Ethnoeducational Workshop: an interdisciplinary proposal for socio-environmental awareness in the coastal area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130836981Keywords:
Environmental education, Traditional knowledge, Nature and Society, Arembepe, CordelAbstract
The term Ethno means how local groups see the world. The present article aims to present the outcome proposed by the environmental education workshop entitled EthoeducAtiva, as a strategy for environmental education and acknowledgement of the traditional local community. The first stage of the study, which had an ethnobiological character, was held from March to June 2017, by applying thirty-one semi-structured interviews with the fishermen and shellfisheries of Arembepe. For the data analysis it was used the content analysis, which allowed the data interpretation. With the partial result of the research, it was held an experimental workshop with students of the eighth grade of a high school, which was within the study area designated EthoeducAtiva - stage II. Initially, the workshop developed through an interdisciplinary proposal between the school subjects of natural sciences and Portuguese language. As a result of the reflection upon the data found in the interviews, a Cordel text was produced. The EthoeducAtiva workshop allowed the association of traditional knowledge with the educational training of students in formal educational spaces. Strategies that encourage the elaboration of Cordeis or any other product should be stimulated, particularly in countries which have such a diverse natural and cultural heritage as Brazil. In that regard, it is aimed the development of the know how to take care of the environment and the valorization of traditional communities at the local level, with reflections and actions for social and environmental issues in a global perspective.
Downloads
References
ACIOLI A.S. Literatura popular como ferramenta para a educação ambiental. Revista brasileira de educação ambiental.2010:v.5:76-83.
ALBUQUERQUE U.P, ALVES G.C.A. O que é etnobiologia? In: ALBUQUERQUE, U.P. Introdução à Etnobiologia. Recife: NUPPEA;2014.17-22.
ANDREOLI V.M, ANACLETO A. Compartilhando saberes: os conhecimentos tradicionais e a educação ambiental. In: Encontro Paranaense de Educação Ambiental - EPEA, IX.2006:s.p.
BARDIN L. Análise de Conteúdo. Presses Universitaires de France:1977.
BEGOSSI A. Áreas, pontos de pesca, pesqueiros e territórios na pesca artesanal. In: BEGOSSI, A. (Org). Ecologia de pescadores da Mata Atlântica e da Amazônia. São Paulo: HUCITEC, NEPAM/UNICAMP/NUPAUB/USP – Fabesp ; 2004. p. 223-253.
BOFF L. Saber cuidar. 20.ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2014.
CLAUZET M, RAMIRES, M, BEGOSSI, A. Etnoictiologia dos pescadores artesanais da praia de Guaibim, Valença, BA, Brasil.- Neotropical Biology and Conservation.2007:136-154.
EVANGELISTA-BARRETO N.S. et al. Indicadores socioeconômicos e percepção ambiental de pescadores em São Francisco do Conde, Bahia. Bol. Inst. Pesca. 2014:459-470.
HANAZAKI N. Etnoecologia, etnobiologia e as interfaces entre o conhecimento científico e o conhecimento local. In: Anais da Reunião Anual da SBPC [Internet]; 2006 julho; Florianopolis, Brasil [cited 2019 fev 15]: < http://www.sbpcnet.org.br/livro/58ra/atividades/TEXTOS/texto_290.html. KOTTAK C.P. Assault on Paradise: Social Change in a Brazilian Village. USA. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1999.
MARCONDES M. E. R. Proposições metodológicas para o ensino de química: oficinas temáticas para a aprendizagem da ciência e o desenvolvimento da cidadania. EM EXTENSÃO.2008; V. 7:67-77.
MARTIN G. J. Etnobotany, a methods manual. Earthscan London; 2004.
MEDINA N.M. Educar – uma perspectiva humanística. Congresso Internacional de Educação do Colégio Coração de Jesus; 1998 Junho; Florianópolis;2000
MEIRELES M.P.A, MEIRELES, V.J.S, VIEIRA, L.S,. BARROS R.F.M. Características da pesca artesanal realizada na comunidade Passarinho/ Ilha das Canárias/MA. Gaia Scientia.2017;12-26.
MOURÃO J. S, MONTENEGRO, S. C. S. Pescadores e Peixes: o conhecimento local e o uso da taxonomia folk baseado no modelo berlineano. vol. 2, Recife: NUPPEA; 2010.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, S, SATO, M. Educação Ambiental e Etnoconhecimento: parceiras para a conservação da diversidade de aves pantaneiras. Ambiente e Educação.2006. V. 11: 125-137.
PEREIRA, B. E, DIEGUES, A. C. Conhecimento de populações tradicionais como possibilidade de conservação da natureza: uma reflexão sobre a perspectiva da etnoconservação. Desenvolvimento e Meio ambiente.2010: 37-50
.
PROJETO TAMAR [Internet]. Arembepe–Ba. Brasil.[cited 2019 feb 15] < http://www.tamar.org.br/centros_visitantes.php?cod=2>.
RIBEIRO A.S, ROSA R.R.G, BUSSOLETTI D.M, HAERTER L. A água como destino: na colônia de pescadores Z-3, territórios e territorialidades entre mar e terra. Revista memória em rede.2018;v.10:2177-4129.
TAMAIO I, LAYRARGUES P. P. Quando o parque (ainda) não é nosso: educação ambiental, pertencimento e participação social no Parque Sucupira, Planaltina (DF). Espaço & Geografia.2014:V.17: 145-182.
TOLEDO V. M, BARREREA-BASSOLS N. A etnoecologia: uma ciência pós-normal que estuda as sabedorias tradicionais. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente.2009: 31-45.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
