O técnico agrícola e a educação ambiental: concepções de meio ambiente e práticas pedagógicas de professores formadores destes profissionais

Authors

  • Leila Cristina Aoyama Barbosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083831

Keywords:

Professional education, Environmental education, Technical education, Conceptions, Environmental perception

Abstract

The agricultural technician is a professional who has direct contact with the environment and investigate how this professional formation occurs is task necessary to understand how the world of work comes conceiving the relation x environmental education society. This work is a part of a research that examines the articulation of environmental education in a course curriculum in Technical Agriculture. At this stage, we bring the results obtained in semi-structured interviews with teachers of the course concerned. The objective was to investigate the conceptions of environment and environmental education of teachers, as well as understand their pedagogical practices. From dialogues with the teachers was possible to diagnose that prevails among them a conception of environmental non-anthropocentric, utilitarian and yet an understanding of environmental education as a process of awareness and awareness of people, targeting only practices conservationists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. 3. ed. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.

BRASIL. Parecer da Câmara de Educação Básica (CEB) n° 16, de 25 de novembro de 1999. Poder executivo. Trata das Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para a Educação Profissional de Nível Técnico. Brasília, 1999.

BURNIER, S.; CRUZ, R. M. R.; DURÃES, M. N.; PAZ, M. L.; SILVA, A. N.; SILVA, I. M. M. Historias de vida de professores: o caso da educação profissional. Revista Brasileira de Educação, Campinas, v. 12, n. 35, p. 343-358, mai./ago., 2007. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbedu/v12n35/a13v1235.pdf. Acesso em: 27 set. 2010.

DIAS, G. F. Educação ambiental: princípios e práticas. 8. ed. São Paulo: Gaia, 2000.

FREIRE, P. Pedagogia do oprimido. 47. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2005.

FRIGOTTO, G.; CIAVATTA, M.; RAMOS, M. A política de educação profissional no governo Lula: um percurso histórico

controvertido. Educ. Soc. [online]. Campinas, v. 26, n.92, p. 1087-1113, out. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/es/v26n92/v26n92a17.pdf. Acesso em: 24 mai. 2010.

FERNANDES J. M. A. B. Educação ambiental: representações dos jovens e professores face ao ambiente. Lisboa, Portugal, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2008. (dissertação).

GRÜN, M. Descartes e a amnésia moderna : algumas consequências para a educação ambiental. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA ANPED, 29., 2006, Caxambu/MG. Disponível em: http://www.anped.org.br/reunioes/29ra/trabalhos/trabalho/GT22-1863--Int.pdf. Acesso em: 15 out. 2010.

LOUREIRO, C. F. L. Educação ambiental transformadora. In: LAYRARGUES, P. P. (Org.). Identidades da educação ambiental brasileira. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, p. 65-84, 2004.

LÜDKE, M.; ANDRÉ, M. E. D. A. Pesquisa em educação: abordagens qualitativas. EPU: São Paulo, 1986.

MENEZES, L. C. de (Org.). Formação continuada de professores de ciências no contexto ibero-americano. Campinas: NUPES, 1996.

REIGOTA, M. Meio ambiente e representação social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.

_____. O que é educação ambiental?. 2. ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1994. (col. Primeiros Passos).

SAUVÉ, L. Educação ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável: uma análise complexa. Revista de educação pública, Cuiabá, v. 6, n. 10, p. 72-103, dez. 1997. Disponível em: http://www.ufmt.br/revista/arquivo/rev10/educacao_ambiental_e_ desenvolvim.html. Acesso em: 05 nov. 2009.

SCHNORR, G. M. Pedagogia do oprimido. SOUZA, A. I. (Org.). Paulo Freire: vida e obra. São Paulo: Expressão Popular,

p. 69-100, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2011-10-11

How to Cite

Barbosa, L. C. A. (2011). O técnico agrícola e a educação ambiental: concepções de meio ambiente e práticas pedagógicas de professores formadores destes profissionais. Monografias Ambientais, 4(4), 887–902. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083831

Issue

REMOA, V. 4, N. 4, OUT., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.