Floristic and phytosociological aspects of the forest vegetation in the Osório Mountain, RS, Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X26305Keywords:
florística, fitossociologia, Morro OsórioAbstract
We have studied the floristic composition and phytosocyological struture of the Osório Hill, Osório town, in the littoral of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), from the data collected in a forest inventory, with 10 sample units of 10 x 100m in area for trees with CBH > = 45cm, each one having two circular concentric sub-samples, one of these with 10m2 (radius = 1.78m) and other with 100m2 (radius = 5.64m) for natural regeneration analysis in the classes from 0 to 15 to 45cm of CBH, respectively. We have identifies 65 species belonging to 58 genii of 30 botanic families. Allophylus edulis (St. Hil.) Radlk., Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart., Cupania vernalis Camb., Erythryna falcata Benth., Inga marginata Willd., Luehea divaricata Mart., Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., Pachystroma longifolium (Nees.) I. M. Johnston., Trema micrantha (L.) Blume. e Trichilia clausseni: C. DC. are between the most distinguished species.
Downloads
References
BRASIL, Ministério da Agricultura - Instituto Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Florestal. Inventário Florestal Nacional-Florestas Nativas, Rio Grande do Sul. Brasília, 1983. 435p.
BRAUN BLANQUET, J. Fitossociologia - Base para el estudio de las comunidades vegetales. 3 ed. Madri, H. Blume Ediciones 1979. 820p.
CAIN, S. A.; CASTRO, G. M. de O. Aplication of some phytosociological techniques to Brasilian Rain Forest. Amer. J. Bot.43 (3): 205-271, 1976.
FONT QUER, P. Diccionario de Botanica, 5 ed. Barcelona. Lab.1975. 1224p.
HUECK, K. As Florestas da América do Sul. São Paulo, polígono, 470p.
LACLETTE, P. P. H. Abreviatura de autores. Rodriguesia, 3(11): 257-290, 1937.
LONGHI, S. J. A estrutura de uma floresta natural de angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze., no sul do Brasil. Curitiba, UFPr., 1980. 198p. Dissertação de mestrado.
LONGHI, S. J. Nomenclatura de espécies florestais e ornamentais do Rio Grande do Sul. Santa Maria; CEPEF/FATEC, 1988. 35p. (CEPEF/FATEC - Série Técnica, 3).
MONTOYA MAQUIN, J. M. El acuerdo yangambi (1956) como base para uma nova nomenclatura de tipos de vegetacion en el tropico americano. Turrialba, 16(2): 169-180, 1966.
MORENO, J. A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, Secretaria da Agricultura - Diretoria de Terras e Colonização, 1961. 42p.
RAMBO, B. A Fisionomia do Rio Grande do Sul. 2 ed. Porto Alegre, Livraria Selbach, 1956. 456p.
REITZ, R. et al. Projeto Madeira do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, CORAG, 1988. 530p.
RIZZINI, C. T. Tratado de Fitogeografia do Brasil. São Paulo, EDUSP, 1979. 378p.
SOUZA, P. F. de. Terminologia Florestal – glossário de termos e expressões florestais. Rio de Janeiro, Fundação IBGE, 1973. 304p.
VELOSO, H. P.; KLEIN, R. M. As Comunidades e associações vegetais da Mata Pluvial do Sul do Brasil I. As Comunidades do município de Brusque, Estado de Santa Catarina. Sellowia, 9 (8): 81-236, 1957.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
