Brochures as didactic material in the EJA: a transdisciplinar proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820438Keywords:
Rack, Teaching-learning process, EJA, TransdisciplinarityAbstract
Present analysis and reporting of the implementation of a common instrument, popularly known as Rack used as a resource in the teaching and learning as a guiding transdisciplinary proposal for students and teachers prior to the EJA. Being presented as a methodology referred to as character pedagogical intervention performed in the State School Antonio José de Lima. The objective was to evaluate the possibility of participatory planning, respecting the Pedagogical plans Teaching Teachers Political Project of the institution. Was based on authors who researched and documents such as the PPP, NCPs; Sought to present and conceptualize what is being disciplinarity these topics that bring much doubts and misunderstandings of concepts and even some anxiety on the part of teachers and the whole school community. Although the proposal has been received and as a challenge for the whole team, and after meetings, studies, planning and posteriori applicability, it can be said that the result met expectations given that those involved found that the experience gave them analyze the possibility of a new pedagogical proposal happen.Downloads
References
ANTONIO, S. Educação e transdisciplinaridade: a necessidade de uma nova escuta poética, Editora Lucerna, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, 2002.
BEHRENS, M. A. Paradigma da Complexidade: Metodologia de Projeto, Contratos e Portfólios. 2.ed. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2008.
BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Ciências Naturais. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1997.
FREIRE, P. Pedagogia da Autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. Editora Paz e Terra, São Paulo-SP, 1996 (Coleção Leitura).
GALDINO M. Transdisciplinaridade na revista Nova Escola, muito bom viu! Disponível em: http://xuxugaldino.blogspot.com.br/2008/05/transdisciplinaridade-na-revista-nova.html. Acesso em: 17 ago. 2014.
LOPES S.P. ; Sousa L.S.EJA: uma educação possível ou mera utopia? São Paulo: Disponível em: .<http://www.cerEJA.org.br/pdf/revista_v/revista_selvaplopes.pdf> Acesso em: 22 jul. 2014.
MOURA, D. H.; Baracho, M. G. (orgs). Natal: IFRN Editora, 2010. P. 13-36.
NICOLESCU, B. Manifesto da Transdisciplinaridade. São Paulo: Trion, 1999, 167p.
NICOLESCU, B. Projeto Político Pedagógico, 2010, Escola Estadual de 1º Grau Antônio José de Lima.
REVISTA PRÁXIS, ano IV, nº 8 – agosto, 2012.
SANTOS A. O que é transdisciplinaridade. Disponível em: http://www.ufrrj.br/leptrans/arquivos/O_QUE_e_TRANSDISCIPLINARIDADE.pdf. Acesso em: 16 ago. 2014.
SILVA, M.M. A. de; Henrique, A. L. S. Concepções de professores sobre os desafios da docência no PROEJA no IFRN: práticas pedagógicas e formação docente.
WEIL, P; et al. Rumo à nova transdisciplinaridade: sistemas abertos de conhecimento. Editora Summus, São Paulo-SP, 1993.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
