Potencial de Geração de Biogás a Partir da Suplementação de Óleo de Babaçu em Dejetos de Animais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X19369Keywords:
Energia renovável, biogás, digestão anaeróbia, óleo de babaçu, desenvolvimento sustentável.Abstract
O presente trabalho objetiva avaliar o comportamento e o potencial de geração de biogás através do blend de dejetos de bovinos, suínos e aves quando suplementado com óleo de babaçu. O uso de oleaginosas para fins energéticos em comunidades isoladas que não possuem acesso às redes convencionais de distribuição de energia elétrica está sendo bastante discutido, uma vez que há vasta disponibilidade destas biomassas na Região Amazônica e poucas atividades econômicas sustentáveis em torno da mesma. O estudo foi desenvolvido no Laboratório de Biorreatores do Centro Universitário UNIVATES, sendo a avaliação da geração de biogás realizada através de um dispositivo baseado no deslocamento de fluidos e na equação combinada dos gases ideais, enquanto o teor de metano contido no biogás foi verificado através de um sensor específico para este fim, denominado Advanced Gasmitter. Os resultados obtidos demonstram que a aplicação de óleo de babaçu (OB) em resíduos agrícolas melhora o rendimento de biogás e de metano, sendo que o tratamento suplementado com 7,5% de OB o qual obteve melhor desempenho.
Downloads
References
Anderson, G.K., Yang, G. (1992). Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration. Water Environment Research, v. 64, pp. 53–59.
Astals, S., Nolla-Ardèvol, V., Mata-Alvarez, J. (2012). Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology, v. 110, pp. 63-70.
Dalmau, J., Comas, J., Rodrıíguez-Roda, I., Pagilla, K., Steyer, J.P. (2010). Model development and simulation for predicting risk of foaming in anaerobic digestion systems. Bioresource Technology, v.101 (12), pp. 4306-4314.
Fernández, A. Sánchez, X. (2005). Anaerobic co-digestion of a simulated organic fraction of municipal solid wastes and fats of animal and vegetable origin. Biochem. Eng. J., 26, pp. 22–28.
Fountoulakis, M.S., Petousi, I., Manios, T. (2010). Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerine to boost biogas production. Waste Management, v. 30, pp. 1849 – 1853.
Gelegenis, J.; Georgakakis, D.; Angelidaki, I.; Christopoulou, N.; Goumenaki, M. (2007). Optimization of biogas production from olive-oil mill wastewater, by codigesting with diluted poultry-manure. Applied Energy, v.84, pp.646-663.
Kivaisi, A.K., Mtila, M. Production of biogas from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) (Mart) (Solms) in a two stage bioreactor (1998). World J. Microbiol. Technol., V. 14, pp. 125–131.
Konrad, O., Koch, F.F., Lumi, M., Tonetto, J., Bezama, A. (2014). Potential of biogas production from swine manure supplemented with glycerine waste. Eng. Agríc. Jaboticabal, v.34, n.5, pp.844-853.
Ma, J., Van Wambeke, M., Carballa, M., Verstraete, W. (2007). Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by codigestion with glycerol. Biotechnology Lett., v. 30, pp. 861–867.
Mata-Alvarez, J., Dosta, J., Macé, S., Astals, S. Codigestion of solid wastes: a review of its uses and perspectives including modelling. (2011). Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., v.31 (2), pp. 99-111.
Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S., Llabrés, P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. (2000). Bioresource Technology, v. 74 (1), pp. 3-16.
Moeller, L., Lehnig, M., Schenk, J., Zehnsdorf, A. Foam formation in biogas plants caused by anaerobic digestion of sugar beet. (2015). Bioresource Technology, v.178 (0), pp.270-277.
Mora-Naranajo, N., Meima, J.A., Haarstrick, A., Hempel, D.C. Modelling and experimental investigation of environmental influences on the acetate and methane formation in solid waste. (2004). Waste Management, v. 24, pp. 9.763-773.
Mshandete, A., Kivaisi, M., Rubindamayugi, M., Mattiasson, B. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. (2004). Bioresource Technology, v.95, pp. 19-24.
Neves, L., Oliveira, R., Alves, M.M. Co-digestion of cow manure, food waste and intermittent input of fat. (2009). Bioresource Technology, v. 100, pp. 1957–1962.
Pommier, S., Chenu, D., Quintard, M., Lefebvre, X. A logistic model for the prediction of the influence of water on the solid waste methanization in landills. (2007). Biotechnology and Bioengineering, v, 97(3), pp. 473-482.
Razaviarani, V., Buchanan, I.D., Malik, S., Katalambula, H. Pilot scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge with biodiesel waste glycerine. (2013). Bioresource Technology, v. 133, pp. 206-212.
Saidu, M., Yuzir, A., Salim, M.R., Salmiati., Azman, S., Abdullah, N. Biological pre-treated oil palm mesocarp fibre with cattle manure for biogas production by anaerobic digestion during acclimatization phase. (2014). International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, v.95, pp.189-194.
Silvestre, G., Fernández, G., Bonmati, A. Addition of crude glycerine as strategy to balance the C/N ratio on sewage sludge thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion. (2015). Bioresource Technology, v. 193, pp. 377-385.
Sun, Y., Wang, D., Yan, J., Qiao, W., Wang, W., Zhu, T. Effects of lipid concentration on anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass wastes. (2014). Waste Management v. 34, pp. 1025–1034.
Zhang, C., Xiao, G., Peng, L., Su, H.,Tan, T. The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. (2013). Bioresource Technoogy, v. 129, pp. 170–176.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.