Is Coronavirus an object? Metametaphysics meets medical sciences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378643633

Keywords:

Naturalized ontology, Metaphysics, Metametaphysics, Epidemiology, Scientific realism, Unavailable metaphysical stories.

Abstract

In ontological terms, what can we learn from the current state of the art in Epidemiology? Applying the Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, we can learn that there are several fundamental entities for the theory to work. One is a virus type entity, in which the (in)famous Coronavirus is a particular case. In metaphysical terms, this entity can, in principle, be understood in several ways. One of those ways, apparently, and perhaps intuitively, is the notion of object. Applying the metametaphysical method of Unavailable Metaphysical Stories, we found that Epidemiology is incompatible with an object metaphysics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Raoni Wohnrath Arroyo, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC

PhD in Philosophy at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC

References

ANDERSEN, K.; RAMBAUT, A.; LIPKIN, W.; HOLMES, E.;

GARRY, R. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature medicine, v. 26, n. 4, p. 450–452, 2020.

ARENHART, J. Ontological frameworks for scientific theories. Foundations of science, Springer, v. 17, n. 4, p. 339–356, 2012.

ARROYO, R. Discussions on physics, metaphysics and metametaphysics: Interpreting quantum mechanics. PhD Dissertation. Florianópolis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2020.

ARROYO R.; ARENHART, J. Between Physics and Metaphysics: A Discussion of the Status of Mind in Quantum Mechanics. In: de Barros J., Montemayor C. (Eds.). Quanta and Mind: Essays on the Connection between Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness. Cham: Springer, 2019.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

D’AMICO, R. Disease and the Concept of Supervenience. In: Kincaid, H. and McKitrick, J. (Eds.). Establishing Medical Reality: Essays in the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Biomedical Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. P. 35–45.

DUPRÉ, J.; GUTTINGER, S. Viruses as living processes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, v. 59, p. 109-116, 2016.

FRENCH, S. Handling Humility. In: Galparsoro, J.; Cordero, A. (Eds.). Reflections on Naturalism. Plantijnstraat: Springer, 2013. P. 85–104.

FRENCH, S. The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

FRENCH, S. Realism and Metaphysics. In: Saatsi, J. (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. New York: Routledge, 2018. P. 394–406.

FRENCH, S; KRAUSE, D. Identity in physics: A historical, philosophical, and formal analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

GHISELIN, T. A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Systematic Zoology, v. 23, n. 4, p. 536-544, 1974.

HARMAN, G. An outline of object-oriented philosophy. Science Progress, v. 96, n. 2, 187–199, 2013.

HULL, D. Are Species Really Individuals? Systematic Zoology, v. 25, n. 2, p. 174–191, 1976.

KINCAID, H. and MCKITRICK, J. Introduction. In: Kincaid, H. and MCKITRICK, J. (Eds.). Establishing Medical Reality: Essays in the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Biomedical Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. P. 1–11.

KORMAN, D. Ordinary Objects. In: Zalta, E. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring Edition, 2016. Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/ordinary-objects/>. Access: 16th April, 2020.

KRÄMER A.; KRETZSCHMAR, M.; KRICKEBERG, K. Modern infectious disease: Epidemiology concepts, methods, mathematical models, and public health. New York: Springer, 2010.

KUKLA, R. Infertility, epistemic risk, and disease definitions. Synthese v. 196, p. 4409–4428, 2019.

LADYMAN, J.; ROSS, D. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

LEE, K. Epidemiology is ecosystem science. Synthese, 2019.

LEWNARD, J; LO, N. Scientific and ethical basis for social-distancing interventions against COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020.

MAUDLIN, T. The metaphysics within physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

RESCHER, N. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. New York: SUNY Press, 1997.

RIEPPEL, O. Species as a Process. Acta Biotheoretica, v. 57 n. 1-2, p. 33–49, 2008.

SIMON, J. Medical Ontology. In: Gifford, F. (Ed.). Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 16: Philosophy of Medicine. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 2011. P. 65–114.

THOMSON-JONES, M. Against Bracketing and Complacency: Metaphysics and the Methodology of the Sciences. In: Slater, M.; Yudell, Z. Metaphysics in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. P. 229–250.

VALLES, S. Philosophy of Biomedicine. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer Edition, 2020. Available in: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/biomedicine/>. Access in: April 16th, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-03

How to Cite

Arroyo, R. W. (2020). Is Coronavirus an object? Metametaphysics meets medical sciences. Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy, 11, e7. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378643633

Issue

Section

Special Ed.: Pandemic and Philosophy (continuous publication)