O Garimpo Bom Futuro como ferramenta para o ensino de química e da educação ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085323Keywords:
Cassiterite, Tin, Tin miningAbstract
Bom Futuro mining is called the largest open pit gold mining in the world, was discovered in 1987and from this discovery began with the digging of its greatest wealth is cassiterite (SnO2), whichcontains about 66% to 75% tin, and is passed through a beneficiation process, which leaves herwith a tin of 99.98% purity. This ore is used in various purposes such as, tin and alloys as solder,brass, pewter alloy and chemical compounds. The tin helped and continues to help the economyof the state of Rondonia, being increasingly used in our day to day, knowing the potential size ofthe study, this paper aims to propose a visit from mining as a tool in teaching environmentaleducation and chemistry, giving a different look to a gold mining and show the great potential of mining as a major laboratory in the open.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais Ensino Médio + Orientações Educacionais Complementares aos Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Ciências da Natureza, Matemática e suas Tecnologias. Ministério da Educação/Secretaria de Educação Básica, Brasília, DF, 2000. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/seb/arquivos/pdf/CienciasNatureza.pdf. Acesso em: 24 abril 2011.
BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Mineração e Transformação Mineral-Sgm, Produto 18 Minério de Estanho, Relatório Técnico 27: perfil da mineração do Estanho. Secretaria de Geologia, 2009.
BRASIL. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral, Informe Mineral Desenvolvimento e Economia Mineral, 2004.
CHASSOT, A. I. Catalisando transformações na educação. Ijuí: UNIJUÍ, 1995.
CUTER, J. C. Formação e Evolução da Indústria de Estanho n Brasil. 2005.f.130, Monografia (Pós – Graduados em Economia Política) – PUC SP, São Paulo, Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.sapientia.pucsp.br/tde_arquivos/10/TDE-2005-09-09T06:03:20Z1172/Publico/Dissertacao.pdf. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2011.
DALL’IGNA LF. E o garimpo de cassiterita em Rondônia. Revista da CPRM,1996. 1: 56–61.
DARLENE, M. A. e SCHOBBENHAUS, C. Metalogênese do Brasil, (Distrito Bom Futuro), pag. 103, Editora Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2001.
DEPARTAMENTO NACIONAL DE PRODUÇÃO MINERAL (DNPM). Estanho.1994. Disponível em: http://www.dprn.gov.br. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2011.
FILGUEIRAS, C. A. L.. A nova química do estanho. Quím. Nova [online]. 1998, vol.21, n.2, pp. 176-192. ISSN 0100-4042.
HANAN, S.A. Panorama da Mineração e Metalurgia do Estanho no Brasil e no Mundo: subsídios para a elaboração da política setorial do país. Rio de Janeiro: SNIEE, 1983.
IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Banco de dados Cidades.2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/topwindow.htm?1. Acesso em: 25/06/2011.
LONGO, R. M.; RIBEIRO, A. I. ; MELO, W. J. Caracterização física e química de áreas mineradas pela extração de cassiterita. Rev. Bragantia, v. 64, n.1, p. 101-107, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/brag/v64n1/23857.pdf. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2011.
MACHADO, I. F. Recursos minerais: política e sociedade. São Paulo: Edgard Blucher Ltda., 1989.
PORSANI, J. L.; MENDONÇA, C. A.; BETTENCOURT, J. S.; HIODO, F. Y.; VIAN, J. A. J.; SILVA, J. E. Investigações GPR nos distritos mineiros de Santa Bárbara e Bom Futuro: Província Estanífera de Rondônia. Rev. Bras. Geof. , v. 22, n.1, p. 57-68, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbg/v22n1/a05v22n1.pdf. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2011.
PREFEITURA. Municipal de Ariquemes. Localização de Ariquemes. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.ariquemes.ro.gov.br/default.asp?secao=conteudo.asp&tb=pt_ariquemes&tit=Localização&cp=localizacao. Acesso em: 19/07/2011.
RAMOS, C. R. Estanho na Amazônia: o apogeu e ocaso da produção. Novos Cadernos NAEA, v. 6, n. 2, p. 39-60, dez., 2003. Disponível em: http://www.periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/87/138. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2011.
RODRIGUES, A. F. S. Estanho, Bem Mineral, Balanço Mineral Brasileiro, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.dnpm.gov.br/portal/assets/galeriaDocumento/BalancoMineral2001/estanho.pdf. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2011.
RONALTTI, I. Uma perspectiva histórica e ambiental acerca dos garimpos de Rondônia. 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
