The production of instrutional material and the integration with the high school system: situation and perpectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26353Abstract
Knowing the reality of Physics teaching in the higt. School system of the region of Santa Maria, RS, the Physics Teaching Research Group Physics Department/UFSM (GEF), is taking steps toward the integration of these schools in a teaching-learning process engaged, as much as possible, with the student's every day's life. In the present. work, the basic concepts of this project are presented, the equipment. used is deescribed and the experiments which can be performed at the present status of the project as listed. Finally some considerations are made about the future possibilities of the project.
Downloads
References
AXT, R. GUIMARÃES, V. H. & LIVI, F. P. O ensino de laboratório e a questão do equipamento: Aquisição de pacotes ou desenvolvimento local? Ciência e Cultura, Saio Paulo, 34(12): 1614-1617, 1982.
AXT, R. a GUIMARÃES, V. H. Projeto equipamento para escolas de Nível Médio, Porto Alegre, Instituto de Física UFRGS (ed. interna).
CALEGARl, E. E. Uma verificação da eficiência do ensino experiment.al para a aquisição de conceitos em física a nível de 2º grau. Monografia de Especialização. Santa Maria, Departamento de Física da UFSM, 1987.
PIVA, S. L. D. Levantamento das condições materiais de ensino de laboratório de física nas escolas de 2º grau em Santa Maria. Monografia de Especialização. Santa Maria, Departamento de Física da UFSM, 1987.
PORTO, A. V. L. Atividades experimentais para o ensino de mecânica de fluidos em nível universitário. Dissertação de Mestrado. Porto Alegre, Instituto de Física da UFRGS, 1983.
STANQUE, E. P. O professor de Física do 2º grau em Santa Maria. Monografia de Especialização. Santa Maria, Departamento de Física da UFSM, 1987.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
