Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378640128

Mots-clés :

Metaphysics, Unconscious, Personal experience, Tragic

Résumé

The purpose of this article is to clarify how the Janus face of Schopenhauer´s philosophy guided the relation between Nietzsche and the author of The World as Will and Representation. This aspect has been neglected by the Nietzsche research, perhaps judging this relation as a topic exhausted in pairings such as “adherence and rupture”, “enchantment and estrangement”, “pessimism and life affirmation”. That said, at a first preliminary moment we will analyze the dual face of Schopenhauer`s philosophy, with his gaze simultaneously towards past and future. At a second preliminary moment, we will approach Schopenhauer´s daring attitude of converting philosopher´s failed ambitions (thinking, of course, on the thing-in-itself) on the unconscious principle of the will. From them on, we are going to tackle Nietzsche´s grasp of Schopenhauer as a philosopher who, vulnerable to his second nature, a German nature, avoid featuring the very tragic philosophy that he reaches to touch, in the favor of a metaphysical treatment of his audacious discovery – the unconscious in human species.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Saulo Krieger, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP

Doutorado em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de São Paulo (com doutorado-sanduíche na Université de Reims, Champagne-Ardennes)

Références

ASSOUN, P.-L. Freud et Nietzsche. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.

ASSOUN, P.-L. Freud - La philosophie et les philosophes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1976.

BOZICKOVIC, V. Schopenhauer on Scientific Knowledge. In: VANDENABEELE, B. A Companion to Schopenhauer. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, p. 11-24.

GARDNER, S. Schopenhauer Will and the Unconscious. In: JANAWAY, C. The Cambridge Companion do Schopenhauer. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press, 1999, p. 375-421.

GÖDDE, G. Traditionslinien des “Unbewußten”. Schopenhauer – Nietzsche – Freud. Gießen: Psychosocial-Verlag, 2009.

KRIEGER, S. O cerne oculto do projeto nietzschiano: logos versus pathos no ato de filosofar. Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Escola de Filosofia, Ciências Humanas e Letras da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp) em abril de 2019.

JACQUETTE, D. Schopenhauer’s Proof that Thing-in-Self is Will. Kantian Review, 12, 2006, p. 65-108.

JANAWAY, C. Introduction. In: JANAWAY, C. The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 1-17.

MARQUES, U. R. A. (org.) Kant e a biologia. São Paulo: Barcarolla, 2012.

NIETZSCHE. F. Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (KGW). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1967-1978.

NIETZSCHE. F. Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe (KSA). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1999.

NIETZSCHE. F. A gaia ciência. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.

NIETZSCHE. F. Além do bem e do mal. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.

NIETZSCHE. F. Além do bem e do mal. Trad. Saulo Kriger. São Paulo: Edipro, 2019

NIETZSCHE. F. Aurora. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

NIETZSCHE. F. Ecce homo. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.

NIETZSCHE. F. Humano, demasiado humano I. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.

NIETZSCHE. F. Humano, demasiado humano II. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

NIETZSCHE. F. O nascimento da tragédia. Trad. Jacob Guinsburg. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.

SCHENZ, A. Erlebnis und Bildung. Die Bedeutung des Erlebens und des Erlebnisses in Unterrichts- und Erziehungsprozessen.

Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, 2007.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Zweiter Band. München: Georg Müller, 1913 (W II).

SCHOPENHAUER, A. O mundo como vontade e como representação. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2005 (W I).

SEGALA, M. Philosophie de la Nature et science chez Schopenhauer. In: Schopenhauer – Nouvelles Lectures. Les Études

Philosophiques, 2012/3, no 102, p. 389-408.

SOLL, I. Schopenhauer as Nietzsche´s ‘Great Teacher’ and ‘Antipode’. In: GEMES K. & RICHARDSON, J. The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SOMMER, A. U. O que Nietzsche leu e o que não leu. Trad. Saulo Krieger. Cadernos Nietzsche, São Paulo, v. 40 n. 1, janeiro/abril 2019, p. 9-43.

VIESENTEINER, J. L. O conceito de vivência (Erlebnis) em Nietzsche. Gênese, significado e recepção. Kriterion, Belo Horizonte, n. 127, junho 2013, p. 141-155.

ZAMBONINI, F. Schopenhauer e la scienza moderna: discorso per la solene inaugurazione dell’anno accademico della Reale Università di Sassari. Sassari: Tip. Dita G. Dess, 1911.

Publiée

2019-12-18

Comment citer

Krieger, S. (2019). Animality and apostasy of the will: Nietzsche looking at Schopenhauer. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378640128