Agroclimatic zoning for rice planting in the central mesoregion of the Maranhão State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X29556Keywords:
Climatic risk zoning, Water balance, AgrometeorologyAbstract
The aim of this study is to accomplish a climatic risk zoning to define the best season to planting rice in the central region of Maranhão State. There were used data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics; Historical series of precipitation and temperature obtained from the National Water Agency and National Institute of Meteorology. The agroclimatic risk zoning was accomplished using the SARRAZON program. The climatic risk for sowing rice was defined as follows: ISNA> 0.65 - Low climatic risk, favorable region to the planting; 0.55 <ISNA <0.65 - intermediate region; ISNA <0.55 - High climatic risk, unfavorable region. For the R7 Region in soils with CAD 30 mm, the period ranges from the first ten-day of December to the first ten-day of February. And for soils with CAD 40mm, the better planting season is from the third ten-day of November to the third ten-day of February. For the R9 homogeneous region in soils with CAD of 20 and 30 mm, the results showed since the third ten-day of November to the second ten-day of January. For soils with CAD 40 mm, the rice sowing ranges from the third ten-day of November to the third ten-day of January.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE JÚNIOR AS, BASTOS EA. Precipitação pluviométrica provável em municípios do Cerrado Piauiense. Teresina: Embrapa-CPAMN, 1997. 22p.
ARAÚJO AES. Caracterização e uso de bactérias diazotróficas isoladas de diferentes cultivares de arroz originárias do estado do Maranhão. [Thesis]. Rio de Janeiro: UFRRJ; 2008. 99f.
ASSAD ED, EVANGELISTA BA, SANS LMA, FARIAS JR, SILVA SC. Zoneamento agroclimático para grãos na região do Meio-Norte Brasileiro. In: Simpósio Sobre Os Cerrados Do Meio-Norte. 1997. v. 1. pp. 20-38.
BARON C, PEREZ P, MARAUX F. Sarrazon - Bilan hidrique applique au zonage. Montpellier: Cirad.1996; 26p.
CARVALHO AL. Estação de cultivo baseada na precipitação pluvial diária e na ocorrência de períodos secos para a região de Rio Largo, Alagoas. [Dissertation]. Maceió: UFAL; 2010. 76f.
COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO (CONAB). [Internet], Brasília. Quarto levantamento. 2016. Disponível em: http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/ 16_01_12_09_00_46_boletim_graos_janeiro_2016.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
DOORENBOS J, KASSAM AH Yield response to water. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Paper 33; 1979. 193 p.
DOURADO NETO D, JONG VAN LIER Q. Programa para elaboração do Balanço hídrico para culturas anuais e perenes. Manual do Usuário. Piracicaba: ESALQ; 1991. 58 p.
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA (EMBRAPA). [Internet]. Origem e História do Arroz. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.cnpaf.embrapa.br/arroz/historia.htm . Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
LORENÇONI R, DOURADO NETO D, HEINEMANN AB. Calibração e avaliação do modelo ORYZA-APSIM para o arroz de terras altas no Brasil. Revista Ciência Agronômica, Fortaleza, 2010;41,4: 605-613.
MENEZES RHN. Caracterização agroclimática e análise do rendimento agrícola do estado do Maranhão. [thesis]. Campina Grande: UFCG; 2009. 181f.
MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO (MAPA). [Internet]. Zoneamento Agrícola de Risco Climático para a cultura de arroz de sequeiro no Estado do Maranhão, ano-safra 2017/2018. Disponível em: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/riscos-seguro/risco-agropecuario/portarias/safra-vigente/maranhao. Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
MINUZZI RB, SEDIYAMA GC, DA COSTA JMN, VIANELLO RL. Influência do El nino nas épocas de plantio e fenologia da cultura da soja na Região Sudeste do Brasil. Ceres, 2015;54, n. 313.
PEREIRA JAR. A Cultura do arroz no Brasil: Subsídios para sua história. Brasília: Embrapa Meio Norte, 2002. 226 p.
SENTELHAS PC, MONTEIRO JEBA. Agrometeorologia dos Cultivos: Informações para uma Agricultura Sustentável. In: José Eduardo B. A. Monteiro. (Org.). Agrometeorologia dos Cultivos: O Fator Meteorológico na Produção Agrícola. Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, 2009;1: 3-12.
SILVA GB, AZEVEDO PV. Potencial edafoclimático da "Chapada Diamantina" no Estado da Bahia para o cultivo de citrus. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 2000;8, 1, pp.133-139.
SOUZA RAR. Comportamento de cultivares de arroz de terras altas em função do preparo do solo e irrigação por aspersão, em Latossolo vermelho de cerrado, Brasil. [dissertation]. Ilha Solteira: Faculdade de Engenharia/UNESP;2003.69f.
STEINMETZ S, REYNIERS FN, FOREST F. Evaluation of the climatic risk on upland rice in Brazil. In: Colloque “resistence a la secheresse en millieu intertropicale: quelles recherches pour le moyen terme?” Paris: Cirad.1985. p. 43-54.
THORNTHWAITE CW. An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate. Geographical Review, 1948;38,1:55-94.
THORNTHWAITE CW, MATHER JR. The water balance: publications in climatology. New Jersey: Drexel Institute of Technology. 1955. 104p.
WANDER AE, CHAVES MO. [Internet]. Consumo aparente per capita de arroz no Brasil, 1991 a 2010. Congresso Brasileiro De Arroz Irrigado. 2001; Porto Alegre, 2001. Disponível em: https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/899182/1/se749.pdf. Acesso em: 5 out. 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
