The urban space: the approach of Chicago Current and Marxist Current

Authors

  • Glaucio José Marafon Departamento de Geociências, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas - CCNE Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM, Santa Maria, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26613

Keywords:

Espaço Urbano, Escola de Chicago, Escola Marxista.

Abstract

The urban space and its approach have arisen interpretations that gather themselves into theoretical-methodologial sources, into paradigms which guide the investigations about urban space. This essay comments on general considerations concerning proposals that guide the urban space approach of Chicago and Marxist Currents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOULMER, M. The Chicago School of Socioly. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1984.

BURGESS, E. W. EI crescimento de Ia ciudad: introdución a un proyeto denvestigación. In THEODORSON, G. A. Estudios de Ecologia Humana 1. Barcelona, Labor, 1974.

CAMPOS, P. A. A dinâmica imobiliária - Elementos para o entendimento da espacialidade urbana. Cadernos IPPUR / UFRJ, RJ. 3 (nr. especial): 47-70, 1989.

CARLOS, A. F, A. A cidade. SP, Contexto, 1992.

CASTELLS, M. Problemas de investigação em Sociologia urbana. SP. Martins Fontes, s/d.

___________ A questão urbana. SP, Contexto, 1992.

CEGET. La Croissance Péripherique des villes du Tiers Monde. La rôle de Ia promotion toncière e imobilière.Talense, 1980.

CLARK, D. Introdução à Geografia Urbana. SP, Ditei, 1985.

CORRÊA, R. L. O espaço urbano: notas te6rico-metodoI6gicas.RJ, 1991 (mimeografado).

___________ O espaço urbano. SP, Ática, 1989.

DAVIDOVICH, F. Focalizando conceituações no urbano. Revista Brasileira de Geografia. RJ, 45(1):137-148,1983.

DELLE DONNE, M. Teorias sobre a cidade. Lisboa, Edições 70, 1979.

DURAND-LASSERVE, A. L'Exclusion des Pauvres dans les villes du Tiers Monde. Paris, L’Hormattan, 1986. FIREY, W. Sentimiento y simbolismo como variables ecológicas. In THEODORSON, G. A. Estudios de Ecologia Humana 1. Barcelona, Labor, 1974.

GONÇALVES, M. F. Processo de urbanização no Brasil: delimitação de um campo de pesquisa. Espaço & Debates. SP, 28: 67-79.

GOTTDIENER, M. A produção social do espaço urbano. SP, Edusp, 1993.

GOTTDIENER, M. & FEAGIN, J. R. Uma mudança de paradigma na sociologia urbana. Espaço & Debates. SP, 28:44-58.

HARVEY, D. The urbanization of capital. Baltimore, The Jhon Hopkins University Press, 1985.

___________ A justiça social e a cidade. Hucitec, SP, 1980.

HAWLEY, A. Ecologia Humana. Madrid, Tecnos, 1982.

HOLLlNGSHEAD, A. B. Noções básicas de Ecologia Humana. In PEARSON, D. Estudos de Ecologia Humana. SP, Martins Fontes, 1948.

JARAMILLO, S. Produción de vivienda y capitalismo dependiente: EI caso de Bogotá. Bogotá, CEDE, 1985.

LEFEBVRE, H. Espaço y Política. EI derecho a Ia ciudad, 11. Barcelona, Península, 1976.

___________ La revolucion urbana. Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1972.

___________ O pensamento marxista e a cidade. Lisboa, Ulissea, 1972.

___________ O direito à cidade. SP, Ed. Documentos, 1969.

MCKENZIE, R. Matéria - Objeto da Ecologia Humana. In PIERSON, D. Estudos de Ecologia Humana. SP, Martins Fontes, 1948.

MOLOTCH, H. e LOGAN, J. The urban Fortune. The Political Economy of Place. Barkeley, The University of California Press, 1987.

PARK, R. E. A cidade: sugestões para a investigação do comportamento humano no meio urbano. In VELHO, G. O fenômeno urbano. RJ, Zahar, 1973.

___________ A comunidade urbana como configuração espacial e ordem moral. In PIERSON, D.

___________ Ecologia Humana. In PIERSON, D. Estudos de Ecologia Humana. SP, Martins Fontes, 1948.

REISSMAN, L. EI processo urbano. Barcelona, Gili S/A, 1972.

RIBEIRO, L. C. A. e LAGO, L. C. (org.). Acumulação urbana e a cidade. RJ, IPPUR/UFRJ,1991.

SANTOS, M. A cidade e o urbano como espaço-tempo. In FERNANDES, A. e GOMES, M. A. (org.). Cidade e História. UFBA, 1992.

SEABRA, O. C. Encontro da Geografia com Henry Lefebvre: notas para uma avaliação crítica a partir da experiência de São Paulo. Anais do Terceiro ENGU. RJ, AGB, p.12-16, 1993.

TOPALOV, C. Les promoteurs immobiliers. Paris, La Haje, 1974.

VIERTLER, R. B. Ecologia Cultural. SP, Ática, 1988. (Série Princípios nr 148).

Downloads

Published

1996-12-09

How to Cite

Marafon, G. J. (1996). The urban space: the approach of Chicago Current and Marxist Current. Ciência E Natura, 18(18), 149–182. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26613

Issue

CIÊNCIA E NATURA, V. 18, N. 18, 1996

Section

Articles

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.