Desenvolvimento do Índice de Perigo de Incêndio (IPI) a partir de dados meteorológicos e imagens MODIS para a prevenção e combate a incêndios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X37624Keywords:
sensoriamento remoto, processamento de imagens, monitoramento de incêndios.Abstract
O conhecimento da propagação de incêndios é imprescindível para o monitoramento ambiental em função de auxiliar na determinação das áreas suscetíveis as ocorrências e permitir o estabelecimento de métodos de prevenção e combate. O objetivo deste trabalho foi desenvolver uma metodologia para determinação de um Índice de Perigo de Incêndio (IPI). Para análise da eficiência deste índice, utilizou-se como área de estudo a região compreendida entre os estados do Pará, Maranhão, Tocantins e Goiás. A metodologia foi desenvolvida a partir do uso de dados como relevo e uso do solo, que são relativamente estáticos, e também de dados dinâmicos, como o índice de vegetação (NDVI) derivado de imagens do sensor orbital MODIS, bem como dados meteorológicos calculados e interpolados diariamente por meio do inverso do quadrado das distâncias (IQD). Os resultados mostraram-se efetivos, trazendo um bom panorama das condições para a perigo e propagação de incêndios, sendo possível replicar tal índice para outros biomas e áreas de interesse.
Downloads
References
BATISTA, A. C. "Mapas de risco: uma alternativa para o planejamento de controle de incêndios florestais." Floresta. v. 30, n. ½, 2000.
DEPPE, F.; VEDOR de PAULA, E.; MENEGHETTE, C. R.; VOSGERAU, J. Comparação de índice de risco de incêndio florestal com focos de calor no Estado do Paraná. Revista Floresta. v.34, p-119-126, 2004.
ESCUIN, S.; NAVARRO, R.; FERNANDEZ, P. Fire severity assessment by using NBR (normalized burn ratio) and NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) derived from Landsat TM/ETM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing. v.29, p.1053-1073, 2008.
ESKANDARI, S., GHADIKOLAEI, J. O., JALILVAND, H., & SARADJIAN, M. R. Prediction of Future Forest Fires Using the MCDM Method. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(5), 2015.
GIGLIO, L.; DESCLOITRES, J.; JUSTICE, C. O.; KAUFMAN, Y. An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sensing Environment. v.87, p.273-282, 2003.
GIGLIO, L.; Schroeder, W.; Justice, C. O. The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sensing Environment. v.178, p.31-41, 2016.
JUSTINO, F. B., Souza, S. S., & Setzer, A. A relação entre focos de calor e condições meteorológicas no Brasil. In: Anais do XII Congresso Brasileiro de Meteorologia. p. 1-15, 2002.
LEON, J. R. R.; van Leeuwen, W.J.D.; Casady, G.M. Using MODIS-NDVI-for the modeling of post-wildfire vegetation response as a function of environmental conditions and pre-fire restoration treatmensts. Remote Sensing. v.4, p.598-621, 2012.
LI, X.; SONG, W; LIAN, L.; WEI, X. Forest fire smoke detection using back-propagation neural network based on MODIS data. Remote Sensing. v.7, p.447-4498, 2015.
PIVELLO, V. The use of fire in the Cerrado and Amazonian Rainforests of Brazil: past and present. Fire Ecology, v.7, n.1, p. 25-39, 2011.
MORISSETTE, J. T.; GIGLIO, L.; CSISZAR, I.; SETZER, A.; SCHROEDER, W.; MORTON, D.; JUSTICE, C.O. Validation of MODIS active fire detection products derived from two algorithms. Earth Interactions, v.2005, p.09-0009, 2005.
PEREIRA, G. H. A.; LOHMANN M.; DEPPE, F. Monitoramento de incêndios utilizando imagens Landsat 8: Um estudo de caso para o estado do Tocantins. Anais…XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto - SBSR. Santos. INPE, p. 2700-2707, 2017.
SCHROEDER, W.; A.; OLIVIA, P.; CSIZAR, I. S. The new VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sensing Environment. v.143, p.85-96, 2014.
SILVEIRA, H. L. F.; VETTORAZZI, C. A.; VALENTE, R. O. A. Avaliação multicriterial no mapeamento de risco de incêndios florestais, em ambiente sig, na bacia do Rio Corumbataí, SP. Revista Árvore. v.32, p. 259-268, 2008.
SHARPLES, J.J., R.H.D. McRAE, R.O. WEBER, and A.M. GILL, A simple index for assessing fuel moisture content. Environmental Modelling and Software, v.24, p.637-646. 2009.
SILVA, J, C.; FIEDLER, N, C.; SILVA, F, G. Uso da formula de Monte Alegre na determinação de períodos críticos de ocorrência de incêndios florestais na área de proteção ambiental do Gama Cabeça-de-Viado, Brasília-DF. Brasil Florestal, n.72, p. 29-36, 2001.
SOARES, R.V. Índices de perigo de incêndio. Revista Floresta, v.3, n.3, 1972. p.19-40.
SOARES, R. V. Incêndios florestais: controle e uso do fogo. Curitiba: FUPEF, 1985. 213 p.
VERHEGGHEN, A.; EVA, H.; CECCHERINI, G.; ACHARD, F.; GOND, V.; GOULERT-FREURY, S.; CERUTTI, P, O. The potencial of Sentinel for burnt area mapping and monitoring in the Congo Basin Forests. Remote Sensing, v.8, p.1-22, 2016.
WANG, W. T.; QU, J. J; HAO, X. J.; LIU, Y.Q.; SOMMERS, W.T. An Improved algorithm for small and cool fire detection using modis data: A preliminary study in the southeastern United States. Remote Sensing Environment. v.108, p.163-170, 2007.
WOOSTER, M. J.; ROBERTS, G.; PERRY, G. L W. Retrieval of biomass combustion rates and total from fire radiative power observations: FRP derivation and calibration relationships between biomass consumption and fire radiative energy release. Geophysical Research. v.110, p.1-24, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
