG, identifying the classes of most used antimicrobials, the main bacterial infections, comparing them to the indications to antibacterial therapy protocols. Field research was carried out in the Basic Health Units and in the Pharmacy of Minas, based on interviews guided by a survey, structured in a database with all the information collected through the program Epiinfo 7.2.1.0. Amoxicillin was the antimicrobial that appeared the most in the prescriptions, followed by cephalexin, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin. Among the most identified infections are the urinary tract and upper respiratory tract. Brazil and the European countries presented the same antimicrobial consumption pattern. The study illustrated the major problem currently presented, the considered increased risk of bacterial resistance, as it confirmed the abusive use of antimicrobials to treat infections.
Downloads
References
ANTONIO NS, OLIVEIRA AC, CANESINI R, ROCHA JR, PEREIRA, REP. Mecanismos de resistência bacteriana. Rev. Cient. Eletr. de Medicina Veterinária [Internet], jan. 2009 [cited 2018 mar 12]; ano VII (12): 1-4. Available from: http://faef.revista.inf.br/imagens_arquivos/arquivos_destaque/UuBDHbHjev9rGKV_2013-6-21-11-52-49.pdf
BAPTISTA MGFM. Mecanismo de resistência aos antibióticos. [dissertation]. Lisboa: Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologia; 2013. 42 p. [cited 2018 abr26 ]. Available from: http://recil.grupolusofona.pt/bitstream/handle/10437/3264/Mecanismos%20de%20Resist%C3%AAncia%20aos%20Antibi%C3%B3ticos%20%20Maria%20Galv%C3%A3o%20Ba.pdf?sequence=1.
BRAOIOS A, PEREIRA ACS, BIZERRA AA, POLICARPO OF, SOARES NC, BARBOSA AS. Uso de antimicrobianos pela população da cidade de Jataí (GO), Brasil.Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet], out. 2013 [cited 2018 abr. 28];18(10):3055 60. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232013001000030&lng=en.
CAMARGO ECG, KIFFER CRV, PIGNATARI ACC, SHIMAKURA SE, RIBEIRO JR PJ, MONTEIRO AMV. Proposta sobre uso de dados de receitas de antimicrobianos retidas: a experiência EUREQA.Cad. Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2012 maio [cited 2018 abr 18];28(5):985 90. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102311X2012000500017&lng=en&nrm=iso.
COSTA ALP, SILVA JUNIOR ACS. Resistência bacteriana aos antibióticos e saúde pública: uma breve revisão de literatura. Estação Científica [Internet], mai/ago. 2017 [cited 2019 mai 01];7(2):45-57. Availablefrom: https://periodicos.unifap.br/index.php/estacao/article/view/2555.
DEL FIOL FS, LOPES LC, TOLEDO MI, BARBERATO-FILHO S. Perfil de prescrições e uso de antibióticos em infecções comunitárias.Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Tro. [Internet], fev. 2010 [cited 2018 mar 24];43(1):68-72. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S003786822010000100015&lng=en&nrm=iso.
FERREIRA VM, ROSSITER LNV, ARAGÃO NFF, PINTO OA, SANTOS, PM, CARDOSO, PHA, et al. Infecções comunitárias do trato urinário em Divinópolis, MG: avaliação do perfil de resistência bacteriana e do manejo clínico. Rev. bras. med. fam. comunidade. 2017;12(39):1-13.
GUEDES RAC, ÁLVARES ACM. O uso racional de antimicrobianos como prevenção da resistência bacteriana. [online], 2014 [cited 2018 mar 03]. Senaaires [Internet]. Available from: http://www.senaaires.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/o-uso-racional-de-antimicrobianos-como-preven%c3%87%c3%83o-da-resist%c3%8ancia-bacteriana.pdf.
