ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS SUPPLY FROM FARMING FAMILY FOR THE NATIONAL SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMME (PNAE) ARE IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SÃO GABRIEL-RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X21889Keywords:
Public policy. Food acquisition program. Production. Distribution of food.Abstract
Through the National School Food Program (PNAE) and the Food Acquisition Program (PAA) the State seeks to deploy a Public Policy in order to promote family farming providing distribution opportunities for farmers meeting the food needs of public school students. The work aims to analyze the supply of products from family farms in San Gabriel / RS for the PNAE and verify the effectiveness of this policy at the municipal level. The research was exploratory and had a qualitative approach, development of theoretical framework, site visits and construction and application of semistructured interviews with public officials and family farmers. The results revealed that the supply process includes few farmers and does not reach the goal set forth by law.Downloads
References
ALCANTARA, R. L. C.; SOUZA, A. P. O. Alternativas de mercado para a agricultura: a realidade dos produtos hortículas orgânicos no Brasil In: Batalha, M. O. Gestão do Agronegócio. São Carlos: EDUFSCAR, 2009.
BOTELHO FILHO, F. B. As portas de saída da pobreza e as estratégias da agricultura familiar para os negócios rurais In: Agricultura Familiar e Desenvolvimento Territorial – Contribuições ao Debate. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília. Centro de Estudos Avançados Multidisciplinares, Núcleo de Estudos Avançados. v.5. n. 17, 2005. p 131-140.
IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Agropecuário 2006. Available from: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/agropecuaria/censoagro/2006_segunda_apuracao/default_tab_xls.shtm.
GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 4.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
LEAL, A. E. M.; SOUZA, C. E. G. Construindo o Conhecimento pela Pesquisa: orientação básica para elaboração de trabalhos científicos. Santa Maria: Sociedade Vicente Pallotti, 2006.
MINISTÉRIO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO AGRÁRIO, Cartilha Orgânicos na Alimentação Escolar. Available from: http://www.fnde.gov.br/programas/alimentacao-escolar/alimentacao-escolar-material-de-divulgacao/alimentacao-manuais/item/5240-cartilha-orgânicos-na-alimentação-escolar.
MATTEI, L. Programa de aquisição de alimentos da agricultura familiar (PAA): antecedentes, concepção e composição geral do Programa. Avaliação de políticas de aquisição de alimentos, n. 27, 2007. p. 33-44.
PEIXINHO, A. M. L. A trajetória do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar no período de 2003-2010: relato do gestor nacional. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2013.18(4): p.909-916.
RUA, Maria das Graças. Políticas Públicas. Florianópolis: Departamento de Ciências da Administração/UFSC; [Brasília]: CAPES: UAB, 2009.
SECCHI, L. Políticas Públicas – Conceitos, esquemas de análise, casos práticos. 2. ed. Cengage Learning, 2013.168 p.
VEIGA, José Eli da. O Brasil rural precisa de uma estratégia de desenvolvimento. Brasília: Convênio FIPE – IICA (MDA/CNDRS/NEAD) 2001.
VILLA REAL, L. C.; SCHNEIDER, S. O uso de programas públicos de alimentação na reaproximação do pequeno agricultor com o consumidor: o caso do programa de alimentação escolar. ESTUDO & DEBATE, Lajeado, v. 18, n. 2, 2011. p. 57-79.
TRICHES, R. M.; SCHNEIDER, S. Alimentação Escolar e Agricultura Familiar: reconectando o consumo à produção. Saúde e Sociedade, São Paulo, v.19, n.4, 2010. p.933-945.
TURPIN, M. E. A Alimentação Escolar como Fator de Desenvolvimento Local por meio do Apoio aos Agricultores Familiares. Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional, Campinas, 16(2): 2009. p. 20-42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
