Saber e fazer – uma dialética reflexiva na formação do cidadão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086198Keywords:
School Environment, Citizenship, AwarenessAbstract
This article addresses the issue of life quality in the school environment as an importantcomponent of the citizen building. The survey was conducted in an elementary school in SãoGabriel-RS. Questionnaires were applied covering issues related to physical structure, the idealschool and the student as the protagonist of the school life. From the data collected it began aresearch on the discrepancy between what was answered and how the school reality is. Accordingto the results it seems that the students have the notion of what is right and what is wrong atschool, but some attitudes do not match to what students describe as socially acceptable.
Downloads
References
FICAGNA, Marisa; ORTH, Miguel Alfredo. Educação para um novo cidadão: construindo possibilidades ou relações entre a teoria e a prática. In: ANDREOLA, Balduino Antonio et al. (orgs). Formação de educadores: da itinerância das universidades à escola itinerante. Ijuí: Ed. Unijuí, 2010. p.247-259.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 6. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
______. Pedagogia da esperança: um reencontro com a Pedagogia do Oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2000.
LIBERAL, Edson et al. Escola segura. In: Jornal de Pediatria v.81 n.5. Rio de Janeiro, 2005.
MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza; HARTZ, Zulmira Maria de Araújo; BUSS, Paulo Marchiori. Qualidade de vida e saúde: um debate necessário. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7-18, 2000.
MEC, Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: apresentação dos temas transversais: ética. Brasília, DF: 2000.
PÉREZ, Beatriz et al. Cidadania e participação social: um estudo com crianças no Rio de Janeiro. In: Psicologia & Sociedade v.20 n.2. Porto Alegre, 2008.
PRADEL, Claudia e DÁU, Jorge Alberto. A educação para valores e as políticas públicas educacionais. In: Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Publicas em Educação. v.17 n.64. Rio de Janeiro jul/set. 2009.
RODRIGUES, Nelson. Educação: da formação humana à construção do sujeito ético. In: Educação & Sociedade. v.22 n.76. Campinas out. 2001.
ROSA, Eloisa; GALERA; Joscejy Bassetto. A gestão do espaço físico escolar: um desafio social. Disponível em: http://www.diaadiaeducacao.pr.gov.br/portals/pde/arquivos/1699-8.pdf. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
