Thermal risk for common beans due to high temperatures in three counties of Rio Grande do Sul state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40430Keywords:
Abscission, Phaseolus vulgaris L., Ethylene Synthesis.Abstract
Common beans are an important protein source for human diet. Much cultivated in small farms it is considered a subsistence crop, employing little cultivation technology. It presents a high susceptibility to temperatures above 28 °C in reproductive periods, causing abortion of plant parts due to the high temperature triggering the plant ethylene synthesis. The agroclimatic zoning for culture does not emphasis on air temperature, which affects the crop. With these assumptions, the aim of this work was to evaluate the high temperature thermal risk for the bean crop in Cruz Alta, Passo Fundo and São Luiz Gonzaga. From the maximum air temperature data obtained since 1961, we obtained the average frequency of days at which the maximum air temperature was equal or greater than 28 °C in ten-day periods. The bigger thermal risk was found in the third ten-day period of January and in the last ten-day period of December. Passo Fundo showed the better thermal conditions for bean crop. São Luiz Gonzaga, even during periods not indicated for the culture, during winter, still showed happen at least one day of thermal risk.
Downloads
References
GERAUD G, SPIERINGS EL, KEYWOOD C. Tolerability and safety of frovatriptan with short- and long-term use for treatment of migraine and in comparison with sumatriptan. Headache. 2002;42 Suppl 2:S93-9.
ALVARES CA, STAPE JL, SENTELHAS PC, GONÇALVES JLM, SPAROVEK G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2014;22(6):711-728.
BARBANO MT. Risco Climático e épocas de semeadura para o feijoeiro (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Carioca) na safra das águas no estado de São Paulo. Campinas [dissertation]. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico/IAC; 2003. 74 p.
BINDER BM and PATTERSON SE. Ethylene-dependent and -independent regulation of abscission. Stewart Postharvest Review. 2009;5(1):1-10.
CAMPO JHC, SILVA MT, SILVA VPR. Impacto do aquecimento global no cultivo do feijão-caupi, no estado da Paraíba. Ver. bras. Eng. agríc ambient. 2010;14(4):396-404.
CARGNELUTTI FILHO A, MALUF JRT, RIBEIRO ND, TRINDADE JK, SAWASATO JT, STOLZ AP. Temperatura máximas prejudiciais ao feijoeiro no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Ciênc. Rural. 2005;35(5):1019-1026.
CARVALHO JJ, SAAD JCC, BASTOS AVS, NAVES SS, SOARES FAL, VIDAL VM. Teor e acúmulo de nutrientes em grãos de feijão comum em semeadura direta, sob déficit hídrico. Irriga. 2014;1:104-117.
CRUZ CD. GENES - a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci. Agron. 2013;35(3):271-276.
DINIZ GB, BERLATO MA, CLARKE RT, FONTANA DC. Identification of homogeneos regions of maximum and minimum temperatures of the Rio Grande do Sul. Rev. Bras. Agrometeorologia. 2003;11(2):303-312.
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA. Feijão: o produtor pergunta, a Embrapa responde. Brasília (Brasil): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2003. 203p.
MADURAIMUTHU M. and PRASAD PVV. Ethylene production under high temperature stress causes premature leaf senescence in soybean. Funct. Plant Biology. 2010;37(11):1071-1084.
FIELD RJ. A relationship between membrane permeability and ethylene production at higt temperature in leaf tissue of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Ann. Bot. 1981;48(1):33-39.
HOFFMANN JÚNIOR L. Substratos para cultivo de feijão e tolerância a alta temperatura do ar no período reprodutivo. Santa Maria [dissertation]. Santa Maria: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agrononia/UFSM. 2006. 45 f.
HOFFMANN JÚNIOR L, RIBEIRO ND, ROSA SS, JOST E, POERSCH NL, MEDEIROS SLP. Resposta de cultivares de feijão à alta temperatura do ar no período reprodutivo. Ciênc. Rural. 2007;37(6):1543-1548.
KAUSHAL N, BHANDARI K, SIDDIQUE KHM, NAYYAR H. Food crops face rising temperatures: an overview of responses, adaptive mechanisms, and approaches to improve heat tolerance. Cogent Food Agric. 2016;2(1):1134380.
LARKINDALE J and HUANG B. Thermotolerance and antioxidant systems in Agrostis stolonifera: involvement of salicylic acid, abscisic acid, calcium, hydrogen peroxide, and ethylene. J. Plant Physiol. 2004;161(4):405-413.
LARKINDALE J, HALL JD, KNIGHT MR, VIERLING E. Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 2005;138(2):882-897.
MACHADO JP, BLANK DMP, ZONTA JH, JUSTINO FB Comportamento da precipitação e da temperatura no Rio Grande do Sul beseado na análise de agrupamento. CeN. 2010;32(1):49-63.
MALUF JRT, CUNHA GR, MATZENAUER R, PASINATO A, PIMENTEL MBM, CAIAFF MR. Zoneamento de risco climático para a cultura de feijão no Rio Grande do Sul. Rev. Bras. Agrometeorologia. 2001;9(3):468-476.
MAPA-MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO. Secretaria de políticas agrícola. (Ato portaria n° 105, de 2 de ago 2017).
MASSIGNAM AM, VIEIRA HJ, HEMP S, FLESCH RD. Ecofisiologia do feijoeiro. II–Redução do rendimento pela ocorrência de altas temperaturas no florescimento. Rev. Bras. Agrometeorologia. 1998;6(1):41-45.
RADIN B, MATZENAUER R. Uso das informações meteorológicas na agricultura do Rio Grande do Sul. Agrometeoros. 2016;24(1):41-54.
ROCHA PRR, ARAÚJO GAA, CARNEIRO JES, CECON PR, LIMA TC. Adubação molíbdica na cultura do feijão nos sistemas de plantio direto e convencional. R. Caatinga. 2011; 24(2):9-17.
SILVA JC. Épocas de menor risco de estresse hídrico e térmico para o feijoeiro na região central do rio grande do sul. Santa Maria [dissertation]. Santa Maria: Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia/UFSM; 2005. 46 p.
TAIZ L and ZEIGER E. Etileno. In: Fisiologia vegetal. ed. Artmed, 2013; p. 541-560.
ZUCARELI C, PRANDO AM, RAMOS JUNIOR EU, NAKAGAWA J. Fósforo na produtividade e qualidade de sementes de feijão carioca precoce cultivado no período das águas. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 2011; 42(1):32-38.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.