Project of didactic workbenches for laboratory of electrical installations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35498Keywords:
Didactic workbenches, Electrical installations, Practical learningAbstract
The high cost of assembling laboratories for higher education is a challenge when there is a contingency of resources. An alternative to overcome the high cost in the development of the basic structures of the teaching laboratories, is the designing and implementation of laboratory workbenches, built with the help of teachers, technicians and university students. In this work will be approached the project of didactic workbenches for the laboratory of electrical installations, capable of attending the most varied menus, as well as courses such as Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism, among others. Analyzing from a financial point of view, there is an economy above 90%, compared to commercial didactic workbenches in market. In addition, taking into account the teaching-learning aspect of the students, the benefits are greater, since the very design, design and construction of the benches represent an important form of practical learning. In addition, the workbench aims to increase the degree of complexity of the tasks compared to the existing equipment in the market, since it encompasses more concepts. For the acquisition of materials, it is suggested the use of institutional resources or partnership with public and private companies.
Downloads
References
CERVANTES, S.G.S. Bancadas Didáticas para Sistemas de Automação Pneumática. COBENGE: Congresso Brasileiro de Educação em Engenharia, 2008. São Paulo (Brasil).
FIGUEIREDO, M. R. Construção e Validação de uma Bancada Didática de Impulso Hidrostático. COBENGE: Congresso Brasileiro de Educação em Engenharia, 2014. Juiz de Fora (Brasil).
MINISTÉRIO DO TRABALHO; Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. Portaria N° 326/18 – Norma Regulamentadora de Segurança do trabalho em máquinas e equipamentos. Brasília (Brasil): Ministério do Trabalho; 2018.
MINISTÉRIO DO TRABALHO; Ministério do Trabalho e Previdência Social. Portaria N° 508/16 – Norma Regulamentadora de Segurança em instalações e serviços em eletricidade. Brasília (Brasil): Ministério do Trabalho; 2016.
PANDINI M.M., SPACEK A.D., NETO J. M., JUNIOR, O. H. A. Design of a Didatic Workbench of Industrial Automation Systems for Engineering Education. IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 15, nº. 8, pp. 1384-1391, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
