Contaminação do meio ambiente pelo descarte inadequado de medicamentos vencidos ou não utilizados
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084627Keywords:
Environmental education, Soil, Water, Discard, DrugsAbstract
Can be notice that the destruction of natural resources start to have a exponential scalestarting from the Industrial Revolution. The human intervention is responsible by emission ofdifferent pollutants as the inadequate discard drugs. So this study had for objective show that byhabits changes we can favor the environment. For this we need be discard de expire or not usedrugs in adequate places without cause risks for the environment favoring the population healthand welfare. For this study were realized bibliographic research’s in primary and secondarysources for obtain one lifting about the destination of discard drugs. The field research wasrealized with one sample of 50 basics students families belonging to the scholar community of theDom Pedro II Basic Education School, Agudo, RS, Brazil. For the data collecting was utilized ainterview with semi-structured questions. For the results analyze and discussion organized liftingand graphics. In front the results obtained by the research about discard drugs can conclude thatlarger part of population discard inadequately the drugs because don’t know about the harms thatthis drugs cause for the environment and too because don’t have a adequate place for drugsdiscard.
Downloads
References
ALVARENGA, L.S.V./ NICOLETTI, M.A. Descarte Doméstico de Medicamentos e algumas considerações sobre o Impacto Ambiental. Revista Saúde, 2010.
ANVISA. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Disponível em: http://www.anvisa. gov.br/medicamentos/glossario/glossario_p.htm. Acesso em: 8 de outubro de 2011.
BIDONE, Francisco Antonio. Resíduos Sólidos Provenientes de Coletas Especiais: Eliminação e Valorização. Disponível em: http://www.finep.gov.br/prosab/livros/ prosabbidonefinal.pdf. Acesso em 1 de outubro de 2011.
CARVALHO, Maria Cecília M. de. (org). Construindo o saber: metodologia científica, fundamentos e técnicas. São Paulo: Papirus, 1991.
FERREIRA, J. A. Resíduos sólidos e lixo hospitalar: Uma discussão ética. Cad.Saúde Públ. v.11 n.2, Rio de Janeiro, abr./jun. 2005.
GASPARINI, J.C.; GASPARINI, A. R.; FRIGIERI, M.C. Estudo do descarte de medicamentos e consciência ambiental no município de Catanduva-SP. Disponível em: http://www.fatecjab.edu.br/revista/2011_v02_n01/4_gasparini.pdf . Acesso em 13 de outubro de 2011.
LAPORTE, Joan-Ramon. Para Melhor Uso de Medicamentos - Disponível em:http://www.tapsorg.br/Paginas/medmedic04.html. Acesso em 15 de novembro de 2011.
LEFF, Enrique. Racionalidade Ambiental - a reapropriação social da natureza. Civilização Brasileira,
NASCIMENTO, Carlos Eduardo. Descarte de Remédios: uma questão muito grave. Disponível
em: http://planetasustentavel. abril.com.br/noticia/lixo/conteudo_296191.shtml. Acesso em 15 de outubro de 2011.
RODRIGUES, Carla R. B. Aspectos Legais e Ambientais do Descarte de Resíduos de Medicamentos.
Disponível em: http:// www.pg.utfpr.edu.br/dirppg/ppgep/dissertacoes/arquivos/121/Dissertacao.pdf. Acesso em 22 de setembro de 2011.
SACRAMENTO, Weverton Pereira do. Metodologia da Pesquisa Científica. Ouro Preto, MG:UFOP, 2008.
SILVA, Evelyn Ribeiro. Problematizando o Descarte de Medicamentos Vencidos: para onde destinar? Disponível em: http://www.epsjv.fiocruz.br/beb/Monografias2005/evelyn.pdf. Acesso em: 1 de outubro de 2011.
SILVESTRI, Cezar. Destinação Final dos Medicamentos Vencidos. Disponível em: http://www.al.rs.gov.br/download/ComEspMedicamentosVencidos/Relat%C3%B3rioFinal.pdf. Acesso em: 18 de outubro de 2010.
SOTORIVA, Patricia. Descarte Incorreto de Medicamentos Ameaça o meio Ambiente. Disponível em: http://www.medicsupply.com.br/pacientes/blog/descarte-incorreto-de-medicamentosameaca-meio-ambiente/. Acesso em: 16 de outubro de 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
