Teaching Methods in Architectural Design Basics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X20868Abstract
During its changes, architecture teaching, bump into several concerns from initial academic teaching up to nowand it always tolerates some of them permanently. During recent years, many researches went through thatactions with regard to the content debate and organizing architectural teaching. In this present article, we bestshot to go one-step forward in order to solve one of the problems teacher hit upon through method expression andconsideration of teaching method for Architectural Design Basics Courses. Some of these issues for investigationinclude, which goals nail down Architectural Design Basics Courses in university teaching system in Iran?What are the methods and approaches for teaching these courses? Which factors shall investigated beforestarting class session? Which factors are effective on learning process? According to methodology, we started todo research through observation and gathering poll of three universities holding three levels of teaching record inarchitecture (University of Tehran, Marlik Institute of Higher Education and FakhrRazi Institute of HigherEducation), we out –and- out ideas of students and professors of these courses. In addition, through introducingmethods to teach architecture lessons which investigated by researchers during recent years, we will put forwardfor solutions to improve teaching in Architectural Design Basics. In this article, we took advantage fromscanning investigation, we applied observation, library study, and questionnaire to congregate information, andwe brought off quality analysis through a grounded theory approach. In concordance with investigation results,one of the success factors for Architectural Design Basics is dramatize many practices which fired up byprofessors through bring into play different teaching methods.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
