Pessimism and politics: conservatism and social criticism based on Schopenhauer

Authors

  • Flamarion Caldeira Ramos Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378636052

Keywords:

Pessimism, Politics, Conservatism, History, Solidarity

Abstract

The relationship between politics and pessimism, or more precisely, between the possibility of social and political change on the one hand, and the metaphysical rejection of that possibility on the other, has been striking in the reception of Schopenhauer's philosophy since the nineteenth century. On the one hand, a wide range of authors will mobilize pessimistic arguments that either coincide or are inspired by Schopenhauer to defend an immobilist and conservative perspective of politics and, on the other hand, several authors will use arguments present in the philosophy of Schopenhauer as a denunciation of the conditions of injustice in modern capitalist societies. For this reason, it is possible to emphasize both a "Schopenhauerian right" and a "Schopenhauerian left". In the present article, I will try to present a general picture of the reception of Schopenhauer's philosophy as far as the ideology is concerned. It is based on an analysis of the link between his pessimism and his political philosophy and leads to the various uses of pessimism made to justify the most diverse positions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Flamarion Caldeira Ramos, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP.

Professor da Universidade Federal do ABC. Coordenador do GT Schopenhauer da ANPOF.

References

BARBOZA, Jair. “Sabedoria de vida e práxis em Schopenhauer ou sobre uma possível “esquerda” schopenhaueriana”. In: Filosofia alemã de Kant a Hegel. Organização de Marcelo Carvalho e Vinicius Figueiredo. São Paulo: ANPOF, 2013.

BRANN, Henry Walter. Schopenhauer und das Judentum. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag, 1975.

CATTANEO, Mario. “Das Problem des Strafrechts im Denken Schopenhauers”, In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, n. 67, 1986, pp. 95-112.

CATTANEO, Mario. “Schopenhauers Kritik der Kantischen Rechtslehre” In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, nº 69, 1988, pp. 399-407.

COLIN, René-Pierre. Schopenhauer en France. Un mythe naturaliste. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon, 1979, p. 128. Apud. COMPAGNON, A. Os antimodernos: De Joseph de Maistre a Roland Barthes. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 2011.

COMPAGNON, Antoine. Os antimodernos: De Joseph de Maistre a Roland Barthes. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 2011.

EBELING, H. e LÜTKHAUS, L. (orgs.), Schopenhauer und Marx: Philosophie des Elends, Elend der Philosophie? Königstein, Hain, 1980.

HAMLYN, D.W. “Eternal Justice”. In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, nº 69, 1988, pp. 281-288.

HORKHEIMER, Max. Materialismo e Metafísica. In: Teoria Crítica I, Trad. de Hilde Cohn, São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2006.

HORKHEIMER, Max. “Schopenhauer und die Gesellschaft”, In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch no 36, Frankurt am Main, 1955, pp. 49-57.

HORKHEIMER, Max. “Die Aktualität Schopenhauers”, In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, no 42, Frankurt am Main, pp. 12-25, 1961.

KROON, Annette Godart-van der. “Schopenhauer’s Theory of Justice and its Implication to Natural Law”. In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, nº 84, 2003, pp. 121-145.

KÜPPER, Georg. “Der Begriff des Unrechts bei Schopenhauer”. In: Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, nº 74, 1993, pp. 103-114.

LOSURDO, Domenico. Nietzsche: o rebelde aristocrata: biografia intelectual e balanço crítico. Trad. Jaime A. Clasen. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2009.

LÖWITH, Karl. De Hegel à Nietzsche. Gallimard, Paris, 1969.

LUKÁCS, Georg. Schopenhauer. In: EBELING, H.; LÜTKHAUS, L. (orgs.) Schopenhauer und Marx: Philosophie des Elends, Elend der Philosophie? Königstein: Hain, 1980.

LUKÁCS, Georg. El Asalto a la Razón. Trad. de Wenceslao Roces. Barcelona, Grijalbo, 1976.

LUKÁCS, Georg. História e Consciência de classe. Trad. de Rodnei Nascimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

LÜTKEHAUS, Ludger. Einleitung II: Pessimismus und Praxis. Umrisse einer kritischen Philosophie des Elends. In: EBELING, H.; LÜTKEHAUS, L (Orgs.). Schopenhauer und Marx: Philosophie des Elends - Elend der Philosophie?. Königstein/Ts.: Hain, 1980, pp. 23-39.

LÜTKEHAUS, Ludger. „Esiste una sinistra schopenhaueriana? Ovvero: il pessimismo è un quietismo?” In: FAZIO, D.; KOßLER, M.; LÜTKEHAUS, L. (Orgs.). Arthur Schopenhauer e la sua scuola: Lecce: Pensa Multimedia, 2007.

MAINLÄNDER, Phillip. Philosophie der Erlösung. In: ______. Schriften, org. por Winfried Müller-Seyfarth, Hildesheim, Zürich, New York, Olms Verlag, 4 vols, 1996.

MÜNKLER, Herfried. “Ein janusköpfiger Konservatismus: Arthur Schopenhauers politische Ideen”. In: Spierling, V. (org). Schopenhauer im Denken der Gegenwart. Munique: Piper, 1987, pp. 217-237.

PAUEN, Michael. Pessimismus: Geschichtsphilosophie, Metaphysik und Moderne von Nietzsche bis Spengler. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1997.

POST, W. Kritische Theorie und metaphysischer Pessimismus. Zum Spätwerk Max Horkheimers. München: Kösel Verlag, 1971.

ROSSET, Clément. Schopenhauer, Philosophe de L’absurde. Paris: PUF, 1967.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Sämtliche Werke. Editadas e comentadas criticamente por Arthur Hübscher, Wiesbaden, F. A. Brockhaus, 7 vols, 1972.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Parerga und Paralipomena. Zurique: Haffmans, 2 vols, 1988.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Sobre o Fundamento da Moral. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Cacciola, São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 1995.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Sobre a ética. (Capítulos 8 – 15 de Parerga e Paralipomena de Arthur Schopenhauer). Organização e tradução de Flamarion C. Ramos. São Paulo: Hedra, 2012.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. O Mundo como Vontade e como Representação. Primeiro tomo. Tradução de Jair Barboza. 2ª. edição, São Paulo: Unesp, 2015a.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. O Mundo como Vontade e como Representação. Segundo tomo: Suplementos aos quatro livros do primeiro tomo Tradução de Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Unesp, 2015b.

Published

2018-12-24

How to Cite

Ramos, F. C. (2018). Pessimism and politics: conservatism and social criticism based on Schopenhauer. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 9(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378636052