ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AND SOCIETY: A STUDY OF PUBLIC SUPPLY SOURCE OF SANTANA DO MUNDAÚ – AL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17168Keywords:
Palavras-chave, Manancial, DegradaçãoAmbiental, AbastecimentoPúblico, Santana do Mundaú.Abstract
This work is to analyze the level of degradation of the source of public water supply of the city of Santana do Mundaú as well as the quality and waste water phases capitation and distribution. For this two steps were performed , the first of which consisted of a deepening of the relevant object of research by providing theoretical and methodological issues necessary contribution to understanding the topic . On Monday, we did a study in locus, which delimit the desktop sub - Mundaú River Basin, Basin Creek Carurú; determine some physical parameters of the basin in question and diagnose the causative factors of negative impacts on public drinking fountain. The study showed that the basin to basin creek Carurú suffers some negative impacts such as removal of riparian vegetation , soil compaction by trampling of animals , improper disposal of solid waste , indiscriminate use of pesticides on the banks of the creek Caruru caused by potentially polluting human activities , another finding is related to the quality of water that people consume , despite laboratory tests claim that the water quality is satisfactory their own analyzes are not as strict deserving to be reassessed , because some data are insufficient for a complete analysis the water situation.Downloads
References
REFERENCIAS
ANVISA. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Lei 9.782 de 26 de janeiro de 1999. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9782.htm. Acesso em: 12 de dezembro de 2014.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ÁGUAS SUBTERRÂNEA – ABAS http://www.abas.org/educacao.php. Acesso em: 16 de outubro de 2013.
BRASIL. Instituto de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Cidades, 2014.
BRASIL – Código de Águas 1934. Decretonº 24.643 10 de julho de 1934, art. 1º e 2º e Legislação correlata. – Brasilia: Senado Federal. Subsecretaria de Edições Técnicas, 2003.
BRASIL–Ministério do Meio Ambiente – MMA.Lei 9.433, de 08 de jan. 1997. Da Política Nacional de Recursos Hídricos. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/ . Acesso em: 05 de janeiro 2014.
BRASIL– Ministério do Meio Ambiente – MMA.Resolução CONAMA 357/2005. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/. Acesso em: 12 de agosto de 2014.
CHRISTOFOLETTI, A. Geomorfologia. 2ª Ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher Ltda e EDUSP, 1974.
FILHO, C. F. M. Abastecimento de Água. Universidade Federal de Campina Grande – UFCG - Campina Grande – PB. Disponível em: http://www.dec.ufcg.edu.br /saneamento/Agua.html. Acesso em: 04 de agosto de 2014.
GUERRA, A. J. T. Geomorfologia: Uma atualização de bases e conceitos/ organização, 6ª ed.- Rio de Janeiro : Bertrand Brasil, 2005. p. 95
MASATO. K.; Mota, A. A.; Corseuil, C. W. Recursos hídricos e saneamento, Curitiba: Ed. Organic Trading, 2008.
MOREIRA, H. e CALEFFE, L. G. Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lamparina, 2008
RICCOMINI, C. et al.; Rios e processos aluviais. In: TEXEIRA, W. et al. Decifrando a Terra. São Paulo: Oficina do Texto, 2000.
Relatório de Desenvolvimento Humano - HDR. ÁGUA PARA CONSUMO HUMANO, UNESCO, 2006.
SOUZA, M. L. ABC do Desenvolvimento Urbano, 3ª edição, Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2007.
TEXEIRA, W. et al.; (org). Decifrando a Terra. 2ª edição. São Paulo: CEN, 2009.
TORRES, F. T. P.; MACHADO, P. J. O. Introdução a hidrogeografia, São Paulo: CENGAGE Learning, 2012.
TUCCI, C. E. M. Gestão da água no Brasil – Brasília: UNESCO, 2001. p 79.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
