Analysis of solid waste management in Panambi-RS: 1955 to 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818736Keywords:
Solid waste, Legislation, Management, City public administratorAbstract
The general objective of this research consisted in conducting a historical and geographical review on the solid waste management from 1955 to 2012. The study was conducted using the qualitative research, where it was possible to reflect, analyze and position on the actions of the public officials. Over the city public administrations from 1955 to 2012, there were seven administrators whereas three of them managed only one term, two managed for two terms and two managed for three terms. Panambi city had three places where they held the solid waste disposal. From the theoretical framework and search through the field research it was possible to carry out the analysis where we realized that each administrator had their own concept of solid waste management and administration. There were a consortium, outsourcing and ultimately the services have been carried out by city employees. At the first place of study, it was found that the city government only offered the services of collection and the waste was taken to an area far from the urban center, it was literally a big rubbish dump. The concern was keeping the waste away from the city center. The second place showed an evolution in the management of services, it had changed from a rubbish dump to a recycling plant with a controlled landfill and at the third place they started with a recycling plant and sorting with a controlled landfill and after they invested in the construction of a sanitary landfill. Panambi has excelled in the region of AMUPLAM, which is part of the way to perform the management of solid waste, although much progress is needed for it to be considered a model.Downloads
References
ABRELPE-Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Limpeza Pública e Resíduos Especiais, Situação dos Municípios em Relação ao Recolhimento do Lixo de 2009 a 2011, Disponível em:http://www.abrelpe.org.br/. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2012.
ALMEIDA, R. E. Saneamento Básico: Abastecimento e Qualidade da Água em Panambi. Monografia do Curso de Geografia, UNIJUI, 2003.
A NOTICIA ILUSTRADA. Retirada de entulhos, limpeza em quintais deve ser comunicado ao setor de obras. 06 de nov. 1991. MAHP.
A NOTICIA ILUSTRADA.Usina de Lixo. Eficiência e simplicidade de operação, 1988, p.8.
A NOTICIA ILUSTRADA. A Notícia Ilustrada, Jornais consultados no Museu e Arquivo Histórico Professor Hermann Wegermann (1968 a 1980).
CALLAI, H. C. Estudar o lugar para entender o mundo. In: Ensino de Geografia - Práticas e Contextualizações no Cotidiano, São Paulo: Ed. Mediação, 2000.
CALLAI, H. C. Ensino de Geografia: contextualizações no cotidiano. Porto Alegre: Mediação, 2000.p. 83-131. Cap. 2.
CASTRO, J. M. A. Resíduos perigosos no direito ambiental internacional – sua internalização nos países do MERCOSUL. 1ª ed. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antônio Fabris, 2003.
CUSTÓDIO, H. B. Legislação ambiental e proteção da paisagem. OLAM- Ciências & Tecnologias. Rio Claro. Vol. 2 nº 1, p.58-94, abr/2002.
CLAVAL, P. A Geografia cultural: Florianópolis: ed. da UFSC, 1999.
ENTREVISTAS, INFORMAÇÕES VERBAIS concedidas a Cléa Hempe. TRENTINI, Ovídio, WENGRAT, P. ARPA FIÚZA. Visitas aos Lugares de Depósitos de Resíduos Sólidos, 2008, 2009, 2010 e 2011.
ENTREVISTAS COM GESTORES, EX-GESTORES, INFORMAÇÕES VERBAIS concedidas a Cléa Hempe. Lugares de Depósitos de Resíduos Sólidos utilizadas pelas Administrações Públicas 1955-2012.
FETTER, V.. Limpeza urbana apresenta relatório. Jornal Folha das Máquinas de 6 de nov. 2009.
LIBÓRIO M. G. C. A paisagem e sua proteção através de mecanismos legais. Disponível em: http://observatoriogeograficoamericalatina.org.mx/egal3/Procesosambientales/Geomorfologia/04.pdf. Acesso: 26 dez. 2011.
MONTEIRO, J. H. P. Manual de Gerenciamento Integrado de Resíduos Sólidos. Instituto de Administração Municipal – IBAM, 2001.
O PANAMBIENSE. Jornais. Disponíveis no Museu Arquivo Históricos Professor Hermann Wegermann. Consultados em 2011.
PANAMBI. PLANOS DIRETORES. Disponíveis no Museu Arquivo Históricos Professor Hermann Wegermann.
PANAMBI (RS) PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL. Licitação para recuperação de área degradada do lixão em Rincão Frente, 2005, Prefeitura Municipal de Panambi. Disponível em: http://www.guiadigital.info/index.php?not=1&pesq_not=1&mostra=2695. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2012.
PRAD - Projeto de Recuperação e Área Degradada. Central de Triagem e Compostagem com Aterro Sanitário de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos. Processo 005385-05.67/04-2. Elaborado por STC Tratamento de Resíduos Ltda, jun. 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
