Urban arborization management plan: tool design for efficiency and public safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41526Keywords:
Urban arborization, Criteria, ConflictsAbstract
The inventory of the urban arborization of Positivo University parking lots in Ecoville Campus was conducted through census criteria, concerning the surroundings conflicts related to tree health, origin and phenology, that were scored and weighted. There were 393 individuals, 12 species and five families where 60% were native to Brazil. The main canopy criteria was the reaching branches on the access road in a proportion of 40%; in the trunk analysis, it was observed lesion (45%) and rot (40%); at the base’s analysis it was verified injury (43%) and root damage (35%) and exposed root (25%). The presence of fruit (26%) was higher than the flowering. Handroanthus albus presented the best result for the criteria, unlike Anadenanthera macrocarpa and Tipuana tipu. The trees showed a landscaping potential, however, the space available for the large size ones was not adequate and the large size species intensified the conflicts, when there was no planning. The species characteristics should be observed, in relation to the three-dimensional space availability. Thus, future conflicts that can be avoided endanger tree health, urban infrastructure and residents which can lead to economic losses. For this reason, the elaboration of the Municipal Urban Arborization Plan is considered primordial.
Downloads
References
ANGISOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP III. An update of the Angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the ordens and families of flowering plants: APG III. Annals of the Botanical J. Lin. Soc. 2009. 161:105 - 121.
ABREU LV, LABAKI LC. Conforto térmico propiciado por algumas espécies arbóreas: avaliação do raio de influência através de diferentes índices de conforto. Ambient. Constr. 2010;10(4):103-117.
ARAUJO MN, ARAUJO AJ. Arborização urbana. O Paraná em Debate: Agenda Parlamentar Crea – PR. Série de Cad. Téc. Ag. Parl.. 2016:43.
BRASIL. LEI N° 10.257/01- Regulamenta os arts. 182 e 183 da Constituição Federal, estabelece diretrizes gerais da política urbana e dá outras providências.
BRASIL. LEI N° 9.605/98 - Dispõe sobre as sanções penais e administrativas derivadas de condutas e atividades lesivas ao meio ambiente, e dá outras providências.
BRIANEZI D, JACOVINE LAG, GONÇALVES W, ROCHA SJSS. Avaliação da Arborização no Campus-Sede da Universidade Federal De Viçosa. 2013. REVSBAU. 8(4): 89-106.
BROKAW NVL. Treefalls, regrowth, and community strutcture in Tropical Forests. In: PICKETT STA; WHITE PS (Ed.). The Ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. New York: Academic Press. 1985.
BRUN FGK, SOLON JL, BRUN EJ, FREITAG AS, SCHUMACHER MV. Comportamento fenológico e efeito da poda em algumas espécies empregadas na arborização do bairro Camobi – Santa Maria, RS. RVSBAU. 2007.2(1):44-63.
CARVALHO, P. E. R. 2003. Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. v.1. Colombo: EMBRAPA. 1.039p
CASTRO ASF, MORO MF, ROCHA FCL. Plantas dos espaços livres da Reitoria da Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR), Ceará, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Biocienc. 2011.9(1):126-129.
CONWAY TM, VANDERVECHT J. Growing adiverse urban forest: species election decisions by practitioners planting and supplying trees. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015.138:1–10.
COWETT F D, BASSUK N. Street Tree Diversity in Three Northeastern U.S. States. Arboric. Urb. For. 2017.43(1):1–14.
CUPERTINO MA, EISENLOHR PV. Análise florística comparativa da arborização urbana nos campi universitários do Brasil. Biosci. J. 2013. 29(3):739-750.
DANTAS IC, CHAVES TP, FELISMINO-FERREIRA VMG. Arborização dos bairros Alto Branco, Lauritzen, Campina Grande / PB: Estudo comparativo. 2011. REVSBAU. 6(2):76-89.
DRISCOLL AN, RIES, PD, TILT JH, GANIO LM. Needs and barriers to expanding urban forestry programs: Anassessmento community official sand program managers in the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan region. Urb. For. Urb. Gr. 2015.14:48-55.
CARDIM, R. Política do verde urbano: entrevista para site de direito ambiental. Rev. Obs. Eco. Chicago climate action plan: Our city, our future. 2011.
