This is an outdated version published on 2010-07-01. Read the most recent version.

De Kant a Schopenhauer: análise da Terceira Antinomia da Razão Pura e de sua solução

Authors

  • Fabiano Queiroz da Silva Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378634138

Keywords:

Third Antinomy, Kant, Schopenhauer

Abstract

This paper will be divided in Three topics: “I. The antinomic conflicts of reason with itself”, “II. Reconstruction of the arguments of the Third Antinomy and of the critical solution” and “III. Transcendental Freedom and Practical Freedom”. The first will argue of what consists the antinomic problem. The second is about the third antinomic problem and the critical solution given by Kant. Last but not least, the third will present a discussion between Kant and Schopenhauer, underlining the reason why Schopenhauer’s solution to the Third Antinomy should be refused, and Kant’s solution should not.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabiano Queiroz da Silva, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP

Doutorando em Filosofia – UNICAMP. Membro do grupo de pesquisa Criticismo e Semântica.

References

BECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. “O Lugar Sistemático do Conceito de Liberdade na Filosofia Crítica Kantiana”. Kant e-prints. Campinas, Série 2, v. 1, n.1, p. 31-56, 2006.

ESTEVES, Júlio César Ramos. “Kant tinha de compatibilizar tese e antítese”. Analytica, v. 2, n. 1, p. 123-173, 1997.

GUILLERMIT, L. “Kant e a filosofia crítica” (1973). Tradução de Guido Antonio de Almeida. In História da filosofia. Org: François Châtelet. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1975.

KANT, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (KrV). In: Werke. Editadas por W. Weischedel. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgeselschaft, 2005, vol. II.

KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura (KrV). Tradução de Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujão. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.

LOPARIC, Zeljko. “Os problemas da razão pura e a semântica transcendental”. Doispontos, Curitiba, São Carlos, v. 2, p. 113-128, 2005a.

LOPARIC, Zeljko. A Semântica Transcendental de Kant. Campinas: UNICAMP, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência, 2005b.

SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. O mundo como vontade e como representação // Apêndice Crítica da filosofia kantiana. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2005.

Capa Voluntas v.1, n.1

Downloads

Published

2010-07-01

Versions

How to Cite

Silva, F. Q. da. (2010). De Kant a Schopenhauer: análise da Terceira Antinomia da Razão Pura e de sua solução. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378634138

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010): Estudos sobre Schopenhauer – Ed. 01

Section

Schopenhauer: freedom and reason

License

The submission of original manuscripts to this journal implies the transference, by the authors, of the copyrights for printed and digital publication. The copyrights of a published manuscript belong ultimately to the author, and only the copyright for its first publication is reserved to the journal. Authors may only use the same results in other publications explicitly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. 

Licence

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) - This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.