Life cycle of Brazilian credit unions: the cooperative’s performance as a reason for the discontinuity of operations

Authors

  • Bruno José Canassa Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo
  • Davi Rogério de Moura Costa Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2359043230202

Keywords:

credit unions, discontinuity, financial indicators, cooperative life cycle theory

Abstract

It is possible to observe a recent wave of discontinuity among the Brazilian credit unions. According to the cooperative life cycle theory, the decision to discontinue the activities is determined by the "financial health" of the member and the cooperative itself. Therefore, we aimed in this paper to explore the role of performance in the decision to discontinue the cooperative. To achieve this goal, we found a series of prominent indicators for credit unions and which of these indicators presented statistical differences between the continued and the discontinued. In order to understand if the low performance affected the decision to end the activities, we identified the frequency in which discontinued cooperatives presented performance below the others. The main indicators identified are related to the quality of credit contracts and the generation of resources by the cooperative, being linked to problems encountered in the life cycle phases such as membership growth, the disincentive to investment and management decision-making problems.

Downloads

References

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Atualização mensal de dados. Disponível em: <http://www.bcb.gov.br/?qevsfn201610>. Acesso em 22 ago. 2017.

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Dados selecionados de entidades supervisionadas – IF.data. Disponível em: <https://www3.bcb.gov.br/informes/relatorios>. Acesso em 22 ago. 2017.

BANCO CENTRAL DO BRASIL. Resolução nº 3.859, de 27 de maio de 2010. Altera e consolida as normas relativas à constituição e ao funcionamento de cooperativas de crédito. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 27 maio 2010. Disponível em < http://www.bcb.gov.br/pre/normativos/res/2010/pdf/res_3859_v3_P.pdf>. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2017.

BANERJEE, A.; BESLEY, T.; GUINNANE, T. Thy neighbor’s keeper: the design of a credit cooperative with theory and a test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 109, n. 2, p. 491-515, 1994.

BANERJEE, A.; MOOKHERJEE, D.; MUNSHI, K.; RAY, D. Inequality, control rights, and rent seeking: sugar cooperatives in Maharashtra. Journal of Political Economy, v. 109, n. 1, p. 138-190, 2001.

BARROSO, M. F. G.; BIALOSKORSKI NETO, S. Surplus distribution in San Paulo rural credit cooperatives. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, v. 12, n. 2, p. 290-307, 2010.

BAUER, K. J.; MILES, L. L.; NISHIKAWA, T. The effect of mergers on credit union performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 33, n. 12, p. 2267-2274, 2009.

BEATTY, A.; LIAO, S. Financial accounting in the banking industry: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, v. 58, n. 2, p. 339-383, 2014.

BOONE, C.; ÖZCAN, S. Strategic choices at entry and relative survival advantage of cooperatives versus corporations in the US bio-ethanol industry, 1978-2015. Journal of Management Studies, v. 53, n. 7, p. 1113-1140, 2016.

BRASIL, Lei nº 5.764, de 16 de dezembro de 1971. Define a Política Nacional de Cooperativismo, institui o regime jurídico das sociedades cooperativas, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 16 dez. 1971. Disponível em <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L5764.htm>. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2017.

CARVALHO, F. L.; DIAZ, M. D. M.; BIALOSKORSKI NETO, S.; KALATZIS, A. E. G. Exit and failure of credit unions in Brazil: a risk analysis. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 26, n. 67, p. 70-84, 2015.

COOK, M. L. The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 77, n. 5, p. 1153-1159, 1995.

COOK, M. L.; BURRESS, M. J. A cooperative life cycle framework. Working paper, University of Missouri Department of Agricultural Economics, 2009.

DAOUIA, A.; SIMAR, L.; WILSON, P. W. Measuring firm performance using nonparametric quantile-type distances. Econometric Reviews, v. 36, n. 1-3, p. 156-181, 2017.

FRIED, H. O.; LOVELL, C. A. K.; EECKAUT, P. V. Evaluating the performance of US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 17, n. 2, p. 251-265, 1993.

GODDARD, J.; MCKILLOP, D.; WILSON, J. O. S. U.S. credit unions: survival, consolidation, and growth. Economic Inquiry, v. 52, n. 1, p. 304-319, 2014.

GORTON, G.; SCHMID, F. Corporate governance, ownership dispersion and efficiency: empirical evidence from Austrian cooperative banking. The Journal of Corporate Finance, v. 5, n. 2, p. 119-140, 1999.

HANSMANN, H. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996. 372 p.

HAIR, J. F.; BLACK, W. C.; BABIN, B.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7ª ed. New Jersey: Pearson, 2009. 816 p.

KALOGERAS, N.; PENNINGS, J. M. E.; BENOS, T.; DOUMPOS, M. Which cooperative ownership model performs better? A financial-decision aid approach. Agribusiness, v. 29, n. 1, p. 80-95, 2013.

MATIAS, A. B. Análise Financeira Fundamentalista de Empresas. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009. 392 p.

MURRAY, J. D.; WHITE, R. W. Economies of scale and economies of scope in multiproduct financial institutions: a study of British Columbia credit unions. The Journal of Finance, v. 38, n. 3, p. 887-902, 1983.

PORTER, P. K.; SCULLY, G. W. Economic efficiency in cooperatives. The Journal of Law & Economics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 489-512, 1987.

SHAFFER, J. D. Thinking about farmers’ cooperatives, contracts, and economic coordination. In: ROYER, J. S. (ed.). Cooperative Theory: new approaches. ACS Research Report n. 18. Washington, D.C.: USDA, 1987. p. 61-86.

STAATZ, J. M. The structural characteristics of farmers’ cooperatives and their behavioral consequences. In: ROYER, J. S. (ed.). Cooperative theory: new approaches. ACS Research Report n. 18. Washington, D.C.: USDA, 1987. p. 33-60.

WHEELOCK, D. C.; WILSON, P. W. The evolution of cost-productivity and efficiency among US credit unions. Journal of Banking & Finance, v. 37, n. 1, p. 75-88, 2013.

Published

2018-05-10

How to Cite

Canassa, B. J., & Costa, D. R. de M. (2018). Life cycle of Brazilian credit unions: the cooperative’s performance as a reason for the discontinuity of operations. Revista De Gestão E Organizações Cooperativas, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.5902/2359043230202