COMPANHIA ENERGÉTICA DE MINAS GERAIS (CEMIG). Manual de Arborização. Belo Horizonte: Cemig e Fundação Biodiversitas. 2011. 112p.
CHUN B, GULDMANN JM. Impact of greening on the urban heat island: Seasonal variations and mitigation strategies. Comp. Env. Urb. Sys. 2018. 71:165-176.
CUPERTINO MA, EISENLOHR PV. Análise florística comparativa da arborização urbana nos campi universitários do Bras. Biosc. J. 2013. 29(3):739-750.
EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION). Green infrastructure (GI) - enhancing Europe's natural capital. European Commission. 249 final. 2013.
EC (EUROPEAN COMMISSION). Nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final report of the horizon 2020 expert group on ‘Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities’ (full version). European Commission. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 2015.
FALEIRO, W, AMÂNCIO-PEREIRA, F. Arborização Viária do Campus Umuarama da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, MG. Rev. Cient. Eletr. Eng. Flor. 2007. VI (10)
GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E, BARTON DN. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 2013. 86:235-245.
GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E, GREN A, BARTON D, LANGEMEYER J, MCPHEARSON T, O’FARRELL P, ANDERSSON E, HAMSTEAD Z; KREMER P. Urban ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht. 2013:175-251.
GUILHERME FAG; SILVA MC; CARNEIRO DNM; NASCIMENTO HCA; RESSEL K; FERREIRA WC. Urban arborization in public pathways of four cities in east Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) Brazil. Ornam. Hortic. 2018. 24(2):174-181
HAASE D, LARONDELLE N, ANDERSSON E, ARTMANN M, BORGSTRÖM S, BREUSTE J, GOMEZ-BAGGETHUN E, GREN Å, HAMSTEAD Z, HANSEN R, KABISCH N, KREMER P, LANGEMEYER J, RALL E, MCPHEARSON T, PAULEIT S, QURESHI S, SCHWARZ N, VOIGT A, WURSTER D, ELMQVIST T. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio. 2014. 43:413-433
HU R, BOURNEZ E, CHENG S, JIANG H, NERRY F, LANDES T, SAUDREAU M, KASTENDEUCH P, NAJJAR G, COLIN J, YAN G. Estimating the leaf area of an individual tree in urban areas using terrestrial laser scanner and path length distribution model. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2018. 144:357-368.
HUANG Q, HUANG J, YANG X, FANG C, LIANG Y. Quantifying the seasonal contribution of coupling urban land use types on Urban Heat Island using Land Contribution Index: A case study in Wuhan, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019. 44:666-675.
IBGE. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira. Série Manuais Técnicos em Geociências. nº 1. Rio de Janeiro. 2012.
INMET. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METEOROLOGIA. Banco de dados meteorológicos para ensino e pesquisa. 2012.
INSTITUTO AMBIENTAL DO PARANÁ. Portaria Nº 059/15 - Reconhece a Lista Oficial de Espécies Exóticas Invasoras para o Estado do Paraná, estabelece normas de controle e dá outras providências.
KARDEL F, WUYTS K, BABANEZHAD M, VITHARANA UWA, WUYTACK T, POTTERS G, SAMSON R. Assessing urban habitat quality based on specific leaf area and stomatal characteristics of Plantago lanceolata L. Environ. Poll. 2010. 158: 788-794.
KRONENBERG J. Why not to green a city? institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 2015. 12:218-227.
LIMA RMC, JÚNIOR MCS. Inventário da arborização urbana implantada na década de 60 no Plano Piloto, Brasília, DF. REVSBAU. 2010. 5(4):110-127.
LOCASTRO JK, MIOTTO JL, ANGELIS BLD, CAXAMBU MG. Avaliação do uso sustentável da arborização urbana no município de Cafeara, Paraná. Ciência Florestal. 2017. 27(2):549-556.
LORENZI H; SOUZA HM; TORRES MAV; BACHER LB. Árvores Exóticas no Brasil: madeireiras, ornamentais e aromáticas. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum, 2003. 385p
LORENZI, H. Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. 5.ed. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum, 2008. v.1. 368p.
MAACK, R. Geografia Física do Estado do Paraná. 4. ED. UFPG. 2012.
MARCHIORI, JNC. Elementos de Dendrologia. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; 2004. 163p.
MEUNIER, I. Como começar a arborizar as pessoas. Rev. Cont. On-line. 2013. 1(152):1-3.
MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO DO ESTADO DO PARANÁ (MPEP). Manual para elaboração do Plano Municipal de Arborização Urbana. 2ª Edição. Curitiba: Ministério Público do Estado do Paraná – PR, 2018
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN. Vascular Tropicos (VAST) nomenclatural database and associated authority files. 1968.. Disponível em: http://www.mobot.org/w3t/search/vast.html. Acesso em: 24/8/2019.
MONHOTO ES, MONTEIRO EA, FISCH STV. Arborização viária na cidade de Taubaté, SP: no centro comercial histórico e um bairro residencial moderno. REVSBAU. 2009. 4(2): 82-96.
NICODEMO MLF, PRIMAVESI O. Por que manter árvores na área urbana? São Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2009.
PAGLIARI, S. C., DORIGON, E. B. Arborização urbana: importância das espécies adequadas. arborização urbana: importância das espécies adequadas. Unoesc & Cienc. – ACET. 2013. 4(2):139-148.
POUEY MT, FREITAS R, SATTLER M. Arborização e sustentabilidade. Curitiba: Encac-Cotedi, 2003.
PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE CURITIBA. Lei 9806/00 - Institui o Código Florestal de Curitiba.
REHMAN S; PARK I. Effect of scarification, GA and chilling on the germination of goldenrain-tree (Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.) seeds. Sci. Hort. 2000. 85:319-324.
REVI A, SATTERTHWAITE DE, ARAGÓN-DURAND F, CORFEE-MORLOT J, KIUNSI RBR, PELLING M, ROBERTS DC, SOLECKI W. Urban áreas. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, KISSEL ES, LEVY AN, MACCRACKEN S, MASTRANDREA PR, WHITE LL, editors. Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York; 2014. p..535–612.
RODERJAN, C. V.; BARDDAL, M.L. Arborização de ruas de Curitiba-PR – Guia prático para a identificação das espécies. Curitiba: FUPEF, 1998.
SANCHÉZ, M. Koelreuteria paniculata jabonero de la china. Disponível em: http://www.rjb.csic.es/jardinbotanico/ficheros/documentos/pdf/pubinv/msg/koelreuteria_paniculata.pdf. Acesso: 19/10/2019.
SANTAMOUR JR F S. Trees for urban planting:diversity uniformity, and common sense. En C. Ele-vitch, The Overstory Book: Cultivating connections with trees (pp. 396-399). Holualoa, Hawaii: Per-manent Agriculture Resources. 2004.
SANTOS, FC, CASTRO PM, CAMARGO JA. Avaliação da Sanidade das Árvores do bairro Roosevelt em Uberlândia-MG – Uma Ferramenta para Diagnosticar e Reduzir os Riscos no Fornecimento de Energia Elétrica. In: XIX Seminário Nacional de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica- SENDI; 2010; São Paulo, Brasil.
SANTOS NRZ, TEIXEIRA IF. Arborização de vias públicas: ambiente x vegetação. Porto Alegre: Instituto Souza Cruz; 2001.
SILVA LM. Reflexões sobre a identidade arbórea das cidades. REVSBAU. 2008. 3(3): 65-71.
SILVA AG, GONÇALVES W, LEITE HG, SANTOS E. Comparação de três métodos de obtenção de dados para avaliação quali-quantitativa da arborização viária, em Belo Horizonte - MG. REVSBAU. 2006. 1(1): 31-44.
SOARES J, PELIZZARO L. Inventário da Arborização Urbana do município de Ampére (Paraná – Brasil). Rev. Bras. MA. 2019. 5(1): 111-127.
STOBBART M, JOHNSTON M. A survey of urban tree management in New Zealand. 2012. Arboric Urb. For. 38:247–254.
SWAINE MD; WHITMORE TC. On the definition of ecological species groups in tropical rain forests. Netherlands: Kluwer. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. Veg. 1998. (75): 81-86.
TEIXEIRA IF. Análise qualitativa da arborização de ruas do Conjunto habitacional Tancredo Neves, Santa Maria, RS. Cienc. Flor., 1999. 9(2): 9-21.
VAN DER JAGT APN, LAWRENCE A. Local government and urban forest governance: insights from Scotland. Scandinavian J. For. Res. 2019. 34(1): 53–66.
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-21 (2)
- 2020-03-04 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
