Proposal for implementation of CP in a large fridge pigs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130817630Keywords:
Cleaner production, Environmental management, FridgeAbstract
Customarily awareness by companies occurs through the need to service a new audience, called "green consumer", which requires knowledge about the origin of the products they consume and also require that the production conforms to environmentally sound practices, or by means of coercive factors such as fines and penalties due to possible impacts on the environment. This study evaluated the critical points in the production process of a large pig fridge, using the tools of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Severity Urgency and Trend (GUT). It was observed that the comparison between the headquarters FMEA and GUT pointed to the high water consumption as the main critical point, especially in the premises cleaning process. The implementation of an Environmental Management System and the adoption of Cleaner Production measures contributed positively to the reduction in water consumption and meant a reduction in the company's production costs, bringing guidelines for proper waste management, awareness for the rational use of water and adding value to the waste generated.Downloads
References
AMARAL, A.; et al. Sistema de gestão ambiental e produção mais limpa. Porto Alegre, UNIDO, UNEP,
Centro Nacional de Tecnologias Limpas SENAI, 2003, 43p. Disponível em: http://www.srvprod.sistemafiergs.org.br/...senai.../sena.rs.../implementação. Acesso em: 2013-04-23.
ARAÚJO, A. A.; et al. O sistema de gestão ambiental como impulsor da educação ambiental: um estudo de caso em uma empresa do polo industrial de Manaus (PIM) a partir da percepção de seus colaboradores. Revista Monografias Ambientais - REMOA, v. 13, n. 4, p. 3580-3590, set. 2014.
BERKEL, R. V. Cleaner production and eco-efficiency initiatives in Western Australia 1996-2004. Journal of Cleaner Production. v. 15, n. 8–9, p. 741–755, 2007.
BOER, M.; VRIES, I. J. M. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of lifecycle assessments. Livestock Science. v. 128, p.1-11, 2010.
CREMONEZ, F. E.; et al. Avaliação de impacto ambiental: metodologias aplicadas no Brasil. Revista Monografias Ambientais – REMOA. v. 13, n. 5, p. 3821-3830, dez. 2014.
DOBES, V. New tool for promotion of energy management and cleaner production on no cure, no pay basis. Journal of Cleaner Production. v. 39, p. 255–264, jan. 2013.
GRZYBOWSKI, N. A suinocultura e o mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo. 2008. ACSURS. Disponível em: http://www.acsurs.com.br/. Acesso em: 2013-04-22.
HANSEN, P. I. et al. Cleaner Production Assessment in Meat Processing. 2000. Denmark. (UNEP). Disponível em: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/2482-CPmeat.pdf. Acesso em: 2013-04-02.
JAY, S.; et al. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect ans prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. v. 27, n. 4, p. 287-300, 2007.
KLASSMANN, A. B.; et al. Percepção dos funcionários dos riscos e perigos nas operações realizadas no setor de fundição. Estudos Tecnológicos, v. 7, n. 2, p. 142-162, 2011.
KRIEGER, E. I. F. Avaliação do consumo de água, racionalização do uso e reuso do efluente líquido de um frigorífico de suínos na busca da sustentabilidade socioambiental da empresa. Tese (Doutorado
em Ecologia) – Universidade Federal do rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/12050/000618507.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 2013-02-10.
KUBOTA, F. I.; ROSA, L. C. Teoria da solução inventiva de problemas integrados à Produção mais Limpa: abordagem teórica. Produção Online. v.13, n. 1, p. 233-256, jan./mar. 2013.
KUPUSOVIC, T.; et al. Cleaner production measures in small-scale slaughterhouse industry e case study in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Cleaner Production. v. 15, n. 4 , p. 378-383, 2007.
LAURENTI, R.; et al. Problemas e melhorias do método FMEA: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. P&D em Engenharia de Produção. v. 10, n. 1, p. 59-70, 2012.
MASSOTE, C. H. R.; SANTI, A. M. M. Implementation of a cleaner production program in a Brazilian wooden furniture factory. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 46, p. 89-97, mai. 2013.
MARTINS, C.; et al. Diagnóstico ambiental: uma pesquisa exploratória na região fronteira oeste do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Monografias Ambientais – REMOA. v. 11, n. 11, p. 2389-2399, jan. 2013.
MELLO, M. C. A.; et al. Produção mais Limpa: um impulso para a inovação e a obtenção de vantagens competitivas. In: XXII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção. Anais… Curitiba, ABEPRO,
MOURA, L. A. A. Qualidade e gestão ambiental: sustentabilidade e ISO 14.001. 6. ed. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2011.
OLIVEIRA, J. M.; et al. Dossiê técnico: produção mais limpa no setor de matadouros e frigoríficos. SENAI/RS. Centro Nacional de Tecnologias Limpas. Porto Alegre: FIERGS/SENAI, 2007.
PACHECO, J. W.; et al. Guia técnico ambiental de abates (bovino e suíno). São Paulo: CETESB, 2006.
PERIARD, G. Matriz GUT: guia completo. Ferramentas de Gestão, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.sobreadministracao.com/matriz-gut-guia-completo/. Acesso em: 2013-05-13.
RECKMANN, K.; TRAULSEN, I.; KRIETER, J. Environmental Impact Assessment e methodology with special emphasis on European pork production. Journal of Environmental Management. v. 107, n. 30, p.
-109, set. 2012.
SAKURADA, Eduardo Yuji. As técnicas de análise dos modos de falhas e seus efeitos e análise da árvore de falhas no desenvolvimento e na avaliação de produtos. 2001. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2001. Disponível em:
http://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/80128/178025.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 2013-02-10.
SANCHES, Roberta. A avaliação de impacto ambiental e as normas de gestão ambiental da série ISO 14000: características técnicas, comparações e subsídios à integração. 2011. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências da Engenharia Ambiental) - Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos,
Disponível em: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18139/tde-25042011-103032/. Acesso em: 2013-02-05.
SILVA, A.L.E.; et al. Aplicação da metodologia P+L na redução de desperdícios dentro das empresas de beneficiamento de tabaco. Tecno-lógica, v. 18, n. 2, p. 97-102, jul.-dez. 2014.
SILVA, D. A. L.; et al. Quality tools applied to Cleaner Production programs: a first approach toward a new methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 47, p. 174–187, mai. 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
