To what extent is Wittgenstein a foundationalist?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378666403

Keywords:

Wittgenstein, On Certainty, Foundationalism

Abstract

Ludwig Wittgenstein’s On Certainty (1969) carries important considerations about how we justify our knowledge. In particular, the work introduces us to the so-called hinge propositions. Faced with the multiplicity of interpretations of this concept, we pervasively encounter the discussion about whether they imply a foundationalism. If the ideas present in Wittgenstein's later works are commonly considered anti-foundationalist, then why would this not also be the case in On Certainty? On the one hand, authors such as Stroll (1994) understand that there is a type of foundationalist proposal. On the other hand, authors like Williams (2005) defend anti-foundationalism. From the analysis of both positions, we argue that an anti-foundationalist reading is more appropriate. Finally, enabled by anti-foundationalism, we present our antidogmatic reading whose objective is to emphasize that the work has the purpose of teaching us how to do philosophy without ignoring or disqualifying the diversity of existing cultures and perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hugo Ribeiro Mota, University of Oslo, Oslo, Noruega.

Doutorando em Filosofia na Universidade de Oslo (UiO) - Departamento de Filosofia, Clássicos, História da Arte e das Ideias, Oslo, Noruega.

References

ANNAS, J.; BARNES, J. The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

ASHTON, Rethinking Epistemic Relativism. Metaphilosophy, v. 50, n. 5, p. 587–607, 2019.

COLIVA, A. Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?. Philosophical Investigations, v. 33, p. 1–23, 2010.

CONWAY, G. Wittgenstein on Foundations. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1989.

ETCHEVERRY, K. M. O Fundacionismo Clássico revisitado na Epistemologia Contemporânea. 2009. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grade do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.

HACKER, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.

HASAN, A.; FUMERTON, R. Foundationalist Theories of Epistemic Justification. In: ZALTA, E.N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/justep-foundational/.

KUSCH, M. Wittgenstein’s On Certainty and Relativism. Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives. Proceedings of the 37th International Wittgenstein Symposium, p. 29–46, 2016.

McGINN, M. Sense and Certainty: A Dissolution of Scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.

MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. The Animal in Epistemology: Wittgenstein’s Enactivist Solution to the Problem of Regress. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, v. 6, p. 97–119, 2016.

PRITCHARD, D. Wittgenstein on Skepticism. In: MCGINN, M.; KUUSELA, O. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 521–547.

PRITCHARD, D. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.

RICHTER, D. Wittgensteinian Foundationalism. Erkenntnis, v. 55, n. 3, p. 349–358, 2001.

ROLLA, G. Epistemologia: uma introdução elementar. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2018.

SECCO, G. D.; PEREIRA, L. C. Proofs Versus Experiments: Wittgensteinian Themes Surrounding the Four-Color Theorem. In: SILVA, M. (ed.). How Colours Matter to Philosophy. Synthese Library. Springer International Publishing, 2017, p. 289–307.

SELLARS, W. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. In: Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge, 1963, p. 127–196.

SILVA, M. Persuasion over convincement: On the role of conversion in logical conflicts between realists and anti-realists. In: MORENO, A. (org). Wittgenstein e seus aspectos. Coleção CLE, v. 39, 2015, p. 143-166.

STROLL, A. Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

WILLIAMS, M. Why Wittgenstein Isn’t a Foundationalist. In: MOYAL-SHARROCK, D.; BRENNER, W. (eds.). Readings of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, p. 47–58.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Über Gewissheit, On Certainty. ANSCOMBE, G.E.M.; WRIGHT, G.H. (eds.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophische Untersuchungen, Philosophical Investigations. HACKER, P.M.S.; SCHULTE, J. (eds.). 4ª ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Trad. Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos. São Paulo: Edusp, 2017.

WRIGHT, C. Facts and Certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy, v. 71, p. 429–472, 1985.

Published

2021-12-28 — Updated on 2022-03-16

Versions

How to Cite

Mota, H. R. (2022). To what extent is Wittgenstein a foundationalist?. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), e02. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378666403 (Original work published December 28, 2021)