HOOTON TM, KALPANA G. Acute uncomplicated cystitis in women. 2018 [cited 2018 maio 22]. In: UpToDate [Internet]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/acute-simple-cystitis-in-women
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério do Planejamento,Orçamento e Gestão (BR) [cited 2018 mar 03]. Cidades 2010.Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/ponte-nova/panorama
LIMA CC, BENJAMIM SCC, SANTOS RFS. Mecanismo de resistência bacteriana frente aos fármacos: uma revisão. CuidArte, Enferm [Internet].jan-jun2017 [cited 2019 mar12];11(1):105 13. Available from: http://www.webfipa.net/facfipa/ner/sumarios/cuidarte/2017v1/15%20Artigo_Mecanismo%20resist%C3%AAncia%20bacteriana%20a%20antibi%C3%B3ticos_27-07-17.pdf
LOUREIRO RJ, ROQUE F, RODRIGUES AT, HERDEIRO MT, RAMALHEIRA E. O uso de antibióticos e as resistências bacterianas: breves notas sobre a evolução. Rev. port. saúde pública [Internet], mar. 2016 [cited2018 mai. 22];34(1):77–84. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S087090251500067X
MARTINS NB, SOUSA LMG, TORRES MLD, ARAUJO-FIRMO WC. Análise de prescrição médica de antibióticos de uma farmácia comercial do município de Imperatriz – MA. Rev. Científica do ITPAC [Internet]. out. 2014 [cited 2018 abr 26];7(4):1-9. Available from: https://assets.itpac.br/arquivos/revista/74/artigo10.pdf.
MOTA LM, VILAR FC, DIAS LBA, NUNES TF, MORIGUTI JC. Uso racional de antimicrobianos. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto Online) [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 mar 03];43(2):164 72. Available from: http://revista.fmrp.usp.br/2010/vol43n2/Simp8_Uso%20racional%20de%20antimicrobianos.pdf.
NICOLINI P, NASCIMENTO JWL, GRECO KV, MENEZES FG. Fatores relacionados à prescrição médica de antibióticos em farmácia pública da região Oeste da cidade de São Paulo. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet], abr. 2008 [cited 2018 maio 22]13(suppl):689 96. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S141381232008000700018&lng=en&nrm=iso.
OLIVEIRA AC, SILVA RS. Desafios do cuidar em saúde frente à resistência bacteriana: uma revisão. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2019 mar 12];10(1):189-97. Availablefrom: http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v10/n1/v10n1a17.htm
RAMALHINHO I,GOMES LF, FILIPE C, CAVACO A, CABRITA J. Padrão de prescrição de antibióticos no Algarve: características do doente e dispersão da terapêutica. Rev. port. saúde pública [Internet], abr. 2015 [cited 2018 maio 22]; 33(2):207 21. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870902515000383.
SIH TM, BRICKS LF. Otimizando o diagnóstico para o tratamento adequado das principais infecções agudas em otorrinopediatria: tonsilite, sinusite e otite média. Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol. [Internet]. 2008 out. [cited 2018 mar 24];74(5):755-62. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72992008000500018&lng=en.
TAVARES NUL, BERTOLDI AD, MUCCILLO-BAISCH AL. Prescrição de antimicrobianos em unidades de saúde da família no Sul do Brasil.Cad. de Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2008 ago [cited 2018 mar 12];24(8):1791-1800. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2008000800008&lng=en.
TAVARES W, MARINHO LAC.Rotinas de Diagnóstico e Tratamento das Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias. 4 ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2015.
TAVARES W. Antibióticos e quimioterápicos para clínico. 3 st ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2014.
ZIMERMAN RA. Uso indiscriminado de antimicrobianos e resistência microbiana. In: Uso racional de medicamentos: Temas selecionados. Ministério da saúde, boletim nº 3 Brasília:Editora MS 2010 [cited 2018 maio 22]:1-12. Available from: https://www.paho.org/bra/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=1348-uso-indiscriminado-antimicrobianos-e-resistencia-microbiana-boletim-n-03-8&category_slug=uso-racional-medicamentos-685&Itemid
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-06 (2)
- 2021-05-18 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
