Gestión de los resíduos y desechos sólidos industriales: la coyuntura de los polos zapateros brasileños
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613087643Palabras clave:
Modo de la producción industrial y el consumo, Resíduos y desechos sólidos industriales, Polos de calzado en BrasilResumen
En este estudio se trabajó los conceptos de la Producción, del Consumo y del Modo de Produccióny Consumo Industrial y sus relaciones con el contexto de los residuos y desechos sólidosindustriales en Brasil y pólos brasileños de calzado. Igualmente fue caracterizado estos conceptosy los impactos ambientales de los resíduos y desechos como parte de un mismo fenómeno.También fue verificado que el uso o no de métodos y técnicas de manejo depende de los valoresde la cultura corporativa que prevalecen en el sector. Además, actúa como un factor limitante eneste procedimiento el coste de la logística, la aplicación incipiente del concepto de consorcio deempresas para su tratamiento. En los polos de calzado brasileño se encontró la peligrosidad de susresiduos y desechos es similar a la de otras industrias del país y el concepto de valoración se aplicacon mayor énfasis en el pólo de Birigui (SP), Nova Serrana (MG) y Novo Hamburgo (RS). Este hechoestá probablemente relacionado à los rigores de las leyes locales, la etapa de monitoreo ambiental y la movilización de los interesados en la solución de los problemas sociales, ambientales yeconómicos de estos materiales.
Descargas
Citas
ABICALÇADOS. Pólos produtores. Disponível em: http://www.abicalcados.com.br. Acesso em: 14 out. 2012.
CONAMA – CONSELHO NACIONAL DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Resolução nº 313, de 29 de outubro de 2002. Dispõe sobre o Inventário Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos Industriais. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2002.
FRASSETO, L. L. A indústria de calçados de São João Batista (SC): caracterização do sistema de produção. Disponível em: http://www.cse.ufsc.br. Acesso em: 14 out. 2012.
GALVÃO, O. J. A. Concentração industrial no Brasil segundo os censos 1907-1980. Revista Análise econômica. Ano 9. Nº 15. Março 1991, p. 143-181.
GOMES, C. Antecedentes do capitalismo. Disponível em: http://www.eumed.net. Acesso em: 13 out 2012.
PAIXÃO, J. F; ROMA, J. C.; MOURA, A. M. M. Cadernos de diagnóstico – resíduos sólidos industriais. Brasília: MMA, 2011.
PDACNS - Plano de Desenvolvimento do APL Calçadista de Nova Serrana. Belo Horizonte: SEBRAE/SINDINOVA/IEL, 2007
POCHMANN, M. Economia global e a nova Divisão Internacional do Trabalho. Disponível em: http://decon.edu.uy. Acesso em: 14 out. 2012.
VIEGAS, C. V. Capacidade tecnológica e gestão de resíduos sólidos industriais: estudo de caso em empresas calçadistas do Vale dos Sinos. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração). 113 f. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, UFRS, 1997.
VIEIRA, E. A. A questão ambiental do resíduo/lixo em Ribeirão Preto (SP). Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia). 153f. 2002. Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
