FONDO DE COMPENSACIÓN Y EVENTOS EXTREMOS: ASPECTOS INTRODUCTORIOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369434497Palabras clave:
derecho, fondo, eventos extremos, cambio climático.Resumen
El presente artículo se refiere a cuáles serían los valores y criterios de un fondo de compensación como herramienta relevante para el enfrentamiento de las pérdidas y daños derivados de eventos extremos asociados al clima. La investigación fue guiada por una metodología constructivista, complementada por los métodos auxiliares exploratorio y comparado. Las experiencias del derecho comparado en lo que se refiere a los fondos creados para la reparación de desastres antropogénicos son buenas fuentes de observación en relación a los puntos positivos y negativos a ser observados en el momento de la constitución de un fondo de compensación. Individualmente o incluso como parte de una estrategia mayor de capas de gestión de riesgo de desastre, desde que constituido ex ante, y por ley específica, el fondo es una tendencia mundial en la actualidad y puede ser una alternativa para Brasil. Numerosas características lo hacen más eficaz y relativamente menos complejo que otros instrumentos compensatorios como la responsabilidad civil y el seguro.
Descargas
Citas
ACKERMAN, R. The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: An Effective Administrative Response to National Tragedy. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, v. 10, p.135-230, 2005.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de
Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.
Htm. Acesso em: 31 jul. 2017
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. Código de Processo Civil. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm. Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
CERANOWICZ, Amy. Time to Clean up the Confusion: Reeling in the Extension of CERCLA Contribution to Parties Settling State Law Liability. University of Illinois Law Review, v. 2016, p. 589-626, 2016. Disponível em: https://illinoislawreview.org. Acesso em: 10 out. 2017.
CARVALHO, Délton W. de; DAMACENA, Fernanda D. L. Direito dos Desastres. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2013.
DAMACENA, Fernanda D. L. Direito dos Desastres e compensação climática no Brasil: limites e potencialidades. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2019.
DAMACENA, Fernanda D. L. A injustiça por trás do desastre e o papel do direito na redução da vulnerabiliade. In: FERREIRA, Heline Sivini; LEITE José Rubens M. Heline Sivini Ferreira (Org.). Temas Emergentes em Jurisprudência, Ética e Justiça Ambiental no Século XXI. São Paulo : Inst. O direito por um Planeta Verde, 2017. 217 pp.: Il.: (Série Prêmio José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva; v. 2).
FARBER, Daniel A. Basic compensation for victims of climate change. University of Pennsylvania law review, v. 155, n. 1605, p. 1605-1656, 2007.
FARBER, Daniel A. et al. Disaster law and policy. Wolters Kluwer, 2015.
FARRIS, Melissa. Compensating climate change victims: The climate compensation fund as an alternative to tort litigation. Sea Grant Law and Policy Journal, v. 2, n. 2, p.49-62, 2009.
FAURE, Michael; LIU, Jing. The tsunami of March 2011 and the subsequent nuclear incident at Fukushima: Who compensates the victims. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, v. 37, n. 129, p. 129-218, 2012.Disponível em: http://www.wmelpr.org/citations/. Acesso em: 25 mai 2017.
FEINBERG, K. Unconventional Responses to Unique Catastrophes: Tailoring the Law to Meet the Challenges. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, v. 46, n. 3, 525-544, 2014.
FELDMAN, Eric A. Compensating the Victims of Japan's 3-11 Fukushima Disaster. University of Pennsylvania Law School . Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. Faculty Scholarship Paper 1632, p.127-157, 2015.Disponível em:https://www.law.upenn.edu. Acesso em: 25 mai 2017.
FONDEN. Mexico’s Natural Disaster Fund. A Review. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2012.
GREENSPAN, D.; NEUBURGUER, M. Settle or Sue The Use and Structure of Alternative Compensation Programs in the Mass Claims Context. Roger Williams University Law Review, v. 17, n. 1, 97-136, 2012.
HARRIS, James C. Why the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Proves the Case for a New Zealand-Style Comprehensive Social Insurance Plan in the United States. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 100, n 3, p. 1367-148, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.northwesternlawreview.org/issues . Acesso em: 25 mai 2017.
HENSLER, Deborah R. Money talks: Searching for justice through compensation for personal injury and death. DePaul Law Review. v. 53, n.2, p. 417-456, 2003.
HRESKO, T. Restoration and Relief: Procedural Justice and the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Gonzaga Law Review, v.42, n.1, 95-132, 2006.
JAPÃO. Nuclear-Damage-Compensation-Act. Sessão 7. Disponível em: http://japan311disaster.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Japan-Nuclear-Damage-Compensation-Act.pdf. Acesso em: 25 mai 2017.
KINGSTON, Jeff (Ed.). Natural disaster and nuclear crisis in Japan: response and recovery after Japan's 3/11. London: Routledge, 2012.
MALO, Albert Azagra. Daños del amianto: litigación, aseguramiento de riesgos y fondos de compensación. Fundación Mapfre, 2011, p. 27-28. Disponível em: http://fundacionmapfre.com/ccm/content/documentos/fundacion/cs-seguro/libros/danos-del-amianto-N-163.pdf. Acesso em: 18 set. 2017.
MCGOVERN, Francis E. The What and Why of Claims Resolution Facilities. Stanford Law Review, n.57, p. 1361-1389, 2005.
MULLENIX, Linda S. Designing Compensatory Funds: In Search of First Principles. Stanford Journal of Complex Litigation, v.3, p.1-31, 2015. Disponível em: https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-journal-of-complex-litigation-sjcl. Acesso em: 18 set. 2017.
NOLAN, Kenneth P.; O'GRADY, Jeanne M. The Victim Compensation Fund-Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth. DePaul Law Review., v. 53, p. 231-250, 2003.
OSAKA, Eri. Corporate liability, government liability, and the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, v.2, n.3, 2012.
REUBEN, Richard C. Democracy and Dispute Resolution: The Problem of Arbitration. Law and contemporary problems, v. 67, n. 1, p. 279-320, 2004.
RUDA GONZÁLEZ, Albert et al. El daño ecológico puro. La responsabilidad civil por el deterioro del medio ambiente. Girona: Universitat de Girona, 2006.
STEWART, Richard B. Analyzing superfund: Economics, science and law. New York: Routledge, 2016.
THOMAS, TA. Symposium: remedies for big disaster: The BP Gulf Oil Spill and the quest for complete justice. Akron Law Review. v. 45, n. 3, p.567-573, 2012.
USA. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 2014.
USA. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 1980.
USA. Oil Spill Compensation - A Guide to the International Conventions on Liability and Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.itopf.com/knowledge-resources/documents-guides/document/oil-spill-compensation-a-guide-to-the-international-conventions-on-liability-and-compensation-for. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2019.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
