The relevance of water theme in teaching science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820451Keywords:
Water resources, Sensitization, ReuseAbstract
A non-renewable water well, was the theme chosen to work at the School Senator Filinto Muller, the Irenópolis district in the city of Juscimeira-MT, in order to sensitize students about drinking water waste occurring in the community where they live; and from the redefinition of knowledge of students, achieve reach families in their homes. Initially, it was discussed water waste and involved students in a practical activity on the possible incorrect uses in the community. During the exhibition of the activity results were encompassed several issues relevant to the theme, such as: hydrological cycle, pollution, potability and the importance of water. Its persisting doubts were worked into a lecture using multimedia feature with pictures and videos. Data on the construction of knowledge were collected from application of two questionnaires. With support on data collected through questionnaires I and II, we note that initially students were unaware of the potability of water, waste contained in their homes, in the community and even the importance that water has in everyone's life. From the activities carried out it was found changes of students, both on survey responses and in argument on the subject.Downloads
References
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS, A Evolução da Gestão dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. Brasília: ANA, 2002.
ALCANTARA, Vania./ Inserção Curricular da Educação Ambiental./ Vania Alcantara.-Curitiba: IESDE Brasil S.A., 2009. 108p.
AZEVEDO, Eduardo Bessa, Ambiente & Sociedade – Vol. VI nº. 2 jul./dez. 2003
AZEVEDO, E B Poluição VS. Tratamento de água: duas faces de uma mesma moeda, Química Nova na Escola, n. 10, p.21-25,1999
BAIRD, C. Química Ambiental. 2ªed.trad. M.A.L. Recio e L.C.M Carrera Porto Alegre: Bookman,2002.
PEDRINI,A.G.Educação Ambiental: Reflexões e Práticas Contemporâneas. São Paulo, Ed. Vozes. 2008
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa / Paulo Freire, São Paulo, Paz Terra, 2011.
FUNDAÇÃO NACIONAL DA SAÚDE, Manual de Saneamento. 3a ed. Brasília: MS/ FNS, 1998.
LAKATOS, Eva Maria. Fundamentos de metodologia cientifica/ Maria de Andrade Marconi, Eva Lakatos.-7.ed.-São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
MACHADO, P. A. L., Direito Ambiental Brasileiro, 9a ed., rev., atual. e ampl., 2a tiragem, São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2001.
MATO GROSSO. Leis Política Estadual de Recursos Hídricos: Lei nº 6.945, Decreto nº 1291/2000 e portaria 02/2000. Cuiabá: Fundação dp Meio Ambiente, 2002. 36p.
NULTSCH, WILHEM. Botânica Geral; trad. Paulo Luiz de Oliveira- 10 ed. Revisada e autorizada- Porto Alegre: Artmed,2000. pacto.mec.gov.br/materiais acessada em 03/08/13 às 14:17.
REBOUÇAS, A.C. Água no Brasil: abundância, desperdício e escassez. Bahia Análise e Dados, Salvador, V.13, n. Especial, p.341-345.2003.
PHILIPPI JR, Arlindo. Saneamento, saúde e ambiente: fundamentos para um desenvolvimento sustentável /, SP: Manole, 2005.-(Coleção Ambiental; 2)
SELBORNE, LORD. A Ética do Uso da Água Doce: um levantamento. Brasília: 2010.
SPIRO, Thomas G.Quimíca Ambiental/Thomas G.Spiro, Willam M. Stigliane; tradução. Sonia Midori Yamamoto; revisão técnica Reinaldo C. Basito, Renato S. Freire.-2.ed.-São Paulo: Parson Prentice.Hall, 2009.
VAITSMAM, Enilce Pereira Enilce Pereira Vaistman, Delmo Santiago Vaitsman.- Quimíca & meio ambiente: ensino contextualizado/ Rio de Janeiro: Interciências, 2006.-(interdisciplinar;4)
WATSON, Robert T. et al. Protecting our Planet, Securing Our Future: Linkages among global environmental issues and huma needs, publicação do PNUMA – Programa das Nações Unidas para o Meio Ambiente, Banco Mundial/Nasa, novembro de 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
