Alternative Method of RGB Channel Spectroscopy Using a CCD Reader

Authors

  • Ricardo Gobato Laboratório de Biofísica e Modelagem Molecular. Secretaria de Estado da Educação do Paraná. NRE Londrina.
  • Manuel Simões Filho Departamento de Física. Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Londrina/PR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25617

Keywords:

CCD reader, RGB, Spectroscopy

Abstract

Spectroscopy is a technique for collecting physicochemical data through the transmission, absorption or reflection of incident radiant energy in a sample. Our work is used in common low cost and easy access devices that have a CCD reader. Our idea is a set of devices, such as a cell phone, which contains an optical CCD reader, where these equipment materials, materials, compounds, simplifying the image obtained by these optical devices. As filming obtained by optical CCD reader theses hardware, form decoded and separated into their quantified RGB color channels. Our initial technique consists of the analysis of the pixels of the images of primary light sources, such as: the sun, incandescent lamps, fire, candle flames, matchestick flame, wood combustion, etc. We conclude that it is possible to do a spectroscopic analysis using our technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. E. NEWNHAM. Properties of materials. Anisotropy, Simmetry, Structure. Oxford University press, New York, 2005.

T. T. GROVE AND M. F. MASTERS. A student assembled spectrograph with ccd detector to assist with student understanding of spectrometry. Physics Department, Indiana University.

C. DE IZARA AND O. VALLEE. On the use of linear ccd image sensors in optics experiments. Am. J. Phys., 62:357–361, 1994.

M. VANNONI AND G. MOLESINI. Speckle interferometry experiments with a digital photo camera. Am. J. Phys.,72:906–09, 2004.

K. ROTH. CHEM. Unserer Zeit.., 37:424–429, 2003.

K. ROTH. Chemie in unserer zeit/wiley-vch. Freie Universität Berlin, 2011.

J. WALKER. Sci. Amer, (238):154, 1978.

M. FARADAY. The Chemical History of a Candle. Dover, Mineola, USA, Dover, Mineola, USA, 2002.

M. SIMOES F. AND R. GOBATO. Espectroscopia por Mapeamento RGB de Fontes Primárias de Luz. In XIX Semana da Física. Simpósio Comemorativo dos 40 Anos do Curso de Física da Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Sep 15-19 2014.

M. SIMOES F. AND R. GOBATO. Espectroscopia por Mapeamento RGB de Fontes Primárias de Luz. viXra.org. Condensed Matter, page 366, Jan. 06 2017. viXra:1701.0306.

CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Creative commons. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, May 2016. CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

FNDE Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educaç ao. FNDE, 2012.

R. GHEDIN. Estes são os tablets (sim, no plural) da Positivo que o MEC distribuirá aos professores do ensino público, Fev. 01 2013.

P. REPKIN AND Y. G. ELSHIN. Yowindow, Jan. 2009-2016.

W. Rasband. ImageJ 1.51i.

Planeta Delphi - Tudo sobre programação Delphi, Jan 12 2017.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-23

How to Cite

Gobato, R., & Simões Filho, M. (2017). Alternative Method of RGB Channel Spectroscopy Using a CCD Reader. Ciência E Natura, 39(2), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25617

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Physics

License

To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.

 

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 

Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)