Inventário das aranhas arborícolas de três regiões de Santa Maria, RS, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26966Abstract
This study describes the results 01 seasonal collects 01 arboreal spiders during the years 01 1995 and 1996 in Perau Velho, Cidade dos Meninos and São Marcos, in the outskirts 01 Santa Maria city in Rio Grande do Sul state. They were captured 2381 specimens distributed in 20 families and 65 genera. It is also presented a preliminary list 01 species.
Downloads
References
BEARZI, R. C.; POL TRONIERI, V. C.; LONGHI, S. J. Estrutura fitossociológica do Morro das Três Marias, RS. In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL ESTADUAL, 7, 1992, Nova Prata. Anais ... Nova Prata, 1992, p. 376-379.
BONALDO, A. B.; BRESCOVIT, A. D. As aranhas do gênero Cheiracanthium C.L. Koch,1839, na Região Neotropical. Rvta. bras. Ent., São Paulo, v. 36, n. 4, p. 731-740. Dez.1992.
BRESCOVIT, A. D. Revisão de Anyphaeninae Bertkau a nível de gêneros na região Neotropical (Araneae, Anyphaeninae). Rvta. bres.Zool., Curitiba, v.13, supl. 1, p. 1-187, dez., 1986.
_______ Revisão do grupo prospera do gênero Aysha Keyserling, 1891, na Região Neotropical (Araneae, Anyphaenidae). Iheringia, sér. Zoologia, Porto Alegre, n.72, p. 23 - 104. Ago.1992a.
_______ Revisão das aranhas neoptropicais do gênero Anyphaenoides Berland, 1913 (Araneae, Anyphaenidae). Rvta. bras. Ent. v. 36, n. 4, p. 741-754. Dez. 1992b.
BÜCHERL, W. Aranhas do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Reunião da SBPC, IV, 1952.
_______ Invertebrados: as aranhas. São Paulo, EDART, 1972,158p.
BUSS, R. G. Araneofauna arborícola da região de Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul. Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Fundação Educacional do Vale do Jacuí / Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 79 p.,1993. (Monografia de Especialização)
KASTON, B. J.; KASTON, E. The spiders. lowa, Brown, 1950.220 p.
LEVI, H. W.; LEVI, L. R. The genera of the spider family Theridiidae. Buli. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., Cambridge, v. 127, n. 1, p. 1 - 71, 1962.
LEVI, H. W.; LEVI, L. R. Spiders and their kin. New York, Golden Press, 1990,160 p.
LlSE, A. A.; BRAUL, Jr., A. Acacesia graciosa, a new species from the Neotropical Region. (Araneae, Araneidae). Biociências, Porto Alegre, v. 3, n. 2, p. 179-184, dez. 1995.
MACHADO, P. F. S.; LONGHI, S. J. Aspectos florísticos e fitossociológicos do "Morro do Elefante", Santa Maria, RS. Rev. Centro de Ciências Rurais, Santa Maria, v. 20, n. 3 e 4, p. 261-280. 1990.
MELLO-LEITÃO, C. de. Catálogo das aranhas do Rio Grande do Sul. Arq. Mus. Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, p. 150-244. 1943.
PEREIRA, P. R. B.; GARCIA NETIO, L. R.; BORIN, C. J. A.; BARROSSARTORI, M. G. Contribuição à geografia física do Município de Santa Maria: Unidades de Paisagem. Geografia - Ensino e Pesquisa, Santa Maria, v. 3, p. 37-68.1989.
PIKELlN, B. S. G.; SCHIAPELLI, R. D. Llave para Ia determinación de familias de ararias argentinas. Physis, Buenos Aires, v. 24, n. 67, p. 43-64.1963
PRESTON-MAPHAM, R.; PRESTON-MAPHAM, K. Spiders of the world. New York, Blandford Press ,1984, 191 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
