Dificuldades de aprendizagem: os desafios da carreira docente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086185Keywords:
Teaching-learning, Interdisciplinary, Pedagogical practice, Teacher, StudentsAbstract
This article studies extracurricular projects developed at a Brazilian Public School name EscolaEstadual Dr Fernando Abbott located in São Gabriel, Rio Grande do Sul State, which had theintention to incorporate the Transversal Subjects, in special, the Cultural Plurality in its EducationalProgram. The available projects were evaluated as well as the interviews done with teachers andthe members of the Principal Office. After doing that we got to the conclusion that almost all theprojects have taken into consideration those Transversal Subjects and that Cultural Plurality wasaccomplished during the realization of the Project called “ConsciênciaNegra” (or BlackConsciousness) about African contribution to Brazilian Culture, including not only Art, History,Food, Religious aspects but also the situation of afro Brazilians into contemporary society. Thispaper has demonstrated how rich and meaningful this subject can be if we use it permanently.
Downloads
References
BIZZO, Nelio. Ciências: fácil ou difícil? São Paulo: Biruta, 2009.
FAZENDA, Ivani. Interdisciplinaridade: definição, projeto, pesquisa. In: FAZENDA, Ivani (Org.). Práticas interdisciplinares na escola. 11. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
FERREIRA, Maria Elisa de M. P. Ciência e interdisciplinaridade. In: FAZENDA, Ivani (Org.). Práticas interdisciplinares na escola. 11. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 39. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
PAVIANI, Jaime. Problemas de Filosofia da Educação. 3. ed. Caxias do Sul, EDUCS, 1986.
PINTO, Álvaro Vieira. Sete lições sobre educação de adultos. 8. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1993.
RAYS, Oswaldo Alonso. Metodologia do ensino: cultura do caminho contextualizado. In: _______ (org.). Educação e Ensino: constatações, inquietações e proposições. Santa Maria: Pallotti, 2000. p. 89-102.
RUIZ, João Álvaro. Metodologia científica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1992. p. 57-63.
SANTOS, Antonio Raimundo dos. Tipos de pesquisa. In: SANTOS, Antonio Raimundo dos. Metodologia científica: a construção do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: DPeA, 1999.
SARTORI, Jerônimo; SEGAT, Taciana Camera. Educação freireana: a formação docente como ato de libertação. In: ANDREOLA, Balduino Antonio et al (orgs.). Formação e educação: da itinerância das universidades à escola itinerante. Ijuí: Editora Unijuí, 2010. p. 111-128.
TAVARES, Dirce Encarnación. Aspectos da história deste livro. In: FAZENDA, Ivani (org.). Práticas interdisciplinares na escola. 11. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
