Solid waste management in Escola do Campo: experience of environmental education at EMCEF of São Gabriel/RS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843415

Keywords:

Waste Management, Environmental Education, Rural Education, Field School

Abstract

This text consists of the final work of the Specialization Course in Education: Interdisciplinary Teaching Practices (EDUINTER) of the Federal University of Pampa - São Gabriel Campus / RS. This article aims to make a diagnosis of knowledge about waste management and environmental education to the members of the school community of EMCEF Baltazar Teixeira da Silveira, located in the Cerro do Ouro District - São Gabriel / RS. The institution has 55 students enrolled, from kindergarten (preschool) to elementary school (1st to 9th grade), and 17 servants (including teachers and staff). The emphasis of the study refers to identifying the main waste produced in the school and the forms of disposal carried out by the school community, in which it was identified that the organic waste is placed in the existing compost at the school and that solid waste has two paths: 1- discarded in a hole and incinerated; and 2 - defined as recyclable, driven to the city by school bus. Data collection was performed by applying a questionnaire to teachers and students. After this diagnosis, environmental awareness actions and proposals for the collection of solid waste were performed, highlighting the importance of Environmental Education and the need for application. theoretical knowledge in daily school and family actions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

André Carlos Cruz Copetti, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Professor adjunto do Campus São Gabriel, da Universidade Federal do Pampa/UNIPAMPA.

Fabiana Nunes Barcellos, Secretaria Municipal de Educação de São Gabriel, São Gabriel, RS

Graduada em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade da Região da Campanha.

Eduardo Pastorio, Secretaria Municipal de Educação de São Gabriel, São Gabriel, RS

Doutorando em Educação em Ciência pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Especialista em Gestão Educacional pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Especialização em andamento em Educação do Campo pela Faculdade São Braz.

References

ASSOACIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 10.004. Resíduos Sólidos: Classificação. 2. Ed. Rio de Janeiro, 2004.

BRASIL. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília: MEC, 2017.

BRASIL. Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais Gerais para a Educação Básica. Resolução CNE/CEB n° 4 de 13 de julho de 2010. Ministérios da Educação. Brasília: MEC, 2010.

BRASIL. Diretrizes Operacionais para a Educação Básica nas Escolas do Campo. Resolução CNE/CEB nº 1 de 03 de abril de 2002. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Continuada, Alfabetização e Diversidade (SECAD). Brasília: MEC, 2002.

BRASIL. Dispõe sobre a política de educação do campo e o Programa Nacional de Educação na Reforma Agrária (PRONERA). Decreto nº 7.352, de 4 de novembro de 2010. Brasília: MEC, 2010.

BRASIL. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases (LDB). Lei nº 9.394/96. Brasília: MEC, 1996.

BRASIL. Lei nº 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos e dá outras providências. Brasília, 2010.

BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. Governo Federal. Base Nacional Curricular Comum, acessado em 25/11/2019.

BRASIL. Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental. Lei nº 9.795/99.

Brasília: MMA, 1999.

BRASIL. Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Lei nº 6.938/81. Brasília: MMA, 1981.

BUENO, S. Minidicionário da Língua Portuguesa. Ed. rev. e atual. São Paulo, 2001.

Decreto Executivo nº 057 de 28 de agosto de 2018, São Gabriel- RS.

DIAS, M. F. S. Caracterização física dos resíduos sólidos urbanos: uma etapa preliminar no gerenciamento do lixo. XVIII Congresso Internacional de Inginiéria Sanitaria y Ambiental. Cancún, México, 2002.

GOUVEIA, Nelson. Resíduos sólidos urbanos: impactos socioambientais e perspectiva de manejo sustentável com inclusão social. Ciênc. saúde coletiva, Rio de Janeiro , v. 17, n. 6, jun. 2012 . Disponível em: . Acesso em: 03 de julho de 2015.

KOLLING, Edgar Jorge, MOLINA, Mônica Castagna (Orgs.) Por uma Educação Básica do Campo: memória. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 1999. (Coleção por uma Educação Básica do Campo, nº1).

MONTEIRO, José H. P. et al. Manual Integrado de Gerenciamento de Resíduos Sólidos. Rio de Janeiro. IBAM, 2001.

MORAES, M.C Pensamento Eco-sistêmico: educação aprendizagem e cidadania no século XXI. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004, 342 p.

PASTORIO, Eduardo. A Educação do Campo na Secretaria Municipal de Educação: o caso do município de São Gabriel/RS (Especialização em Gestão Educacional) – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2018.

PINHÃO, Francine; MARTINS, Isabel. Diferentes abordagens sobre o tema saúde e ambiente: desafios para o ensino de ciências. Ciênc. educ. (Bauru), Bauru , v. 18, n. 4, 2012 . Disponível em https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/ciedu-scielo. Acesso em: 03 de julho de 2015.

RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Referencial Curricular Gaúcho. Porto Alegre: CEED, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-25

How to Cite

Copetti, A. C. C., Barcellos, F. N., & Pastorio, E. (2020). Solid waste management in Escola do Campo: experience of environmental education at EMCEF of São Gabriel/RS. Monografias Ambientais, 19, e9. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843415

Issue

REMOA, V. 19, 2020, EDIÇÃO ESPECIAL: PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO - EDUINTER - UNIPAMPA

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.