Urban morphology and land irregularity: an approach in semi-arid northeast
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130821327Keywords:
Urban planning, Reformulation of cities, Land regularizationAbstract
The urban growth disordered due to lack of planning and structuring of geographical space gives rise to the outskirts of the training process and improper occupation of settlements. Brazilian cities are marked by social inequality: while some live in highly privileged places, others reside in neighborhoods with housing and sanitation decadent. The purpose of this article is to describe the problems of growth and unplanned urban settlements in Brazil and the situation of five cities in the semiarid potiguar land irregularity. The housing reality of Brazilian cities was studied, observing the conflicts between occupational areas that were planned and those that formed improperly and analyzed five municipalities of the semiarid northeast, specifically in the category land regularization. It appears that there is a division of the urban space of Brazil in regions with excellent infrastructure available to its occupants and local with the absence of minimum conditions of dignity, and a high dominial irregularity index. However, you can do an urban restructuring through programs aimed at land tenure and the consequent redesign of cities.Downloads
References
Barros, F. M. P. (2014). Regularização Fundiária & Direito à Moradia: Instrumentos Jurídicos e o Papel dos Municípios. Curitiba: Juruá.
Brasil (1988, 05 de outubro). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União.
______ (2009, 07 de julho). Lei 11.977, de 07 de julho de 2009. Dispõe sobre o Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida – PMCMV e a regularização fundiária de assentamentos localizados em áreas urbanas; altera o Decreto-Lei no 3.365, de 21 de junho de 1941, as Leis nos 4.380, de 21 de agosto de 1964, 6.015, de 31 de dezembro de 1973, 8.036, de 11 de maio de 1990, e 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001, e a Medida Provisória no 2.197-43, de 24 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União
Fundação Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas – FIPE. (2014). Índice FIPEZAP de Preços de Imóveis Anunciados. Disponível em: http://www.fipe.org.br/web/indices/fipezap/reseases/%C3%8Dndice%20FipeZAP%20-
%20Divulga%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20201411.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2015.
Gil, A. C. (2002). Como Elaborar um Projeto de Pesquisa. 4. Ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. (2011). Vamos conhecer o Brasil. Disponível em: http://7a12.ibge.gov.br/vamos-conhecer-o-brasil/nosso-povo/caracteristicas-da-populacao. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2015.
_________(2011). Sinopse do censo demográfico 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/imprensa/ppts/00000015164811202013480105748802.pdf. Acesso em: 11 jun. 2015.
_________(2011). Aglomerados subnormais Informações Territoriais. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/imprensa/ppts/00000015164811202013480105748802.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2015.
Maricato, E., Vainer, C., Harvey, D., Brito, F., Peschanski, J. A., Maior, J. L. S., Sakamoto, L., Secco, L., Iasi, M. S., Ninja, M., Davis, M., Movimento Passe Livre, Oliveira, P. R., Rolnik, R., Braga, R., Viana, S., Žižek, S., Lima, V. A. (2013). Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram conta do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.
Ministério das Cidades. (2009). Regularização Fundiária Urbana no Brasil. Brasília.
Sindicato da Habitação – SECOVIRIO. (2014). Metro Quadrado da orla de Icaraí tem valor menor que a média de todo Rio. Disponível em: http://www.secovirio.com.br/Noticias/Noticias/Metro-quadradoda-orla-de-Icarai-tem-valor-menor-do-que-a-media-de-todo-o-Rio-9094.html. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2015.
Vergara, S. C. (2004). Projetos e Relatórios de Pesquisa em Administração. São Paulo: Atlas S. A.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
