Analysis and awareness among students of a public school about Environmental Education actions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820635Keywords:
Environmental education, School, Waste, CitizenshipAbstract
This paper presents the perceived aspects during an action occurred in a State High School about questions related to environmental education and the problem of waste. The research group chosen was Curso Normal, because it’s based on teachers training, and they are often multipliers of good practices of actions referred to the chosen theme. The teachers training, aware of environmental education, tries to fulfill the current needs of society, where an educator besides the teaching activities, becomes an example to be followed, in the community where he/she is located, it’s one of the essential instruments to take environmental actions at the school where the Curso Normal professionals will work. Therefore, the exploration activities were previously developed as questionnaires and conversation circles.
Downloads
References
BRASIL, Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental. Lei 9795/99. Brasília, 1999.BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente - CONAMA. Resolução Nº 275. 2001.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: introdução aos parâmetros curriculares nacionais. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília, DF. MEC/SEF, 1997.
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. Educação ambiental: princípios e práticas. 9º Ed. São Paulo: Gaia, 2004. FAZENDA, Ivani (Org.). Práticas Interdisciplinares na Escola. 10ªed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2005.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 39. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1996.
GODINHO, E. M. S. O. A Educação Ambiental como parceira no tratamento de resíduos sólidos. NUPEAT–IESA–UFG, v.3, n.1, Jan./Jun., 2013, p. 78–93, ISSN 2237-079X.
JACOBI,P. Educação Ambiental , Cidadania e Sustentabildade. Cadernos de Pesquisa, n. 118, março/ 2003 Cadernos de Pesquisa, n. 118, p. 189-205, março/ 2003. Encontrado em http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cp/n118/16834.pdf
LEFF, E. Epistemologia ambiental. São Paulo: Cortez, 2001.
MARENGO, J.A. - Mudanças climáticas, condições meteorológicas extremas e eventos climáticos no Brasil. Disponível em:http://www.fbds.org.br/fbds/IMG/pdf/doc-504.pdf. Acessado em 29 de agosto de 2015.
MUNIZ, Agnaldo da Costa. Projeto Apoema. Encontrado em http:// www.apoema.com.br /geral.htm. Acessado em 25 de junho de 2015.
PEDRINI, A. de G. Educação Ambiental: reflexões e práticas contemporâneas. RJ: Vozes, 1997.
SILVA, T. C. L. da, ROZA-GOMES, M.F., OLIVEIRA A.D. de. Educação ambiental: um relato de atividades com embasamento científico. Unoesc & Ciência - ACBS, Joaçaba, v. 1, n. 2, p. 125-134, jul. /dez. 2010. Encontrado em: editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/acbs/article/download/583/pdf_84. Acesso em 16/08/15.
SIRANGELO, F. R. Relação entre a ocorrência de inundações e enxurradas e os índices morfométricos das sub-bacias hidrográficas da Região Hidrográfica do Guaíba, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Dissertação de Mestrado. UFRGS. Encontrado em :http://www.ufrgs.br/srm/ ppgsr/ publicacoes/ dissert_fabiana_sirangelo.pdf. Acessado em 29 de agosto de 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
